Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Family Interactions with Biodiversity in a Natural History Museum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Addressing Wicked Problems through Science Education

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 8))

Abstract

Natural history museums (NHM) have the largest collection of extinct and extant biodiversity. The specimens represent biodiversity in the moment and in that space for the visitors. Traditionally, NHM provided visitors contact with representatives of biodiversity, but that is no longer enough. The interactions the object triggers are as important as the presentation of the object. We applied actor-network theory and observations to define how 190 families (305 children, 273 adults) interacted with the Museum für Naturkunde (Berlin, Germany) Biodiversity Wall. We found gender and age of the actors may be predictors for the interactions occurring in relation to the boundary object (exhibit). To delineate the family interactions at an exhibit, we developed the term synergy of the unresponsive. Family members may view the same exhibit at the same time, but their interactions with the boundary object may not result in conversation among all actors. The unresponsive actors in the group will influence the synergy, or developing interactions. Diverging interest in the boundary object becomes a conflict, and the result is the family does not interact at the exhibit. Defining the synergy of the unresponsive may provide a breakthrough in techniques and strategies for coaxing visitor interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamides, E. (2015). Linking operations strategy to the corporate strategy process: A practice perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 21(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2013-0107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Sa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrosino, M. V. (2008). Exploring oral history: A window on the past. Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., & Glover, D. (2017). Power in practice: Insights from technography and actor-network theory for agricultural sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 100. STEPS Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astor-Jack, T., Whaley, K. L., Dierking, K., Perry, L. D., & D. L., & Gariby, C. (2007). Investigating socially mediated learning. In J. Falk, L. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 217–228). AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajde, D. (2013). Consumer culture theory (re) visits actor–network theory: Flattening consumption studies. Marketing Theory, 13(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593113477887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J. B., Strange, N., & Helles, F. (2014). Revealing lay people’s perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method. Global Ecology and Conservation, 1, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, N., & Thrift, N. (2000). The geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres. In M. Crang & N. J. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space (pp. 281–301). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, E., & Patrick, P. (2014). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ experiences in outdoor ‘places’ and intentions for teaching in the outdoors. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2243–2264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.918294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (2004). Outdoor ecology education and pupils’ environmental perception in preservation and utilization. Science Education International, 15(1), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchel, B., & Raub, S. (2002). Building knowledge-creating value networks. European Management Journal, 20(6), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00110-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(S1), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, T. (2012). Learning to protect: Environmental education in a South Indian Tiger Reserve. Anthropology of environmental education. Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. H., Bønnelycke, J., Mygind, L., & Bentsen, P. (2015). Museums and science centres for health: From scientific literacy to health promotion. Museum Management and Curatorship, 31(1), 17–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2015.1110710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, T. H. (2020). Actor-network theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature (pp. 1–3). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, D. C. (1996). Defining biodiversity. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973–2006), 24(4), 738–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagles, P., & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen, K. M., Luke, J. J., & Dierking, L. D. (2004). Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Science Education, 88(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20015

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Museum experience revisited. Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: Implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation, 136(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.2.183.12514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, B. (2010). Case study research methods. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, A., & Sardo, A. M. (2017). What works in the field? Evaluating informal science events. Frontiers in Communication, 2, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2017.00022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2010). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. re.press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E., & Winterbottom, M. (2018). ‘Why do parrots talk?’ Co-investigation as a model for promoting family learning through conversation in a natural history gallery. Journal of Biological Education, 52(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1408934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, A., & Medvecky, F. (2015). Unfinished science in museums: A push for critical science literacy. Journal of Science Communication, 14(2), A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14020204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. M., & Brehm, J. (2003). Brief comment: Qualitative insight into public knowledge of, and concern with, biodiversity. Human Ecology, 31(2), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idema, J., & Patrick, P. G. (2016a). Family conversations at an orangutan exhibit: The influence of zoo educators. Journal of International Zoo Educators, 52, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idema, J., & Patrick, P. G. (2016b). Visitor experiences during a science-themed community event. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & K. Hahl (Eds.), Electronic proceedings of the ESERA 2015 conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 9 (co-ed. M, Achiam & G. Carvalho) (pp. 1241–1250). University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenborn, B. P., Gundersen, V., Stange, E., Hagen, D., & Skogen, K. (2016). Public perceptions of biodiversity in Norway: From recognition to stewardship? Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 70(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2015.1114518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management and Policy Networks, 2(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030000000007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, K., & Lappalainen, A. (2004). Examining the environment awareness of children and adolescents in the Ranomafana region, Madagascar. Environmental Education Research, 10(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620242000198177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropf, M. B. (2016). The family museum experience: A review of the literature. Patterns in practice: Selections from the Journal of Museum Education, 14(2), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.1989.11510105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Bose, E. (2008). How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Human Ecology, 36(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyau, A., & Schmeller, D. S. (2017). Positive sentiment and knowledge increase tolerance towards conservation actions. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(2), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1253-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MfN (Museum für Naturkunde). (2012). Museum für Naturkunde 2020: Our strategy for an integrated research. Museum für Naturkunde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P. G. (2014a). The informal learning model: A sociocultural perspective of questioning pathways. Journal of International Zoo Educators, 50(2014), 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P. G. (2017). Sense of conservation: When is a black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta) really just a black snake? In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators: Perspectives from science communication and education (pp. 545–559). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P. G. (2014b). The informal learning model: A sociocultural perspective of questioning pathways. Journal of International Zoo Educators, 50(2014), 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P. G., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2013). Zoo talk. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, K. J. (1977). Complex decision problems: An integrated strategy for resolution. Reston Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakotomamonjy, S. N., Jones, J. P. G., Razafimanahaka, J. H., Ramamonjisoa, B., & Williams, S. J. (2015). The effects of environmental education on children’s and parents’ knowledge and attitudes towards lemurs in rural Madagascar. Animal Conservation, 18(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadoss, A., & Poyyamoli, G. (2011). Biodiversity conservation through environmental education for sustainable development: A case study from Puducherry, India. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. Y. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Río, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorin, R., & Gordon, I. J. (2010). Frogs in the drain—children’s perceptions of the tropical landscape. Etropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.9.0.2010.3426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm, K. R., Clark, F., & Eblacas, P. R. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2016, September). An actor-network theory of boundary objects: Construction and disappearance. Paper presented at the meeting of the British Academy of Management, Newcastle, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugulu, I., & Aydin, Y. (2011). Research in students’ traditional knowledge about medicinal plants: Case study of high schools in Izmir, Turkey. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 1(9), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugulu, I., Aydin, H., Yorek, N., & Dogan, Y. (2008). The impact of endemism concept on environmental attitudes of secondary school students. Natura Montenegrina, 7(3), 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzick, R., & Patrick, P. G. (2018). Family discourse on an arboretum nature trail: Explorers, protectors, rememberers, and sticky features. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1393119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, G. (1997). Tacos, tiendas and mezcal. An actor-network perspective on small-scale entrepreneurial projects in Western Mexico. [Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University]. https://edepot.wur.nl/138383

  • Vodouhê, F. G., Coulibaly, O., Adégbidi, A., & Sinsin, B. (2010). Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(7), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists…in their own words (pp. 209–218). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. Y., & Wall, G. (2017). Visiting heritage museums with children: Chinese parents’ motivations. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2016.1201085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, H. T., McClain, L. R., & Crowl, M. (2013). Understanding how families use magnifiers during nature center walks. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1917–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9334-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education and Health Professions at Columbus State University, Columbus, GA, USA

    Patricia G. Patrick

  2. Department of Education, Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Berlin, Germany

    Alexandra Moormann

Authors
  1. Patricia G. Patrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Moormann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia G. Patrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Marianne Achiam

  2. Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    Justin Dillon

  3. School of Education, King's College London, London, UK

    Melissa Glackin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Patrick, P.G., Moormann, A. (2021). Family Interactions with Biodiversity in a Natural History Museum. In: Achiam, M., Dillon, J., Glackin, M. (eds) Addressing Wicked Problems through Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74266-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74266-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74265-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74266-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation