Skip to main content

Acting in Safety from the Design to the Implementation of Helicopter Maintenance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 222))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1782 Accesses

Abstract

In order to avoid helicopters accidents, maintainability engineers seek to identify, evaluate and solve what they called “the risks of maintenance errors” done by maintenance mechanics, and sometimes pilots performing simple pre-flight maintenance tasks. Here we will argue that beyond trying to avoid errors by following procedures, acting safely involves trade-offs between safety and performance within the engineers’ and mechanics’ activity. This papers show the relations between the mechanics’ and engineers’ work using the Critical Incident interview technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amalberti, R.: Navigating safety: Necessary compromises and trade-offs-theory and practice, vol. 13. springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Atak, A., Kingma. S.: Safety culture in an aircraft maintenance organisation: a view from the inside. Saf. Sci. 49(2), 268–278 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchekroun, T.H.: Organiser la participation et l’agir collectif pour rendre le travail supportable. Sci. sociales et santé 35(4), 97–104 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, F., Zare, M., Sagot, J. C., Paquin, R.: Using digital and physical simulation to focus on human factors and ergonomics in aviation maintainability. Human factors. 62(1), 37–54 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisseret, A., Sebillotte, S., Falzon, P.: Techniques pratiques pour l’étude des activités expertes. Octarè (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourmaud, G., Rétaux, X.: Rapports entre conception institutionnelle et conception dans I'usage. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 137–144 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L.: An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Stud. 9(3), 159–168 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, L.D., Borgen, W.A., Amundson, N.E., Maglio, A.S.T.: Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qualitative research 5(4), 475–497 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Wang, Y.: Significant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians. Saf. Sci. 48(1), 54–62 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cru, D.: La prudence: des savoir-faire à la langue de métier. Clinique du travail, pp. 75–109 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Terssac, G., Gaillard, I.: La sécurité en action. Toulouse: Octares (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Terssac, G., Mignard, J.: Les paradoxes de la sécurité. Le cas d’AZF. PUF (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzon, P., Darses, F.: La conception collective: une approche de l’ergonomie cognitive. Coopération et conception, Octarès, 123–135 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, D., René, J.F., Duval, M., Garon, S., Fontaine, A., Chénard, J., Lefebvre, C.: La dynamique partenariale sur les pratiques des organismes communautaires dans le contexte de la réorganisation du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux. Nouvelles pratiques sociales 14(1), 111–131 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, I.: État des connaissances sur le retour d’expérience industriel et ses facteurs socioculturels de réussite ou d’échec. Cahier de l’ICSI (2) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E.: The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off: why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University PRESS (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, J.H., Tikayat Ray, A., Zhang, K.S., Churchwell, J.S.: Maintenance and inspection as risk factors in helicopter accidents: Analysis and recommendations. PloS one 14(2) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille Murie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Murie, C., Buchmann, W., Cuvelier, L., Barcellini, F., Bernard, F., Paquin, R. (2021). Acting in Safety from the Design to the Implementation of Helicopter Maintenance. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 222. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74610-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74611-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics