Abstract
This chapter discusses the tension between narrower and wider definitions of measurement that emerge from the multiple theories and perspectives on the topic. The chapter discusses how the prototype/graded structure research program, and Wittgenstein’s notion of family resemblance, can help us organize and clarify the multiple relations and differences between alternative approaches to characterizing measurement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is important to clarify that I am in no way implying that we can fully examine qualities through quantitative methods nor quantities through qualitative methods. I am simply stating that the use of either methodology is in principle possible and can yield useful outcomes.
- 2.
Or metrological if its practitioners suddenly start advocating for their right to the throne of the kingdom of measurement.
References
Berka, K. (1983). Measurement: Its concepts, theories, and problems. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dingle, H. (1950). A theory of measurement. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(1), 5–26.
Duncan, O. D. (1984). Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hölder, O. (1901). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass [The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement]. In Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich-Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig: Mathematische-Physische Classe [Reports of the Proceedings of the Royal Saxon Society of Sciences in Leipzig: Mathematical-Physical Division] (Vol. 53, pp. 3–64).
Hornstein, G. A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas, and implications. In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in american psychology (pp. 1–34). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Johnson, H. M. (1936). Pseudo-mathematics in the mental and social sciences. The American Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 342–351.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2012). The international vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms ( vim ) (3rd ed.). Paris: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (2007). Foundations of measurement. Volume I: Additive and polynomial representations. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications Inc. (Original work published 1971).
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (1999). Concepts and cognitive science. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings (pp. 3–81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mari, L. (2013). A quest for the definition of measurement. Measurement, 46(8), 2889–2895.
Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44(12), 1469–1481.
Michell, J. (1997b). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88(3), 355–383.
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Michell, J. (2005). The logic of measurement: A realist overview. Measurement, 38(4), 285–294.
Michell, J. (2012a). “The constantly recurring argument”: Inferring quantity from order. Theory and Psychology, 22(3), 255–271.
Michell, J. (2012b). Alfred Binet and the concept of heterogeneous orders. Frontiers in psychology, 3(261), 1–8.
Michell, J. (2020). Thorndike’s credo: Metaphysics in psychometrics. Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 309–328.
Michell, J., & Ernst, C. (1996). The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement: Translated from Part I of Otto Hölder’s German text “Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40(3), 235–252.
Michell, J., & Ernst, C. (1997). The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement: Translated from Part II of Otto Hölder’s German text “Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(4), 345–356.
Pfanzagl, J. (1968). Theory of measurement. New York: Wiley.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 24–78). Hilldate, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, E. (1999). Reclaiming concepts. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 61–77.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.
Savage, C. W. (1970). The measurement of sensation: A critique of perceptual psychophysics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680.
Wittgenstein, L. (2003). Philosophical investigations: The German text, with a Revised English translation (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing (Original work published 1953).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Torres Irribarra, D. (2021). Measurement: Prototypes and Resemblances. In: A Pragmatic Perspective of Measurement. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74025-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74025-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74024-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74025-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)