Skip to main content
Book cover

Hegemonic Transition pp 43–65Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Broken Social Contract: The Domestic Roots of US Hegemonic Decline in the World

  • 278 Accesses

Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations book series (PSIR)

Abstract

When the US established the liberal world order after 1945, it did so on the basis of successful domestic economic and social policies that provided Americans with unprecedented levels of economic growth and participation, as well as increasing social protection. While enjoying the blessings of a widely-uncontested technological leadership, successful countercyclical policies, and growing opportunities in the economic system, US citizens supported American-led multilateral trade liberalization that exposed US labor markets to the cold winds of international competition. The domestic social and economic premises of this socio-economic contract started to crumble in the 1970s. Long-lasting stagflation and mass unemployment challenged the fiscal basis of the welfare regime. The neoliberal turn of the 1980s led to a demolition of welfare services, while the introduction of supply-side economics refocused government policies away from protecting workers to courting global investors. Through financial account liberalization, the demise of the Bretton Woods system invited yet another dimension of international competition that resulted in a power shift from labor to capital. Finally, in a “flat world,” emerging economies constrained the West’s technological and production leadership. Firstly, this chapter argues that the broken socio-economic contract at home made Americans prone to messages of economic nationalism and a retreat from US liberal hegemony in international trade policies. Secondly, the chapter argues that declining support for US-led multilateral trade policies, which emerged over a period of many decades, did not only start with the Trump presidency in 2017, but was synchronized with the deterioration of domestic socio-economic conditions since the 1970s. Finally, and most importantly, this chapter contends that, while long-term structural changes have seriously challenged the domestic social and economic premises of the social contract in the last 50 years, it was the striking policy failure to address these challenges adequately that sets the US experience apart from other more responsive OECD countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74505-9_3
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-74505-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaronson, D., Mazumder, B., & Schechter, S. (2010). What is behind the rise in long-term unemployment? Economic Perspectives, 34(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., & Guger, A. (2006). Which socio-economic model for Europe? Intereconomics, 41(1), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. (2016). The China shock: Learning from labor market adjustment to large changes in trade. NBER Working Paper 21906. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w21906. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Baldwin, R. E. (1952). The new welfare economics and gains in international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66(1), 91–101.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., & Low, P. (Eds.). (2009). Multilateralizing regionalism: Challenges for the global trading system. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives of Politics, 3(1), 15–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bekker, S., & Wilthagen, T. (2008). Flexicurity—A European approach to labour market policy. Intereconomics, 43(2), 68–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Patrick, H. (Eds.). (1991). Aggressive unilateralism: America’s 301 trade policy and the world trading system. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, F. L. (1977). The origins of international economic disorder: A study of United States international monetary policy from World War II to the present. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. D. (1993). The Bretton Woods international monetary system: A historical overview. In M. D. Bordo & B. Eichengreen (Eds.), A retrospective on the Bretton Woods system: Lessons for international monetary reform (pp. 3–108). University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, R. (2018). The Trump administration and the future of the WTO. Yale Journal of International Law Online. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3328929. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Collins, J. L., & Mayer, V. (2010). Both hands tied: Welfare reform and the race to the bottom in the low-wage labor market. University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Economic Advisers. (2016). Economic report of the president: Annual Report. The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/02/22/2016-economic-report-president. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Dervis, K. (2012). Convergence, interdependence, and divergence. Finance & Development, 49(3), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., & Bieber, T. (2020). Bildungspolitik. Zwischen Wettbewerb und sozialem Zusammenhalt. In C. Lammert, M. Siewert, & B. Vormann (Eds.), Handbuch Politik USA (pp. 447–464), VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falke, A. (2017). Handelspolitik. In T. Jäger (Ed.). Die Außenpolitik der USA (pp. 223–240). VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falke, A. (2019). Die US-Handelspolitik unter Präsident Trump: Abschied von den USA als Ordnungsmacht im Welthandelssystem. Zeitschrift Für Außen- Und Sicherheitspolitik, 10(S2), 37–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1965, December 31). We are all Keynesians now. Time Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2005, April 3). It’s a flat world, after all. The New York Times, pp. 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluck, W., & Werner, W. (Eds.). (2003). Wie viel Ungleichheit verträgt die Demokratie? Armut und Reichtum in den USA. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, E., & Wrighton, J. M. (1998). Thinking globally or acting locally? Determinants of the GATT vote in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(1), 33–55.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Margo, R. A. (1991). The great compression: The wage structure in the United States at mid-century. NBER Working Paper 3817. https://www.nber.org/papers/w3817. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Grell, B., & Lammert, C. (2013). Sozialpolitik in den USA: Eine Einführung. VS Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (1994). The world of money: The political economy of international capital mobility. Policy Science, 27(4), 295–298.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, J. (2013). Flexicurity in crisis: European labour market policies in a time of austerity. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(1), 71–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Junker, D. (2009). Das auserwählte Volk. Geschichte und nationale Identität der USA. In P. Gassert, D. Junker, W. Mausbach, & M. Thunert (Eds.), Was Amerika ausmacht: Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 19–32). Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. F. (1963). Remarks in Heber Springs, Arkansas, at the dedication of Greers Ferry Dam. https://www.jfklibrary.org/asset-viewer/archives/JFKWHA/1963/JFKWHA-228-003/JFKWHA-228-003. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2015). International trade theory and policy. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C. (2017). A path to health care reform: Obama und die Reform des US-amerikanischen Gesundheitssystems. Zeitschrift Für Außen- Und Sicherheitspolitik, 10(S2), 65–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C. (2020). The crisis of democracy: The United Sates in Perspective. In B. Vormann, & M. D. Weinman (Eds.), The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 124–139). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C., & Leimbigler, B. (2020). Gesundheitspolitik. Zwischen Markt und Staat. In C. Lammert, M. Siewert, & B. Vormann (Eds.), Handbuch Politik USA (pp. 465–479). VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, R. (1988). The challenge to US leadership in high-technology industries. NBER Working Paper 2513. National Bureau for Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w2513. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Meinderts, T. (2020). The power of Section 301: The Reagan tariffs in an age of economic globalization. Globalizations, 17(4), 746–758.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E. G., & Tesar, L. L. (1998). The international ramifications of tax reforms: Supply-side economics in a global economy. American Economic Review, 88(1), 226–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, T. (2016). Remaking the rust belt: The postindustrial transformation of North America. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2010). The futures of American power-dominance and decline in perspective. Foreign Affairs, 89(6), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Divided we stand—Why inequality keeps rising. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264119536-en. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • OECD. (2018, June). OECD Economic Surveys, United States. http://www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/Overview-United-States-2018-OECD.pdf. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, L. W. (1995). Capital mobility, state autonomy and political legitimacy. Journal of International Affairs, 48(2), 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state?: Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1891). Principles of political economy and taxation. G. Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Santoni, G. J. (1986). The Employment Act of 1946: Some history notes. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 68(9), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. (2005, September 5). Globalisation and the reform of European social models. ECOFIN Informal Meeting, Manchester. Bruegel. https://graspe.eu/SapirPaper.pdf. Accessed 21 November 2020.

