Skip to main content

A Common Ground for Human Rights, AI, and Brain and Mental Health

Part of the Advances in Neuroethics book series (AIN)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the current and future challenges of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in brain and mental health by exploring international regulations of healthcare and AI, and how human rights play a role in these regulations. First, a broad perspective of human rights in AI and human rights in healthcare is reviewed, then regulations of AI in healthcare are discussed, and finally applications of human rights in AI and brain and mental health regulations are considered. The foremost challenge in the blending and development of regulations of AI in healthcare is that currently both AI and healthcare lack accepted international-level regulation. It can be argued that human rights and human rights law are for the most part internationally accepted, and we can use these rights as guidelines for global regulations. However, as philosophical and ethical environments vary across nations, subsequent policies reflect varying conceptions and fulfillments of human rights. Like human rights, the recognized definitions of “AI” and “health” can vary across international borders and even vary within the professions themselves. One of the biggest challenges in the future of AI in brain and mental health will be applying human rights in a practical manner. Initially, the thought of applying human rights in the development of AI in healthcare seems straightforward. In order to develop better AI, better healthcare and, thus, better AI in healthcare, one must simply respect the human rights that are granted by various declarations, covenants, and constitutions. This is so seemingly straightforward that one would think this has already been the case in these developing fields. However, as we explore this notion of applying human rights, we find agreement, disagreement, and variability on a global scale. It is these variabilities that may well hamper the ethical development of AI in brain and mental health internationally.

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Healthcare
  • Human rights
  • Neuroethics
  • Brain and mental health

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74188-4_16
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-74188-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  1. United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights. 1948. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  2. African Union. African charter on human and peoples’ rights. 1981. https://au.int/en/treaties/african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  3. AICHR. ASEAN human rights declaration. 2012. https://aichr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ASEAN-Human-Rights-Declaration.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  4. ECHR, Council of Europe. European convention on human rights. 1950. https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  5. European Commission. EU charter of fundamental rights. 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/info/aid-development-cooperation-fundamental-rights/your-rights-eu/eu-charter-fundamental-rights_en. Accessed 24 May 2019.

  6. OHCHR. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. 1966. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  7. Organization of American States. American convention on human rights. 1969. http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.htm. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  8. UNICEF. Convention on the rights of the child. 1989. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  9. United Nations. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1969. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXIII-1&chapter=23&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  10. United Nations. Status of ratification interactive dashboard. 2019. http://indicators.ohchr.org. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  11. Broberg M, Sano HO. Strengths and weaknesses in a human rights-based approach to international development—an analysis of a rights-based approach to development assistance based on practical experiences. Int J Hum Rights. 2018;22(5):664–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Qi Z. Conflicts over human rights between China and the US. Human Rights Quarterly. 2005;27(1):105−124.

    Google Scholar 

  13. United Nations. Human Rights Council Nineteenth session. 2012. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/130/62/PDF/G1213062.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.

  14. Tsang L, Kracov DA, Mulryne J, et al. The impact of artificial intelligence on medical innovation in the European Union and the United States. Intellect Prop Technol Law J. 2017;29(8):3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;4:230–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. 2019. https://www.aomrc.org.uk/reports-guidance/artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare/. Accessed 25 Jul 2019.

  17. Alston P. The populist challenge to human rights. J Hum Rights Pract. 2017;9:1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. United Nations. The human rights based approach to development cooperation towards a common understanding among UN agencies. 2003. https://undg.org/document/the-human-rights-based-approach-to-development-cooperation-towards-a-common-understanding-among-un-agencies/. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  19. Access Now. Human rights in the age of artificial intelligence. 2018. https://www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2018/11/AI-and-Human-Rights.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2019.

  20. Latonero M. Governing artificial intelligence: upholding human rights & dignity. 2018. https://datasociety.net/output/governing-artificial-intelligence/. Accessed 25 Jul 2019.

  21. Risse M. Human rights and artificial intelligence: an urgently needed agenda. 2018. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/human-rights-and-artificial-intelligence-urgently-needed-agenda. Accessed 24 May 2019.

  22. Pielemeier J. AI & global governance: the advantages of applying the international human rights framework to artificial intelligence. In: Digital technology and global order. New York: United Nations University Centre for Policy Research; 2019. https://cpr.unu.edu/ai-global-governance-the-advantages-of-applying-the-international-human-rights-framework-to-artificial-intelligence.html. Accessed 24 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Veen C. Artificial intelligence: what’s human rights got to do with it? In: Data & Society: points. Medium. 2018. https://points.datasociety.net/artificial-intelligence-whats-human-rights-got-to-do-with-it-4622ec1566d5. Accessed 26 Jun 2019.

  24. Future of Life Institute. Asilomar AI principles. 2017. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/. Accessed 24 May 2019.

  25. Canca C. AI & global governance: human rights and AI ethics—why ethics cannot be replaced by the UDHR. In: Digital technology and global order. New York: United Nations University Centre for Policy Research; 2019. https://cpr.unu.edu/ai-global-governance-human-rights-and-ai-ethics-why-ethics-cannot-be-replaced-by-the-udhr.html. Accessed 25 July 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Juškevičius J, Balsienė J. Human rights in healthcare: some remarks on the limits of the right to healthcare. Jurisprudencija: mokslo darbai. 2010;122(4):95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peled-Raz M. Human rights in patient care and public health—a common ground. Public Health Rev. 2017;38:1–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. IMDRF. “Software as a medical device”: possible framework for risk categorization and corresponding considerations. 2014. http://www.imdrf.org/workitems/wi-samd.asp. Accessed 20 May 2019.

  29. FDA. Proposed regulatory framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based software as a medical device (SaMD). 2019. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device. Accessed 20 May 2019.

  30. Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices. 2017. https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/2017-05-05. Accessed 20 Jul 2019.

  31. IEEE. Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, version 2. 2017. https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieeestandards/standards/web/documents/other/ead_ v2.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2019.

  32. Microsoft. Human rights annual report. 2018. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/human-rights. Accessed 26 Jul 2019.

  33. Gilbert F, Cook M, O’Brien T, et al. Embodiment and estrangement: results from a first-in-human “intelligent BCI” trial. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25:83–96.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Luxton D. An introduction to artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care. In: Luxton D, editor. Artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care. 1st ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2016. p. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:389–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Yuste R, Goering S. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature. 2019;551(7679):159–63. https://www.nature.com/news/four-ethical-priorities-for-neurotechnologies-and-ai-1.22960. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  37. Patel VL, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M, et al. The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artif Intell Med. 2009;46(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.017.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mónika Sziron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sziron, M. (2021). A Common Ground for Human Rights, AI, and Brain and Mental Health. In: Jotterand, F., Ienca, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Brain and Mental Health: Philosophical, Ethical & Policy Issues. Advances in Neuroethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74188-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74188-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74187-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74188-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)