Abstract
Automated driving is an ever-fast developing technology which is going to change the traffic system fundamentally. This development raises the question about how to interact in urban, less-regulated situations involving automated vehicles (AV) and vulnerable road users (VRU) like cyclists and/or pedestrians. Thus, it is essential to gain an understanding of interactions between VRU and current, mainly non-automated vehicles. This study focusses on cyclist-vehicle interaction and raises the questions whether there are typical interaction parameters. To address these issues, data of a previous Naturalistic Cycling Study (NCS), was re-analyzed. The selected sample consisted of 11 cyclists (ranging from 24 to 48 years, 8 males, 3 females). The subjects’ bicycles were instrumented with two cameras (forward view and face of the rider) that recorded a four-week lasting cycling period. In total, 69 interactions between cyclists and vehicles in less-regulated traffic context were analyzed. As a result of this descriptive approach, we identified common cyclist maneuvers (e.g., avoiding) and behavioral parameters (e.g., keeping constant speed) in the light of different infrastructural context. The discussion addresses the functionality of different behavioral patterns and the arising challenges for AV technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For more information about the original Naturalistic Cycling Study, see: [17].
References
Hagenzieker, M.P., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., van Schagen, I.N.G., de Bruin, J., van Gent, P., Commandeur, J.J.: Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: results of a photo experiment. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 12(1), 94–115 (2020)
Vissers, L., van der Kint, S., van Schlagen, I., Hagenzieker, M.: Safe interaction between cyclists, pedestrians and automated vehicles. What do we know and what do we need to know? Technical Report The Hague, Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research (2016)
Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Bluhm, L.F., Löw, A., Krems, J.F.: Deceleration parameters and their applicability as informal communication signal between pedestrians and automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62, 757–768 (2019)
Tabone, W., de Winter, J., Ackermann, C., Bärgman, J., Baumann, M., Deb, S., Emmenegger, C., Habibovic, A., Hagenzieker, M., Hancock, P.A., Happee, R., Krems, J., Lee, J.D., Martens, M., Merat, N., Norman, D., Sheridan, T.B., Stanton, N.A.: Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: expert perspectives. Transp. Res. Interdisc. Perspect. 9, 100293 (2021)
Räsänen, M., Summala, H.: Car drivers’ adjustments to cyclists at roundabouts. Transp. Hum. Factors 2, 1–17 (2000)
Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Kraftrad- und Fahrradunfälle im Straßenverkehr 2019 (2020)
Dozza, M., Werneke, J.: Introducing naturalistic cycling data: what factors influence bicyclists’ safety in the real world? Transp. Res. Part F 24, 83–91 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.001
Thompson, D.C., Rebolledo, V., Thompson, R.S., Kaufman, A., Rivara, F.P.: Bike speed measurements in a recreational population: validity of self reported speed. Inj. Prev. 3(1), 43–45 (1997)
Alrutz, D., Bohle, W., Müller, H., Prahlow, H., Hacke, U., Lohmann, G.: Unfallrisiko und Regelakzeptanz von Fahrradfahrern (Heft 184). Bergisch-Gladbach: Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (2009)
Chen, C.F., Chen, P.C.: Estimating recreational cyclists’ preferences for bicycle routes–evidence from Taiwan. Transp. Policy 26, 23–30 (2013)
Bernhoft, I.M., Carstensen, G.: Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 11(2), 83–95 (2008)
Broach, J., Dill, J., Gliebe, J.: Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 46(10), 1730–1740 (2012)
Menghini, G., Carrasco, N., Schüssler, N., Axhausen, K.W.: Route choice of cyclists in Zurich. Transp. Res. part A: Policy Pract. 44(9), 754–765 (2010)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future. Transp. Rev. 37(6), 689–694 (2017)
Lee, O., Rasch, A., Schwab, A.L., Dozza, M.: Modelling cyclists’ comfort zones from obstacle avoidance manoeuvres. Accid. Anal. Prev. 144, 105609 (2020)
Dozza, M., Piccinini, G.F.B., Werneke, J.: Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior. Transp. Res. part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 41, 217–226 (2016)
Schleinitz, K., Petzoldt, T., Franke-Bartholdt, L., Krems, J., Gehlert, T.: The german naturalistic cycling study-comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles. Saf. Sci. 92, 290–297 (2017)
Tafidis, P., Pirdavani, A., Brijs, T., Farah, H.: Can automated vehicles improve cyclist safety in urban areas? Safety 5(3), 57 (2019)
Acknowledgement
This study was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no.: 16ES1035). We also would like to thank German Insurers Accident Research (UDV) who gave us the chance to re-analyze the original NCS data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ackermann, C., Trommler, D., Krems, J. (2021). Exploring Cyclist-Vehicle Interaction – Results from a Naturalistic Cycling Study. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)