  • Schweller, R. L., & Pu, X. (2011). After unipolarity: China’s visions of international order in an era of US decline. International Security, 36(1), 41–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). Trump and globalization. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(3), 515–528.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (2015). States and markets. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. (2012, July 15). Land of opportunity can fight inequality. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/24024920-cce3-11e1-9960-00144feabdc0?wpisrc=nl_wonk#axzz20nwE6DXo. Accessed 18 November 2020.

  • Tanzi, V. (2002). Globalization and the future of social protection. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(1), 116–127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Temin, P. (1990). Lessons from the great depression: The Lionel Robbins lectures for 1989. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (2000). Ending welfare as we know it. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W. (2004). Globalisierung und Globalisierungs-backlash. Ein Vergleich zur Zeit vor 1914. In R. Ohr (Ed.), Globalisierung – Herausforderungen an die Wirtschaftspolitik (pp. 9–46). Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W. (2015). Von der Einkommensarmut zur sozialen Ausgrenzung: Sozialpolitischer Paradigmenwechsel im späten 20. Jahrhundert. In G. Schulz (Ed.), Arm und Reich: Beiträge zur gesellschaftlichen und wirtschaftlichen Ungleichheit in der Geschichte (pp. 271–292). Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W. (2019). The Trump phenomenon: Economic causes and remedies. In W. Werner (Ed.) Annual report HCA 2018–2019 (pp. 170–188). Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W., & Pierenkemper, T. (Eds.). (2002). Wirtschaftspolitik nach dem Ende der Bretton Woods-Ära (= Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte (1) 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Welf Werner

  2. John F. Kennedy Institute for North American Studies (JFKI), Freie Universität (FU) Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Christian Lammert

Authors
  1. Welf Werner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Lammert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Welf Werner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science , University of Kaiserslautern , Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Florian Böller

  2. Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Welf Werner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Werner, W., Lammert, C. (2021). Broken Social Contract: The Domestic Roots of US Hegemonic Decline in the World. In: Böller, F., Werner, W. (eds) Hegemonic Transition. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74505-9_3

Download citation