Abstract
This chapter focuses on exploring the effects of the teacher’s unconscious or conscious transferring of gender knowledge to private school primary students in the Philippines. Critical discourse analysis, feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis, and a modified version of the INTERSECT observation system were used to analyse teacher–student classroom interactions, the students’ descriptive essays, and focus group discussions to quantify and qualify the teacher’s role in the gendering process of ESL students. This chapter shows how classroom interaction between ESL teachers and students creates a pattern defined by the quantity of Praise, Acceptance, Criticism, and Remediation interactions which either challenges or maintains the students’ current gender knowledge. It includes practical implications and suggestions that can help teachers raise awareness on gender stereotypes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aikman, S., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Practising gender equality in education. Oxfam GB.
Asia Development Bank. (2013). Gender equality in the labor market in the Philippines. Mandaluyong City, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Critically queer. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 1(1), 17–32.
Chen, K. (2007). A study of primary classroom interactions: Is there still gender imbalance in the primary classroom? Retrieved from http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS.volume4.html.
David, C., Albert J. R., &Vizmanos J. F. (2018). Boys are still left behind in basic education. PIDC Policy Notes No. 2018–20. Makati City, the Philippines: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Duranti, A., Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of language socialization. John Wiley and Sons.
Fairclough, N. (1987). Language and power: Language in social life. Longman.
Grasha, A. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42(2), 142–149.
Hassaskhah, J., & Zamir, S. (2013). Gendered teacher-student interactions in English language classrooms: A case of Iranian college context. SAGE Open, 1(11), 1–11.
Hernandez, T., & Cudiamat, M. (2017). Integrating gender and development (GAD) in the classroom: The case of Lucsuhin National High School, Department of Education—Philippines. KnE Social Sciences, 3(6), 1135–1141.
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (2014). The discourse reader. Routledge.
Lai, F. (2010). Are boys left behind? The evolution of the gender achievement gap in Beijing’s middle schools. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 383–399.
Meadows, S. (1996). Parenting behavior and children’s cognitive Development. Psychology Press.
Moore, A. R. (2020). Understanding heteronormativity in ELT textbooks: A practical taxonomy. ELT Journal, 74(2), 116–125.
Patiag, V. (2019, March 3). In the Philippines they think of gender differently. We could too. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com.
Riley, T. (2014). Boys are like puppies, girls aim to please: How teachers’ gender stereotypes may influence student placement decisions and classroom teaching. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–21.
Sadker, D., Sadker, M., & Bauchner, J. (1984). Teacher reactions to classroom response of male and female students (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED245839). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Sunderland, J. (Ed.). (1994). Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English language education. Prentice-Hall.
Swann, J. (2003). 27 Schooled language: Language in educational settings. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 624–644). Blackwell.
Tan, M. L. (2001). Survival through Pluralism: Emerging gay communities in the Philippines. In G. Sullivan & P. A. Jackson (Eds.), Gay and lesbian Asia: Culture, identity, community (pp. 117–142). The Haworth Press Inc.
Tannen, D. (1996). Researching gender-related patterns in classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 341–344.
Tarrayo, V. N. (2014). Gendered word (or world): Sexism in Philippine preschool English language textbooks. Journal on English Language Teaching, 4(2), 25–32.
World Economic Forum. (2018). Insight report—The global gender gap report 2018. 13th Anniversary ed. Cologny (Switzerland): World Economic Forum 2018. Available from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2018. Accessed 18 Mar 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Potestades, R.R. (2021). Exploring the Role of Teacher Talk in the Gender Identity Construction of Filipino Children. In: Banegas, D.L., Beacon, G., Pérez Berbain, M. (eds) International Perspectives on Diversity in ELT. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74981-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74981-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74980-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74981-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)