Skip to main content

What is a Good Scenario in Vocational Training Design? Considerations Based on a Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 219))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The notion of scenario runs through many more or less formalised currents in the domain of vocational training design. However, the notion of scenario and scriptwriting (i.e., scenario design) does not seem to have stabilised well in ergonomics and in the field of vocational training. With this in mind, we conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature in the field of vocational training in order to better understand how authors define these notions of scenario and scriptwriting and how they report on them in their publications. Using the systematic literature review methodology PRISMA, we identified a corpus of 91 scientific articles over the period 2000–2019 from an initial corpus of 1051 articles. We present here the first results of this work by highlighting the main aspects of the definitions attributed to the concept of scenario. We then focus on 17 characteristics which govern what the authors consider to be a “good scenario”. Finally, we focus on the most quoted characteristics of a good scenario: realism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boccara, V., Delgoulet, C.: Works analysis in training design. How ergonomics helps to orientate upstream design of virtual training environments. Activités 12(2), 137–158 (2015). https://www.activites.org/v12n2/V12n2.pdf

  2. Couix, C., Boccara, V., Fucks, I.: Training design for a proposed job of operating the remote monitoring system for risk prevention (RMSRP) in French nuclear power plants. In: Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA, Melbourne, 9–14 August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boccara, V., Delmas, R., Darses, F.: L’ergo-scénarisation : un enjeu majeur des environnements virtuels de formation. Revue du Service de santé des armées 45(5), 603–611 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stacy, W., Freeman, J.: Training objective packages: enhancing the effectiveness of experiential training. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 17(2), 149–168 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Burns, J.J., Salas, E., Pruitt, J.S.: Advanced technology in scenario-based training. In: Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. (eds.) Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training, pp. 365–374. American Psychological Association (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/10278-014

  6. DoE: Training Program Handbook: A Systematic Approach to Training. DoE, Washington (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peeters, M., van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.J.C., Neerincx, M.A.: The design and effect of automated directions during scenario-based training. Comput. Educ. 70, 173–183 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daniellou, F.: L’ergonomie dans la conduite de projets de conception de systèmes de travail. Ergonomie, 359–373 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent, C.J., Blandford, A.: Usability standards meet scenario-based design: challenges and opportunities. J. Biomed. Inform. 53, 243–250 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson, J., Buisine, S., Aoussat, A., Gazo, C.: Generating prospective scenarios of use in innovation projects. Le travail humain 77(1), 21–38 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Turoff, M., Bañuls, V.A., Plotnick, L., Hiltz, S.R., de la Huerga, M.R.: A collaborative dynamic scenario model for the interaction of critical infrastructures. Futures 84, 23–42 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duguay, P., Cloutier, E., Levy, M., Massicotte, P.: Profil statistique des affections vertébrales avec indemnités dans l’industrie de la construction au Québec. Le travail humain 64(4), 321–342 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Distefano, N., Leonardi, S.: A list of accident scenarios for three legs skewed intersections. IATSS Res. 42(3), 97–104 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Prisma group: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6(7), e1000097 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao, S.H., Ho, Y.P.: A knowledge-based architecture for implementing collaborative problem-solving methods in military e-training. Expert Syst. Appl. 35(3), 976–990 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borders, J., Polander, N., Klein, G., Wright, C.: ShadowBoxTM: flexible training to impart the expert mindset. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1574–1579 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wray, R.E., Folsom-Kovarik, J.T., Woods, A., Jones, R.M.: Motivating narrative representation for training cross-cultural interaction. Procedia Manuf. 3, 4121–4128 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan, P.G., Schaheen, L.W., Chan, E.G., Cook, C.C., Luketich, J.D., D’Cunha, J.: Technology-enhanced simulation improves trainee readiness transitioning to cardiothoracic training. J. Surg. Educ. 75(5), 1395–1402 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saint-Dizier de Almeida, V.: Comment améliorer la compréhension de l’entretien d’annonce de diagnostics médicaux sérieux. Activités 10(10–2) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Macris, A.M.: Enhancing enterprise resource planning users’ understanding through ontology-based training. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 5(5–6), 404–422 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bañuls, V.A., Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R.: Collaborative scenario modeling in emergency management through cross-impact. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80(9), 1756–1774 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lesch, M.F.: A comparison of two training methods for improving warning symbol comprehension. Appl. Ergon. 39(2), 135–143 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haugland, V.L., Reime, M.H.: Scenario-based simulation training as a method to increase nursing students’ competence in demanding situations in dementia care. A mixed method study. Nurse Educ. Pract. 33, 164–171 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McKittrick, J.T., Kinney, S., Lima, S., Allen, M.: The first 3 minutes: optimising a short realistic paediatric team resuscitation training session. Nurse Educ. Pract. 28, 115–120 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones, B., Potter, C.: Applying best practice in simulation: critical care response team training. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 13(9), 442–445 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindgren, C.: Do you know your outcome of realistic scenario training? Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 46, 863–869 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bierer, J., Memu, E., Leeper, W.R., Fortin, D., Fréchette, E., Inculet, R., Malthaner, R.: Development of an in situ thoracic surgery crisis simulation focused on nontechnical skill training. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 106(1), 287–292 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Boccara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boccara, V., Perez Toralla, M.S. (2021). What is a Good Scenario in Vocational Training Design? Considerations Based on a Literature Review. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74602-5_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74602-5_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74602-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics