Skip to main content

Negotiating Whitehood: Identity and Resistance in Rhodesian Theatre 1950–1980

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theatre from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe

Part of the book series: Contemporary Performance InterActions ((CPI))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews the normative construction of colonial resistance by analysing how white theatre practitioners, in Rhodesia, resisted and defied official practices of separate development and racial segregation. It explores how the field of cultural production provided an opportunity for intercultural and interracial synergies, which dismantled the official binary construction of social relations in Rhodesia. Using a post-colonialist gaze, the chapter reveals how contamination, hybridity and interculturalism were used as strategies of resistance which in turn defined notions of whitehood from within. The chapter, therefore, argues that the colonial project was resisted from within yet this aspect of colonial resistance has received scant academic attention. The paper looks at the works of prominent directors such as Ken Marshall, Adrian Stanley, Monica Maarsden and Daniel Pearce, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We locate this study in this period because at this time Rhodesia witnessed the development of a white liberal community that was opposed to the hard-core racial and separatist policies of the state. Moreover, most dramatic associations became autonomous, relying on their own theatre houses which gave them the liberty to violate discriminatory policies. There is a lot of evidence of such from this period. It precedes and incorporates the era of the liberation struggle, which makes it interesting to investigate resistance in a period that was politically charged.

  2. 2.

    Anyone, whether black or white, who was a citizen of Rhodesia between 1890 and 1980 was referred to as a Rhodesian. However, ‘Rhodesian’ is used in this chapter in the way that it is now commonly used in Zimbabwe as a descriptor for any white person who had Rhodesian citizenship. Rhodesianness is not a singular category which accommodates only English white people. ‘Rhodesian’ is broad enough to include Jewish, Afrikaner, continental European immigrants and whites retreating from decolonisation elsewhere in Africa and Asia, who came to reside in Rhodesia. Rhodesian is still used to describe a white person who lived in Rhodesia during the colonial period and still believes in a discourse that sustained Rhodesia (i.e., an unrepentant white person). The colloquialism ‘Rhodie’ is still used for the same purpose.

  3. 3.

    We deliberately give examples from the 1890s to illustrate the keenness of the state to control fields of cultural production in the formative years of Rhodesia. This allows us to demonstrate the changes that took place in the 1950s when settler theatre was reasonably well established.

  4. 4.

    ‘Contamination’ is a term we borrow from Diana Brydon (1995). It is a strategy of disrupting the purity of the ‘self’ as a cultural entity.

  5. 5.

    Pearce (1972, p. vii) notes that the storyline was based on the real-life story of Evison Muti, who starred as the lead actor in 1973. The generational conflict between Sebastian Chiridzo and his parents, Moses Chiridzo and Lena Chiridzo, over the control of his future after educating him is a story or theme with which most students could identify.

  6. 6.

    The play was openly political as it quoted verbatim Prime Minister Smith, Minister of Information Pieter Kenyon Flemming, Minister of Justice Pieter van der Byl and Minister of Law and Order Desmond Lardner.

  7. 7.

    Adapted from an anti-apartheid novel written By Alan Paton. The play highlights colonial oppression and the need of blacks to liberate themselves.

  8. 8.

    Bill Louw (2011) indicates that after the staging of Julius Caesar in which Charles Mungoshi acted as Trebonius, Adrian Stanley was asked to come and explain himself to Prime Minister Smith as to why he had allowed Africans to see and act in a play that talked about insurrection against the political establishment.

References

  • Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 1995. Post-colonial studies reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Teresa A. 1992. The fight for control of African women’s mobility in colonial Zimbabwe 1900–1939. Signs 17 (3): 586–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brydon, Diana. 1995. The white Inuits speak: Contamination as literary strategy. In Post-colonial studies reader, ed. Bill Ashcroft, Griffiths Gareth, and Helen Tiffin, 136–141. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, Robert. 1975. The story of Reps—The history of Salisbury Repertory Players: 1931–1975. Salisbury: Galaxie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, John L. 1997. Images of empire, contest and conscience: Models of domination in South Africa. In Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world, ed. A.N. Stoler and F. Cooper, 163–197. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. 1976. Criticism and ideology: A study in Marxist literary theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, Peter, and Ian Hancock. 1993. ‘Rhodesians never die’: The impact of war and political change on white Rhodesia, c 1970–1980. Harare: Baobab Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1999. Essential classics in politics. London: Electric Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. 1987. The age of empire, 1875–1914. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Roy. 1981. A black future for theatre, interview with Adrian Stanley. Arts Zimbabwe 2: 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarsholm, Prebren. 1990a. Cultural struggle and development in southern Africa. London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarsholm, Prebren. 1990b. Mental colonisation or catharsis? Theatre, democracy and cultural struggle from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies 16 (2): 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, David. 1995. African popular theatre: From pre-colonial times to the present day. Oxford: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, Bill. 2011. Interview with Kelvin Chikonzo. University of Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makwenda, Joyce. 2005. Zimbabwe township music. Harare: Storytime Promotions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtisi, Joseph, Munyaradzi Nyakudya, and Teresa Barnes. 2009. Social and economic developments during the UDI period. In Becoming Zimbabwe: A history from the pre-colonial period to 2008, ed. Brian Raftopoulos and Alois Mlambo, 115–140. Harare: Weaver Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Daniel. 1972. Generation gap: Two plays. Gweru: Mambo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Daniel. 1977. Who is John Moyo? Thoughts on black theatre in Zimbabwe. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 11 (3): 54–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastow, Jane. 1996. African Theatre and Politics: The evolution of theatre in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zimbabwe: A comparative study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravengai, Samuel. 2006. An investigation into the practice of directing and theatre making in post-independence Zimbabwe up to 1990: Some urban theatre directors and/or theatre makers as case studies. Zambezia 33 (2): 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravengai, Samuel. 2010. ‘Unhappily, we are afraid of it’: Modernism as deracination on the Rhodesian/Zimbabwean stage. African Identities 8 (2): 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravengai, Samuel. 2011. Subalternity and the negotiation of a theatre identity: Performing the postcolony in alternative Zimbabwean theatre. Doctor of Philosophy thesis. University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Elizabeth. 1992. Peasants, traders and wives: Shona women in the history of Zimbabwe, 1870–1939. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seda, Owen. 2011. Interculturalism in post-colonial Zimbabwean drama: Projections of an alternative theatre at the onset of the new millennium. Doctor of Philosophy thesis. Harare: University of Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, Jenny. 1995. Figures of colonial resistance. In Post-colonial studies reader, eds. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin, 99–103. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemon, Stephen. 1995. Unsettling the empire: Resistance theory for the second world. In Post-colonial studies reader, ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, 104–110. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, Anny N., and Frederick Cooper. 1997. Between metropole and colony: Rethinking a research agenda. In Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world, ed. Frederick Cooper and Anny Stoler, 1–56. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleri, Sarah. 1995. The rhetoric of English India. In Post-colonial studies reader, ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, 111–113. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1968. The history of Rhodesian entertainment 1890–1930. Salisbury: M. O. Collins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimunya, Musaemura B. 2011. Interview with Kelvin Chikonzo, University of Zimbabwe, August 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Ravengai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chikonzo, K., Ravengai, S. (2021). Negotiating Whitehood: Identity and Resistance in Rhodesian Theatre 1950–1980. In: Ravengai, S., Seda, O. (eds) Theatre from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. Contemporary Performance InterActions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74594-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics