Abstract
Urban wastelands have great potential for promoting biodiversity. As many cities shrink in size, these unused areas will continue to increase while available revenues for land maintenance will decrease. Managing such wastelands in ways that promote biodiversity, such as encouraging spontaneous vegetation and ecological succession, reduces maintenance costs while also providing many environmental and social benefits to the urban population. I reviewed the literature since March 2014 and found 31 studies of factors that influence biodiversity in urban wastelands. There is a strong geographic bias toward studies in North America (15) and Europe (10), and a taxonomic bias toward arthropods (16), plants (11), and birds (6). These studies often show that wastelands contain as much, and often more, biodiversity than other urban green spaces. Consistent with a previous review, local factors (area, age, soil, microclimate, and previous and current land use) are dominant influences on biodiversity in wastelands, with landscape factors often playing a secondary role. Next, I discuss how these factors have played a role in the Knoxville Urban Wilderness (KUW) project which has been very successful in acquiring and managing a variety of wasteland parcels to achieve economic and ecological goals. Examples of their application include increasing land acquisition (more area and spatial habitat diversity including soils and microclimates), increasing connectivity (greenways and trails), and maintaining the parcels in different stages of ecological succession. These efforts have undoubtedly contributed significantly to the biodiversity of this urban region. For example, although the KUW occupies a tiny fraction (688 ha) of Knox County, roughly two-thirds of Knox County bird species utilize the KUW, and about 13% of known threatened species in Knox County have been recorded in the KUW. I also briefly discuss how the KUW has successfully coordinated the acquisition and management of many parcels of vacant land, worked with many stakeholder groups, greatly increased public exposure to biodiversity, and contributed over $8 million to the local economy each year.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler FR, Tanner CJ (2013) Urban ecosystems. Cambridge Univ Press. Cambridge, UK, 345 pp
Anderson EC, Minor ES (2019) Assessing social and biophysical drivers of spontaneous plant diversity and structure in urban vacant lots. Sci Total Env 653:1272–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.006
Anderson EC, Minor ES (2020) Management effects on plant community and functional assemblages in Chicago’s vacant lots. Applied Veg Sci 23:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12480
Ballantyne M, Pickering CM (2015) The impacts of trail infrastructure on vegetation and soils: current literature and future directions. J Envir Manag 164:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.032
Blouin D, Pellerin S, Poulin M (2019) Increase in non-native species richness leads to biotic homogenization in vacant lots of a highly urbanized landscape. Urban Ecosyst 22:879–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00863-9
Bonthoux S, Brun M, Di Pietro F, Greulich S, Bouche-Pillon S (2014) How can wastelands promote biodiversity in cities? A review. Landsc Urb Plan 132:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.010
Botzat A, Fischer LK, Kowarik I (2016) Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Global Env Change 39:220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008
Brun M, Di Pietro F, Bonthoux S (2018) Residents’ perceptions and valuations of urban wastelands are influenced by vegetation structure. Urban for Urban Green 29:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.005
Buchholz A, Hannig K, Moeller M (2018) Reducing management intensity and isolation as promising tools to enhance ground dwelling arthropod diversity in urban grasslands. Urban Ecosyst 12:1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0786-2
Buchholz S, Gathof AK, Grossmann AJ, Kowarik I, Fischer LK (2020) Wild bees in urban grasslands: urbanisation, functional diversity and species traits. Landsc Urb Plan 196. Article Number: 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103731
Burkman CE, Gardiner MM (2015) Spider assemblages within greenspaces of a deindustrialized urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 18:793–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0430-8
Cabral I, Keim J, Engelmann R, Kraemer R, Siebert J, Bonn A (2017) Ecosystem services of allotment and community gardens: a Leipzig, Germany case study. Urban for Urban Green 23:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.008
Costanza R (2006) The value of New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science, Research, and Technology, Trenton, NJ
Da Rocha LC, Montagnana PC, Boscolo D, Garofalo CA (2020) Green patches among a grey patchwork: the importance of preserving natural habitats to harbour cavity-nesting bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) and their natural enemies in urban areas. Biodiv Conserv 29:2487–2514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01985-9
De la Flor YDA, Perry KI, Turo KJ, Parker DM, Thompson JL, Gardiner MM (2020) Local and landscape-scale environmental filters drive the functional diversity and taxonomic composition of spiders across urban greenspaces. J Appl Eco. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13636EarlyAccess
Deak B, Huse B, Tothmeresz B (2016) Grassland vegetation in urban habitats—testing ecological theories. Tuexenia 36:379–393. https://doi.org/10.14471/2016.36.017
Eckert S, Moller M, Buchholz S (2017) Grasshopper diversity of urban wastelands is primarily boosted by habitat factors. Insect Conserv Biodiv 10:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12221
Figueroa JA, Saldias G, Teillier S, Carrera E, Castro SA (2020) Seed banks in urban vacant lots of a Latin American megacity are easily germinable and strongly dominated by exotic flora. Urban Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00986-4
Fischer LK, Eichfeld J, Kowarik I, Buchholz S (2016) Disentangling urban habitat and matrix effects on wild bee species. PEERJ 4. Article Number: e2729. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2729
Fischer LK, Neuenkamp L, Lampinen J, Tuomi M, Alday JG, Bucharova A et al (2020) Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe. Conserv Lett Early. Article Number: e12718. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12718
Haase D (2008) Urban ecology of shrinking cities: an unrecognized opportunity? NAT + CUL 3:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2008.030101
Haase D (2013) Chapter 12: shrinking cities, biodiversity and ecosystem services. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Hostetler M (2020) Cues to care: future directions for ecological landscapes. Urban Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00990-8
Ives CD, Oke C, Hehir A, Gordon A, Wang Y, Bekessy SA (2017) Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landsc Urb Plan 161:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.010
Johnson AL, Borowy D, Swan C (2018) Land use history and seed dispersal drive divergent plant community assembly patterns in urban vacant lots. J Appl Ecol 55:451–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12958
Johnson MP, Hollander J, Halluli A (2014) Maintain, demolish, re-purpose: policydesign for vacant land management using decision models. Cities 40:151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.005
Johnson AL, Tauzer EC, Swan CM (2015) Human legacies differentially organize functional and phylogenetic diversity of urban herbaceous plant communities at multiple spatial scales. Appl Veg Sci 18:513–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12155
Kim G, Miller P, Nowak D (2016) The value of green infrastructure on vacant and residential land in Roanoke, Virginia. Sustainability 8. Article Number 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040296
Kowarik I (2018) Urban wilderness: supply, demand and access. Urban for Urban Green 29:336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.017
Kowarik I, Hiller A, Planchuelo G, Seitz B, von der Lippe M, Buchholz S (2019) Emerging urban forests: opportunities for promoting the wild side of the urban green infrastructure. Sustainability 11. Article Number 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226318
Kremer P, Hamstead ZA, McPhearson T (2013) A social-ecological assessment of vacant lots in New York City. Landsc Urb Plan 120:218–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.003
Kwit C, Collins B (2008) Native grasses as a management alternative on vegetated closure caps. Envir Manag 41:929–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9090-x
Lerman SB, Contosta AR, Milam J, Bang C (2018) To mow or to mow less: lawn mowing frequency affects bee abundance and diversity in suburban yards. Biol Conserv 221:160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.025
Mathey J, Arndt T, Banse J, Rink D (2018) Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas-results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany). Urban for Urban Green 29:384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.007
Mathey J, Rossler S, Banse J, Lehmann I, Brauer A (2015) Brownfields as an element of green infrastructure for implementing ecosystem services into urban areas. J Urb Plan Dev 14:A4015001-1-A4015001–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000275
McKinney M, VerBerkmoes A (2020) Beneficial health outcomes of natural green infrastructure in Cities. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-020-00051-y
Melliger RL, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2017) Habitat- and matrix-related differences in species diversity and trait richness of vascular plants, Orthoptera and Lepidoptera in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 20:1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0662-5
Mody E, Lerch D, Muller AK, Simons NK, Bluethgen N, Harnisch M (2020) Flower power in the city: replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs. PLOS ONE 15. Article Number: e0234327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234327
Moorhead LC, Philpott SM (2013) Richness and composition of spiders in urban green spaces in Toledo, Ohio. J Arachnol 41:356–363. https://doi.org/10.1636/P12-44.1
Muratet A, Machon N, Jiguet F, Moret J, Porcher E (2007) The role of urban structures in the distribution of wasteland flora in the greater Paris area, France. Ecosystems 10:661–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9047-6
Newman GD, Bowman AO, Lee RJ, Kim B (2016) A current inventory of vacant land in America. J Urban Des 21:302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1167589
Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban for Urban Green 4:115–123
Pagano MA, Bowman AO (2000) Vacant land in cities: an urban resource. Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC, USA
Palliwoda J, Banzhaf E, Priess JA (2020) How do the green components of urban green infrastructure influence the use of ecosystem services? Examples from Leipzig, Germany. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01004-w
Peterson AC, Ghers, BM, Campanella R, Riegel C, Lewis JA, Blum MJ (2020) Rodent assemblage structure reflects socioecological mosaics of counter-urbanization across post-Hurricane Katrina New Orleans. Landsc Urb Plan 195. Article Number: 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103710
Philpott SM, Cotton J, Bichier P, Friedrich RL, Moorhead LC, Uno S, Valdez M (2014) Local and landscape drivers of arthropod abundance, richness, and trophic composition in urban habitats. Urban Ecosyst 17:513–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0333-0
Ramalingam R, Rajan PD (2017) Effects of various urban land-uses on the epigeic beetle communities in Bangalore city, India. Tropical Ecol 58:295–305
Rega-Brodsky CC, Nilon CH (2017) Forest cover is important across multiple scales for bird communities in vacant lots. Urban Ecosyst 20:561–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0614-5
Rega-Brodsky CC, Nilon CH (2016) Vacant lots as a habitat resource: nesting success and body condition of songbirds. Ecosphere 7. Article Number: e01578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1578
Rega-Brodsky CC, Nilon CH, Warren PS (2018) Balancing urban biodiversity needs and resident preferences for vacant lot management. Sustainability 10. Article Number: 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051679
Riley CB, Herms DA, Gardiner MM (2018b) Exotic trees contribute to urban forest diversity and ecosystem services in inner-city cleveland, OH. Urban for Urban Green 29:367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.004
Riley CB, Perry KI, Ard K, Gardiner MM (2018a) Asset or liability? Ecological and sociological tradeoffs of urban spontaneous vegetation on vacant land in shrinking cities. Sustainability 10. Article Number: 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072139
Roche DV, Cardilini APA, Lees D, Maguire GS, Dann P, Sherman CDH, Weston MA (2016) Human residential status and habitat quality affect the likelihood but not the success of lapwing breeding in an urban matrix. Sci Total Env 556:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.008
Sehrt M, Bossdorf O, Freitag M, Bucharova A (2020) Less is more! Rapid increase in plant species richness after reduced mowing in urban grasslands. Basic Appl Ecology 42:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2019.10.008
Sims C, Davis B, Kim B (2015) Economic potential of South Knoxville’s urban wilderness. Baker Center Policy Paper 2:15. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Sivakoff FS, Prajzner SP, Gardiner MM (2018) Unique bee communities within vacant lots and urban farms result from variation in surrounding urbanization intensity. Sustainability 10. Article Number: 1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061926
Threlfall CG, Kendal D (2018) The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban for Urban Green 2:348–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.012
Twerd L, Krzyzynski M, Waldon-Rudzionek B, Olszewski P (2017) Can soda ash dumping grounds provide replacement habitats for digger wasps (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Spheciformes)? PLOS ONE 12. Article Number: e0175664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175664
Twerd L, Banaszak-Cibicka W ((2019) Wastelands: their attractiveness and importance for preserving the diversity of wild bees in urban areas. J Insect Conserv 23:573–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00148-8
Vacht P, Niglas H, Kuu A, Koff T, Kutti S, Raamets J (2019) Oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) communities of urban brownfields in Tallinn, Estonia, and their potential as bioindicators of wasteland successional stage. Acarologia 59:26–32. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20194310
Villasenor NR, Chiang LA, Hernandez HJ, Escobar MAH (2020) Vacant lands as refuges for native birds: an opportunity for biodiversity conservation in cities. Urban For Urban Green 49. Article Number: 126632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126632
Wadhwa S (2018) Community and population characteristics of soil arthropods along a heavy metal gradient in urban brownfields. Rutgers University Community Repository. https://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.utk.edu:90/10.7282/T3X63QW1
Zefferman EP, McKinney ML, Cianciolo T, Fritz BI (2018) Knoxville’s urban wilderness: moving toward sustainable multifunctional management. Urban for Urban Green 29:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.002
Zuniga-Palacios J, Zuria I, Moreno CE, Almazan-Nunez RC, Gonzalez-Ledesma M (2020) Can small vacant lots become important reservoirs for birds in urban areas? A case study for a Latin American city. Urban For Urban Green 47. Article Number: 126551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126551
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKinney, M.L. (2021). Strategies for Increasing Biodiversity Conservation in Cities Using Wastelands: Review and Case Study. In: Di Pietro, F., Robert, A. (eds) Urban Wastelands. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74882-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74882-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74881-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74882-1
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)