Skip to main content

Exploring Cyclist-Vehicle Interaction – Results from a Naturalistic Cycling Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 221))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automated driving is an ever-fast developing technology which is going to change the traffic system fundamentally. This development raises the question about how to interact in urban, less-regulated situations involving automated vehicles (AV) and vulnerable road users (VRU) like cyclists and/or pedestrians. Thus, it is essential to gain an understanding of interactions between VRU and current, mainly non-automated vehicles. This study focusses on cyclist-vehicle interaction and raises the questions whether there are typical interaction parameters. To address these issues, data of a previous Naturalistic Cycling Study (NCS), was re-analyzed. The selected sample consisted of 11 cyclists (ranging from 24 to 48 years, 8 males, 3 females). The subjects’ bicycles were instrumented with two cameras (forward view and face of the rider) that recorded a four-week lasting cycling period. In total, 69 interactions between cyclists and vehicles in less-regulated traffic context were analyzed. As a result of this descriptive approach, we identified common cyclist maneuvers (e.g., avoiding) and behavioral parameters (e.g., keeping constant speed) in the light of different infrastructural context. The discussion addresses the functionality of different behavioral patterns and the arising challenges for AV technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information about the original Naturalistic Cycling Study, see: [17].

References

  1. Hagenzieker, M.P., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., van Schagen, I.N.G., de Bruin, J., van Gent, P., Commandeur, J.J.: Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: results of a photo experiment. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 12(1), 94–115 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vissers, L., van der Kint, S., van Schlagen, I., Hagenzieker, M.: Safe interaction between cyclists, pedestrians and automated vehicles. What do we know and what do we need to know? Technical Report The Hague, Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Bluhm, L.F., Löw, A., Krems, J.F.: Deceleration parameters and their applicability as informal communication signal between pedestrians and automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62, 757–768 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabone, W., de Winter, J., Ackermann, C., Bärgman, J., Baumann, M., Deb, S., Emmenegger, C., Habibovic, A., Hagenzieker, M., Hancock, P.A., Happee, R., Krems, J., Lee, J.D., Martens, M., Merat, N., Norman, D., Sheridan, T.B., Stanton, N.A.: Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: expert perspectives. Transp. Res. Interdisc. Perspect. 9, 100293 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Räsänen, M., Summala, H.: Car drivers’ adjustments to cyclists at roundabouts. Transp. Hum. Factors 2, 1–17 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Kraftrad- und Fahrradunfälle im Straßenverkehr 2019 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dozza, M., Werneke, J.: Introducing naturalistic cycling data: what factors influence bicyclists’ safety in the real world? Transp. Res. Part F 24, 83–91 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, D.C., Rebolledo, V., Thompson, R.S., Kaufman, A., Rivara, F.P.: Bike speed measurements in a recreational population: validity of self reported speed. Inj. Prev. 3(1), 43–45 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alrutz, D., Bohle, W., Müller, H., Prahlow, H., Hacke, U., Lohmann, G.: Unfallrisiko und Regelakzeptanz von Fahrradfahrern (Heft 184). Bergisch-Gladbach: Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, C.F., Chen, P.C.: Estimating recreational cyclists’ preferences for bicycle routes–evidence from Taiwan. Transp. Policy 26, 23–30 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernhoft, I.M., Carstensen, G.: Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 11(2), 83–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Broach, J., Dill, J., Gliebe, J.: Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 46(10), 1730–1740 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Menghini, G., Carrasco, N., Schüssler, N., Axhausen, K.W.: Route choice of cyclists in Zurich. Transp. Res. part A: Policy Pract. 44(9), 754–765 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future. Transp. Rev. 37(6), 689–694 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, O., Rasch, A., Schwab, A.L., Dozza, M.: Modelling cyclists’ comfort zones from obstacle avoidance manoeuvres. Accid. Anal. Prev. 144, 105609 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dozza, M., Piccinini, G.F.B., Werneke, J.: Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior. Transp. Res. part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 41, 217–226 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schleinitz, K., Petzoldt, T., Franke-Bartholdt, L., Krems, J., Gehlert, T.: The german naturalistic cycling study-comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles. Saf. Sci. 92, 290–297 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tafidis, P., Pirdavani, A., Brijs, T., Farah, H.: Can automated vehicles improve cyclist safety in urban areas? Safety 5(3), 57 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no.: 16ES1035). We also would like to thank German Insurers Accident Research (UDV) who gave us the chance to re-analyze the original NCS data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Ackermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ackermann, C., Trommler, D., Krems, J. (2021). Exploring Cyclist-Vehicle Interaction – Results from a Naturalistic Cycling Study. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics