Skip to main content

Using Knowledge Work Intensity Assessment to Improve the Effectiveness of Quality Assurance in New Drug Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Abstract

Research and development of new pharmaceutical products are very knowledge-intensive activities, which require an efficient quality assurance process. The trade-off between quality and time to market is increasingly critical, which generates stress in the face of the risks associated with delays in quality assurance or even longer delays if the regulatory agency rejects the proposal. To help resolve this dilemma in a company involved in the research, production and marketing of biopharmaceuticals, we assessed the knowledge intensity required for quality assurance. This was achieved by breaking down the quality assurance process into tasks and evaluating each of these tasks according to the dimensions of required qualification, autonomy, innovation, information intensity, interdependencies and decision variability. The most demanding dimensions founded in the study were information intensity and innovation, while level of autonomy was low. A content analysis technique was incorporated to uncover the knowledge present in the many documents of past technical reviews. This revealed the main sources of delays in past quality assurance processes and support findings proactive decisions. The working system was redesigned to facilitate the harmonisation of criteria and the presentation of the scientific basis of the results, thereby strengthening interdependencies, information analysis, innovation capacity and qualification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qureshi, Z.P., Seoane‐Vazquez, E., Rodriguez‐Monguio, R., Stevenson, K.B., Szeinbach, S.L.: Market withdrawal of new molecular entities approved in the United States from 1980 to 2009. Pharmacoe R. Pidemiol. Drug Saf. 20(7), 772–777 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.2155

  2. Siramshetty, V.B., Nickel, J., Omieczynski, C., Gohlke, B.O., Drwal, M.N., Preissner, R.: WITHDRAWN––a resource for withdrawn and discontinued drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1192

  3. Nagaich, U., Sadhna, D.: Drug recall: an incubus for pharmaceutical companies and most serious drug recall of history. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 5(1), 13–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suja, C., Manoj, N., Shuhaib, B., Rishana, K.V., Nidina, P., Ashfaque, M.: A Review on drug disaster in the history of medicine. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 8(4), 481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00080.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ICH. Q8(R2). Pharmaceutical Development (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zurdo, J.: Toward a two-tier process-development paradigm: prototype versus commercial biomanufacturing. Pharm. Bioprocess 3(3), 179–183 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drucker, P.F.: Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. California Manag. Rev. XLI(2), 79–94 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramírez, Y., Steudel, H.J.: Measuring knowledge work: the knowledge work quantification framework. J. Intellect. Capital 9(4), 564–584 (2008). www.emeraldinsight.com/1469-1930.htm

  9. Rodríguez Hernández, A.G., Casares Li, R., Viña Brito, S.: La evaluación de la intensidad de trabajo de conocimiento en la ingeniería industrial. In: Memorias del VII Simposio de Ingeniería Industrial y Afines. La Habana: ISPJAE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez-Hernández, A.G., Casares-Li, R., Viña-Brito, S.J., Rodríguez-Abril, O.: Diseño de ayudas al trabajador del conocimiento. Ingeniería Ind. 36(2) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Echevarría Molina, C., Hernández Apaulaza, R., Garza Ríos, R.: Statistical analysis in the evaluation of intensity of knowledge work. In: 11th International Workshop on Operations Research, Universidad de La Habana, Havana, 10th–13th March (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Casares-Li, R., Rodríguez-Hernández, A.G., Viña-Brito, S.: Análisis de errores humanos mediante la tecnología TEREH: experiencias en su aplicación. Ingeniería Ind. 37(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Casares-Li, R., Rodríguez-Hernández, A.G., Viña-Brito, S.: Knowledge patterns to support ergonomic treatment of human error: technology TErEH. In: Boring, R.L. (ed.) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance, pp. 88–98. Springer, Switzerland (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs, R.L.: Knowledge work and human resource development. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 16(2), 176–202 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Falzon, P.: Ergonomics, knowledge development and the design of enabling environments. In: Proceedings of the Humanizing Work and Work Environment HWWE 2005 Conference, Guwahati, India, 10–12 December, pp. 1–8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvio Viña-Brito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Viña-Brito, S., Rodríguez-Hernández, A.G., Viña-Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez, Y. (2021). Using Knowledge Work Intensity Assessment to Improve the Effectiveness of Quality Assurance in New Drug Development. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics