Skip to main content

The SRA Index (Sustainable Risk Awareness Index): A New KPI for Management Support

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Abstract

The objective with this project is to develop a key performance indicator (KPI) related to work environment deviations, such as risk observations, near misses and injuries. This as a support for managers decision making in steering companies towards higher risk awareness as well as to contribute to the development of safer and more sustainable work environments and jobs. In addition, the aim is to contribute to a work environment (WE) reporting standard with a KPI related to the severity of WE deviations. Based on a literature study an iterative development of such a KPI has resulted in the Sustainable Risk Awareness Index (the SRA Index) and a visualization of it and its components using the Risk Awareness Triangle, also developed in this project. The development of the SRA Index is described and the index is exemplified with data from the electrical installation sector, the healthcare industry and one of Sweden’s largest private health company. Also the Risk Triangle is exemplified. The need for and the advantages of standardized methods to report WE deviations in companies sustainability reports are discussed. It is concluded that initial use of this KPI, according to management, fills an identified gap, it provides the management with a usable tool for systematic work environment overview and it supports their informed decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ILO: World statistics, work-related accidents or diseases. https://www.ilo.org/moscow/areas-of-work/occupational-safety-and-health/WCMS_249278/lang–en/index.htm. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  2. Tan, B.K., Tan Wee, J., Remes, J., Takala, J.: Cost Estimates Based on ILO Global Estimates on the Burden of Accidents and Diseases at Work and Disability Adjusted Life Years. Workplace Safety and Health Institute, Singapore (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osvalder, A.-L., Rose, L., Karlsson, S.: Methods (chap. 9). In: Bohgard, M., et al. (eds.) Work and Technology on Human Terms. Prevent. (Work Environment in Association with the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, LO & PTK), Stockholm, Sweden (2009). ISBN 978-91-7365-058-8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garg, A., Moore, J.S., Kapellusch, J.M.: The revised StrainIndex: an improved upper extremity exposure assessment model. Ergonomics 60(7), 912–922 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1237678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rose, L.M., Eklund, J., Nord Nilsson, L., Barman, L., Lind, C.M.: The RAMP package for MSD risk management in manual handling – a freely accessible tool, with website and training courses. Appl. Ergon. 86, 103101 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IA-system, a web-based risk Management system. Developed by AFA Insurance in collaboration with the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, the Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO), the Council for Negotiation and Co-operation (PTK) and the sectors. https://www.afaforsakring.se/forebyggande/ia/informationsmaterial/. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  7. AFA Insurance, Occupational injury statistics 2020. https://www.afaforsakring.se/forebyggande/analys-och-statistik/arsrapport-skadestatistik/. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  8. Goggins, R.W., Spielholz, P., Nothstein, G.L.: Estimating the effectiveness of ergonomics interventions through case studies: implications for predictive cost-benefit analysis. J. Saf. Res. 39, 339–344 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Systematic Work Environment Management (AFS 2001:1Eng), Provisions. https://www.av.se/en/work-environment-work-and-inspections/publications/foreskrifter/systematic-work-environment-management-afs-20011-provisions/. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 31000:2009, Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haxby, E., Hunter, D., Jaggar, S.: An Introduction to Clinical Governance and Patient Safety. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borys, D.: University of Ballarat, Australia. Exploring risk-awareness as a cultural approach to safety: exposing the gap between work as imagined and work as actually performed (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jen, R.: How to increase risk awareness. Paper Presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, (2012). https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/increase-risk-awareness-6067. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  14. Heinrich, H.W.: Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yorio, P.L, Moore, S.M.: Examining Factors that Influence the Existence of Heinrich’s Safety Triangle Using Site-Specific H&S Data from More than 25,000 Establishments. Risk Analysis, vol. 38, no. 4 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bohgard, M., et al. (eds.): Work and technology on human terms. Prevent. (Work Environment in Association with the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, LO & PTK), Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 621–622 (2009). ISBN 978-91-7365-058-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Törner, M., Pousette, A.: Safety in construction – a comprehensive description of the characteristics of high safety standards in construction work, from the combined perspective of supervisors and experienced workers. J. Saf. Res. 40(6), 399–409 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis. From voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting. https://www.tillvaxtanalys.se/in-english/publications/pm/pm/2018-12-14-from-voluntary-to-mandatory-sustainability-reporting.html. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  19. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, Sustainable Employee Engagement (HME – Modell in Swedish, HME survey in English). https://skr.se/arbetsgivarekollektivavtal/uppfoljninganalys/hallbartmedarbetarengagemanghme/enkatfragorhme/hmeenkatenpaengelska.588.html. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  20. The Swedish Work Environment Authority and the Swedish Social Insurance Agency’s e-service for reporting work-related injuries, definition of injuries. https://anmalarbetsskada.se/. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  21. The National Society for Road Safety. https://ntf.se/sok?q=risk%20awareness. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  22. Greig, M., Searcy, C., Neumann, W.P.: “Exploring the Need for a Work Environment Reporting Standard – Development of a Prototype Assessment Approach” Public Report for the Canadian Standards Association Group (CSA) (2020). https://www.csagroup.org/wp-content/uploads/CSA-Group-Research-Work-Environment-Reporting-Standard.pdf. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  23. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Cited 2018, October 26. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 05 Feb 2021

  24. The Swedish Government’s work environment strategy 2021. https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/arbetsmiljostrategin/en-ny-arbetsmiljostrategi—folj-regeringens–arbete/. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Rose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Franzon, H., Rose, L.M. (2021). The SRA Index (Sustainable Risk Awareness Index): A New KPI for Management Support. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics