Abstract
Control influences how collaboration around technology works, through its means (e.g. mouse, touch) and distribution (simultaneous or sequential, shared or single). Single control can produce dominance and disengagement, but shared control needs support for awareness. Awareness, such as through gesture, bodily movement and talking, affects control. Collaboration requires actions controlled by one individual to be contingent on the actions of others, so as to create a connected flow of joint action, rather than a series of unconnected moves. Contingent behaviour can be supported through constraints, for example the SCoSS paradigm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aytac, A., & Yuill, N. (2009, July). ‘Your half is bigger than mine’: Motivating children to understand fractions. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 200(1), 771–772.
Beirl, D., Yuill, N., & Rogers, Y. (2019). Using voice assistant skills in family life. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 96–103). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Benford, S., Bederson, B. B., Åkesson, K. P., Bayon, V., Druin, A., Hansson, P., Hourcade, J.-P., Ingram, R., Neale, H., O’Malley, C., Simsarian, K., Stanton, D., Sundblad, Y., & Taxén, G. (2000). Designing storytelling technologies to encourage collaboration between young children. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings, 28(99), 556–563.
Brudy, F., & Marquardt, N. (n.d.). The tabletop is dead? Long live the table’s top! https://fbrudy.net/content/01-projects/15-tabletop-dead-alive/brudy-tabletop-iss2017.pdf.
Constantino-Gonzalez, M., Suthers, D. D., & de los Santos, J. G. E. (2003). Coaching web-based collaborative learning based on problem solution differences and participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2–4), 263–299.
Druyan, S. (2001). A comparison of four types of cognitive conflict and their effect on cognitive development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(3), 226–236.
Foley, M. A., & Ratner, H. H. (1996). Biases in children’s memory for collaborative exchanges. In D. Herrmann, M. K. Johnson, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, & P. Hertel (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications, 2, (pp. 257–267).
Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Modelling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science, 22(1), 43–68.
Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., & Rogers, Y. (2009). Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children’s collaborative interactions? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 1 (pp. 335–344). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Holt, S., & Yuill, N. (2014). Facilitating other-awareness in low-functioning children with autism and typically-developing preschoolers using dual-control technology. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(1), 1–13.
Holt, S., & Yuill, N. (2017). Tablets for two: How dual tablets can facilitate other-awareness and communication in learning disabled children with autism. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11, 72–82.
Kerawalla, L., Pearce, D., Yuill, N., Luckin, R., & Harris, A. (2008). “I’m keeping those there, are you?” The role of a new user interface paradigm–Separate Control of Shared Space (SCoSS)—In the collaborative decision-making process. Computers & Education, 50(1), 193–206.
Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 59–101.
Legoff, D. B., & Sherman, M. (2006). Long-term outcome of social skills intervention based on interactive LEGO® play. Autism, 10(4), 317–329.
Marshall, P., Fleck, R., Harris, A., Rick, J., Hornecker, E., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., & Dalton, N. S. (2009). Fighting for control: Children’s embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2149–2152). ACM.
Oatley, K., & Yuill, N. (1985). Perception of personal and interpersonal action in a cartoon film. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24(2), 115–124.
Pearce, D., Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Yuill, N., & Harris, A. (2005). The task sharing framework for collaboration and meta-collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 914–916). IOS Press.
Piper, A. M., O’Brien, E., Morris, M. R., & Winograd, T. (2006). SIDES: A cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1–10).
Reicherts, L., & Rogers, Y. (2020). Do make me think! How CUIs can support cognitive processes. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (pp. 1–4). ACM.
Rick, J., Rogers, Y., Haig, C., & Yuill, N. (2009). Learning by doing with shareable interfaces. Children Youth and Environments, 19(1), 320–341.
Rogers, Y., Lim, Y., Hazlewood, W. R., & Marshall, P. (2009). Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays? Human-Computer Interaction, 24(1–2), 79–116.
Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Harris, E., Phelps, T., Price, S., Smith, H., Muller, H., Randell, C., Moss, A., Taylor, I., Stanton, D., O’Malley, C., Corke, G., & Gabrielli, S. (2002). Things aren’t what they seem to be: innovation through technology inspiration. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 373–378).
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414.
Scott, S. D., Shoemaker, G. B. D., & Inkpen, K. (2000). Towards seamless support of natural collaborative interactions. In Graphics Interface (pp. 103–110).
Sheingold, K., Hawkins, J., & Char, C. (1984). “I’m the thinkist, you’re the typist”: The Interaction of Technology and the Social Life of Classrooms. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 49–61.
Sommerville, J. A., & Hammond, A. J. (2007). Treating another’s actions as one’s own: Children’s memory of and learning from joint activity. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1003.
Tenenbaum, H. R., Winstone, N. E., Leman, P. J., & Avery, R. E. (2020). How effective is peer interaction in facilitating learning? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1303–1319.
Wallace, J. R., Scott, S. D., & MacGregor, C. G. (2013). Collaborative sensemaking on a digital tabletop and personal tablets: prioritization, comparisons, and tableaux. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3345–3354). ACM.
Yuill, N., Pearce, D., Kerawalla, L., Harris, A., & Luckin, R. (2009). How technology for comprehension training can support conversation towards the joint construction of meaning. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 109–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yuill, N. (2021). Contingency and Control. In: Technology to Support Children's Collaborative Interactions. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75047-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75047-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75046-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75047-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)