Abstract
This chapter focuses on differentiation in English language teaching. We present the 5-dimensional (5D) model of differentiation which has been created based on the Finnish educational context. The model is grounded in the postulate that differentiation is a proactive and student-centred approach that permeates all teaching and involves the entire school community. The 5D model progresses from general to specific. It advocates for differentiation to be implemented holistically in several dimensions of teaching which are teaching arrangements, learning environment, teaching methods, support materials and assessment. Furthermore, it proposes that all differentiation should be based on students’ individual characteristics, such as learning profile, self-esteem, interests, readiness, needs, motivation, personality and history.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahtiainen, R., Beirad, M., Hautamäki, J., Hilasvuori, T., & Thuneberg, H. (2011). Samanaikaisopetus On Mahdollisuus. Tutkimus Helsingin Pilottikoulujen Uudistuvasta Opetuksesta. Helsinki Department of Education.
Basic Education Act. (628/1998). Available at: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2020.
Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.
Council of Europe. (n.d.). What is the ELP? Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio/introduction. Accessed 21 Jan 20.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2013). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. (2014). (4th ed.). Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
Gardner, H. (2008). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. Basic Books.
Harlen, W. (2012). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 87–102). Sage.
Hayward, L. (2012). Assessment and learning: The learner’s perspective. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 125–139). Sage.
Kivirauma, J., & Ruoho, K. (2007). Excellence through special education? Lessons from the Finnish school reform. International Review of Education, 53(3), 283–302.
Laari, A., Lakkala, S., & Uusiautti, S. (2021). “For the whole grade’s common good and based on the student’s own current situation”: Differentiated teaching and the choice of methods among Finnish teachers. Early Child Development and Care, 191(4), 598–611.
Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research. Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258–267.
Murdoch, K. (2015). The power of inquiry: Teaching and learning with curiosity, creativity and purpose in the contemporary classroom. Seastar Education.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 195–206). Oxford University Press.
Nikula, T., & Moore, P. (2019). Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237–249.
Official Statistics of Finland. (2018). Special education [e-publication]. Available at: https://www.stat.fi/til/erop/2018/erop_2018_2019-06-19_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.
Pihko, M. K. (2007). Minä, Koulu ja Englanti. Vertaileva Tutkimus Englanninkielisen Sisällönopetuksen ja Perinteisen Englannin Opetuksen Affektiivisista Tuloksista. University of Jyväskylä.
Rauste-von Wright, M., von Wright, J., & Soini, T. (2003). Oppiminen ja Koulutus. WSOY.
Roiha, A. (2014). Teachers’ views on differentiation in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Perceptions, practices and challenges. Language and Education, 28(1), 1–18.
Roiha, A., & Polso, J. (2020). How to succeed in differentiation? The Finnish approach. John Catt Educational.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416.
Stoller, F. (2002). Project work: A means to promote language and content. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 107–119). Cambridge University Press.
Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(2), 291–301.
Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenology: The recent curriculum reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 31–47.
Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., & Nevin, A. I. (2006). The many faces of collaborative planning and teaching. Theory into Practice, 45(3), 239–248.
Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., & Nevin, A. I. (2007). Differentiating instruction: Collaborative planning and teaching for universally designed learning. Corwin Press.
Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(1), 60–89.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. ASCD.
van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmansb, D., van Merriënboerb, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51–67.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roiha, A., Polso, J. (2021). The 5-Dimensional Model: A Finnish Approach to Differentiation. In: Banegas, D.L., Beacon, G., Pérez Berbain, M. (eds) International Perspectives on Diversity in ELT. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74981-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74981-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74980-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74981-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)