Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The RoboDIEP: Robotic-Assisted Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has been the enduring gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction for the better part of 20 years. Yet in spite of advances in imaging, perfusion technology, and technique, some degree of donor site morbidity remains. Abdominal morbidity is due to extension of the fascial incision and muscular dissection to access the full pedicle. Robotic surgery allows a minimally invasive surgical approach to the pedicle which significantly shortens the fascial incision. The robotic system allows careful vascular dissection with a level of precision and reliability that was not previously available using laparoscopy. Reducing the fascial incision and muscular dissection promises to enhance recovery and reduce short-term pain, long-term hernia, and bulge rate. These enhancements of the DIEP flap may represent a significant improvement over current open techniques where baseline levels of abdominal wall morbidity can still be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Damen TH, Mureau MA, Timman R, et al. The pleasing end result after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a review of additional operations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:71–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tønseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41:173–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tønseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Damen TH, Timman R, Kunst EH, et al. High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Damen TH, Wei W, Mureau MA, et al. Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1043–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146:117–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thorarinsson A, Fröjd V, Kölby L, Ljungal J, Taft C, Mark H. Long-term health-related quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparing 4 different methods of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(6):e1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(2):216–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moon HK, Taylor GI. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:815–32. 23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grotting JC. The free abdominoplasty flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27(4):351–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:466–75; discussion 476–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:645–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blondeel PN. One hundred DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Selber JC, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1438–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee BT, Chen C, Nguyen MD, Lin SJ, Tobias AM. A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2010;30:85–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdul-Muhsin H, Patel V. History of robotic surgery. In: Kim CH, editor. Robotics in general surgery. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 3–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, et al. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):153–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies BL, Hibber RD, Ng WS, et al. The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1991;205:35–8. 12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 years of robotic surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:2550–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hagen ME, Stein H, Curet MJ. Introduction to the robotic system. In: Kim CH, editor. Robotics in general surgery. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 9–16. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taffinder N, Smith SGT, Huber J, et al. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1087–92. 23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Mulken TJM, Boymans CAEM, Schols RM, Cau R, Schoenmakers FBF, Hoekstra LT, Qiu SS, Selber JC, van der Hulst RRWJ. Preclinical experience using a new robotic system created for microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):1367–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee KT, Mun GH. Perfusion of the DIEP flaps: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2018;38(1):98e108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor EF, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, Band B, Ramakrishnan VV, Griffiths M. Preoperative computed tomography angiography for planning DIEP flap breast reconstruction reduces operative time and overall complications. Gland Surg. 2016;5(2):93e8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Futter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, et al. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:578–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shubinets V, Fox JP, Sarik JR, et al. Surgically treated hernia following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: prevalence, outcomes, and expenditures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:749–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mennie JC, Mohanna PN, O’Donoghue JM, et al. Donor-site hernia repair in abdominal flap breast reconstruction: a population-based cohort study of 7929 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomouk T, Mohan AT, Azizi A, et al. Donor site morbidity in DIEP free flap breast reconstructions: a comparison of unilateral, bilateral, and bipedicled surgical procedure types. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1505–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ingvaldsen CA, Bosse G, Mynarek GK, et al. Donor-site morbidity after DIEAP flap breast reconstruction-a 2-year postoperative computed tomography comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Uda H, Kamochi H, Sarukawa S, et al. Clinical and quantitative isokinetic comparison of abdominal morbidity and dynamics following DIEP versus muscle-sparing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1101–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ben-Or S, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. Robotic surgical training. Cancer J. 2013;19(2):120–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. da Vinci Surgery Online Community Training Program: da Vinci Surgery Clinical Pathway Surgeons.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lenihan JP. Navigating, credentialing, privileging, and learning curves in robotics with an evidence and experienced-based approach. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54:382–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Sarah N. Bishop & Jesse C. Selber

Authors
  1. Sarah N. Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesse C. Selber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse C. Selber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Jesse C. Selber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bishop, S.N., Selber, J.C. (2021). The RoboDIEP: Robotic-Assisted Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. In: Selber, J.C. (eds) Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74244-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74244-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74243-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74244-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation