Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Military Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defense Economics
  • 455 Accesses

Abstract

Before an actual conflict begins, it is unknown whether and to what extent the military capabilities generated in peacetime can actually provide effective military performance. Only real conflicts allow the armed forces to test the effectiveness of any military capabilities they have generated in the past. Just like a private firm does not know actual turnover until shops report sales figures, information about the effectiveness of military conflicts is not created until an actual conflict begins.

Omnis arbor quae non facit fructum bonum exciditur et in ignem mittitur (Matthew 7:19)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Politicians and lobbyists could produce better forecasts if they could access classified information, join professional committees, or benefit from personal qualifications. Unfortunately, they are not immune to mistakes. It is also questionable whether they can assert their views, even if they are correct, in political discourse with uninformed peers.

  2. 2.

    A transfer of zero means that the capability is terminated since funds required for its generation are cut off. Hence, a transfer of zero over all capabilities is economically equivalent to the abolition of the armed forces. In economic terms, this extreme point is an admissible solution.

  3. 3.

    To simplify the presentation, all following diagrams refer to the acquisition of material resources. However, they can also inform the analysis of human resource requirements by interpreting q as the quantity of labor required and A as the labor supply curve.

  4. 4.

    There is no guarantee that arms producers will meet this demand at all, as they might also internationally ration their production volume, or auction it to the highest bidder.

  5. 5.

    Until the middle of the nineteenth century, combatants in Europe regularly served in foreign armies. For example, German commanders Clausewitz, Gneisenau, Scharnhorst and Yorck temporarily served in the Russian Armed Forces. Today, however, the idea of the French Revolution that only citizens can join the national armed forces has prevailed. Contemporary exceptions to this rule are, for example, the armed forces of Luxembourg or the French Foreign Legion, which also or exclusively accept foreigners as combatants.

  6. 6.

    Arithmetically speaking, this effect increases the equipment ratio, because fewer combatants now share the same number of systems. However, capability generation still degrades since there is no compensation for the decrease in labor input.

  7. 7.

    Provided that these assets have not yet been fully depreciated, such that a residual value still exists that may generate positive liquidation proceeds.

Bibliography

  • Alchian AA (1950) Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58:211-221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ, Coyne CJ, Leeson PT (2008) Institutional stickiness and the new development economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 67:331-358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ, Coyne CJ, Leeson PT (2007) Saving government failure theory from itself: Recasting political economy from an Austrian perspective. Constitutional Political Economy 18:127-143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1990) The domain of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy 1:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman RA (1991) Interorganisational ecology of strategy making and organisational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organisation Science 2:239-262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz C (1989) On war. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey T, Montgomery JA (2002) The emergence of mini UAVs for military applications. National Defense University, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense News (2016) New warship’s big guns have no bullets. Defense News, November 7, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense News (2020) Indonesia says it wants to buy Austria’s entire Typhoon fleet. Defense News, July 20, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowski PJ, Gholz E (2006) Buying military transformation: Technological innovation and the defense industry. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria AJ (2016) Rediscovering US military strategy: A role for doctrine. Journal of Strategic Studies 39:231-245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21:1105-1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald AE (1989) The Pentagonists: An insider’s view of waste, mismanagement, and fraud in defense spending. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune A, Mitchell W (2012) Unpacking firm exit at the firm and industry levels: The adaptation and selection of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 33:794-819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office (2019) Report GAO-19-570 (Future warfare). Office of Public Affairs, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office (2017) Report GAO-17-317 (High risk series). Office of Public Affairs, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P, Wright G (2010) The limits of forecasting methods in anticipating rare events. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 77:355-368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal Summer Special Issue 17:109-122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Clements B, Bhattacharya R, Chakravarti S (2002) The elusive peace dividend. Finance and Development 39:49-51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan M, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organisational change. American Sociological Review 49:149-164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley K (1995) Industrial policies in the defense sector. In Hartley K, Sandler T (Eds) (1995) Handbook of defense economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam et al., 459-489

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley K (2007) The arms industry, procurement and industrial policies. In Sandler T, Hartley K (Eds) Handbook of defense economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam et al., 1139-1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat C, Peteraf M (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, October Special Issue 24:997-1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat CE (1997) Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation. Strategic Management Journal 18:339-360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RM, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence: Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 63-84

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobse L (2019) Austro-Daimler Panzerautomobil. Online from www.tanks-encyclopedia.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YW, Brown T (2012) The importance of contract design. Public Administration Review 72:687-696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer KR (1992) Elections, business cycles, and the timing of defense contract awards in the United States. In Mintz A (Ed) (1992) The political economy of military spending in the United States. Routledge, New York, 15-32

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill WH (2013) The pursuit of power: Technology, armed force, and society since AD 1000. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton JL (1971) Defence planning: The uncertainty factor. Long Range Planning 3:50-53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery D (2012) Defense-related R&D as a model for ‘grand challenges’ technology policies. Research Policy 41: 1703-1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SC (2010) An armed forces transformed: The U.S. Armed forces’s post-Vietnam recovery and the dynamics of change in military organisations. U.S Armed forces War College, Carlisle

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen N (1994) How many men do armed forces need? An international comparison. Defence and Peace Economics 5:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pejovich S (2003) Understanding the transaction costs of transition: It’s the culture, stupid. Review of Austrian Economics 16:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percia David D, Keupp MM, Marino R, Hofstetter P (2019) The persistent deficit of militia officers in the Swiss Armed Forces: An opportunity cost explanation. Defence and Peace Economics 30: 111-127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickover CA (1998) Time: A traveler's guide. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano GP (1994) Knowledge, co-integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15:85-100

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt JR, James JE, Flanagan EM (1999) Future employment of UAVS: Issues of jointness. National Defence University, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenn, K., Colombi, J., Wu, T., Oyama, K., Johnson, A. 2015. Toward agent-based modeling of the U.S. Department of Defense acquisition system. Procedia Computer Science 44: 383-392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIPRI (2017) Military expenditure by country as a percentage of gross domestic product, 1949-2016. Electronic data from www.sipri.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnoff JP, Hicks MJ (2008) The impact of economic factors and acquisition reforms on the cost of defense weapon systems. Review of Financial Economics 17:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon B, Chouinard P, Kerzner L (2008) The Department of National Defence strategic cost model, volume II – theory and empirics. Defence R&D Canada-CORA, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulberg AN (2007) Managing the unmanned revolution in the US Air Force. Orbis 51:251-265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18:509-533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21:1147–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian H (2014) Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach. W.W. Norton & Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaubel R (1999) Enforcing competition among governments: Theory and application to the European Union. Constitutional Political Economy 10:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R (1989) To promote the general welfare. Pacific Research Institute, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keupp, M.M. (2021). Effectiveness of Military Performance. In: Defense Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73815-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics