Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Addressing Structural Secrecy as a Way of Nurturing Resilient Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing Resilient Performance

Abstract

Structural secrecy refers to a systematic undermining of attempts to know and interpret situations in organisations, which significantly challenges their abilities to perform resiliently. In this chapter, we briefly share some insights drawn from a collaboration with the municipality of Malmö, Sweden, for a period of more than three years that has provided knowledge about the needs and constraints to better addressing challenges related to structural secrecy. To deal with this problem, it is essential to find ways of sharing insights about the criticality and interconnections between organisational units. The chapter outlines a method implemented in the departments in Malmö municipality used for compiling and spreading such information within the organisation as a means to become better equipped for managing both daily tasks and surprises. By contributing to an alignment of diverging views on “work as done” versus “work as imagined” this type of effort lays the groundwork for nurturing an ability to perform resiliently in suddenly emerging situations that are outside the organisation’s normal operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707–2716.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A., & Waterman, S. (2009). The politics and policy challenges of disaster resilience. In C. P. Nemeth, E. Hollnagel, & S. W. A. Dekker (Eds.), Preparation and restoration. Resilience engineering perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 15–38). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., Comfort, L. K., & Demchak, C. C. (2010). The rise of resilience. In A. Boin, L. K. Comfort, & C. C. Demchak (Eds.), Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events (pp. 1–12). University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijne, M., Boin, A., & van Eeten, M. (2010). Resilience: Exploring the concept and its meanings. In A. Boin, L. K. Comfort, & C. C. Demchak (Eds.), Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events (pp. 13–32). University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Degerman, H., Bram, S., & Eriksson, K. (2018). Resilient performance in response to the 2015 refugee influx in the Øresund region. In S. Haugen, A. Barros, C. van Gulijk, T. Kongsvik, & J. E. Vinnem (Eds.), Safety and reliability – Safe societies in a changing world. Proceedings of ESREL 2018, Trondheim, Norway (pp. 1313–1318). CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haavik, T. K., Antonsen, S., Rosness, R., & Hale, A. (2019). HRO and RE: A pragmatic perspective. Safety Science, 117, 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, H., & Cedergren, A. (2017). A method for combined risk and continuity management in a municipal context. Proceedings of the 2017 European Safety and Reliability Conference ESREL, Portorož, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Staudenmayer, N. (2000). Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 153–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., & Woods, D. D. (2006). Epilogue: Resilience engineering precepts. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, & N. Leveson (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (2006). Resilience–The challenge of the unstable. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, & N. Leveson (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (2008). Preface: Resilience engineering in a nutshell. In E. Hollnagel, C. P. Nemeth, & S. W. A. Dekker (Eds.), Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure. Resilience engineering perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. xi–xiv). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (2009). The four cornerstones of resilience engineering. In C. P. Nemeth, E. Hollnagel, & S. W. A. Dekker (Eds.), Preparation and restoration. Resilience engineering perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 117–134). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. (2014). Issues in safety science. Safety Science, 67, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO 22301 societal security: Business continuity management systems: Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (2005). A failure to communicate: 9/11 and the tragedy of the informational commons. International Public Management Journal, 8(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Månsson, P. (2019). Uncommon sense: A review of challenges and opportunities for aggregating disaster risk information. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Månsson, P., Abrahamsson, M., Hassel, H., & Tehler, H. (2015). On common terms with shared risks–Studying the communication of risk between local, regional and national authorities in Sweden. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 493–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendall, R., Foster, K. A., & Cowell, M. (2010). Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 3(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. D. (2015). Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 141, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. D., & Branlat, M. (2011). Basic patterns in how adaptive systems fail. In J. Wreathall (Ed.), Resilience Engineering in practice: A guidebook (pp. 127–144). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. D., & Hollnagel, E. (2006). Prologue: Resilience engineering concepts. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, & N. Leveson (Eds.), Resilience Engineering: Concepts and precepts (pp. 315–325). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D.D. (2003, October 29). Creating foresight: How resilience engineering can transform NASA’s approach to risky decision making. Testimony on the future of NASA for Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. John McCain, Chair, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Alexander Cedergren & Henrik Hassel

Authors
  1. Alexander Cedergren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henrik Hassel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Cedergren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Research Associates, Inc, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Christopher P. Nemeth

  2. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

    Erik Hollnagel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cedergren, A., Hassel, H. (2022). Addressing Structural Secrecy as a Way of Nurturing Resilient Performance. In: Nemeth, C.P., Hollnagel, E. (eds) Advancing Resilient Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74689-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74689-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74688-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74689-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation