Skip to main content

The Management of Death in North America: From the Necropolitical Governmentalization of the State to the Rule of Law Necropower

Abstract

The section develops the notions of the rule of law necropower and necropolitical governmentalization of the state as the specific forms of necropower in North America. Drawing from Achille Mbembe’s and Michel Foucault’s governmentality, the researcher claims that in third world countries like Mexico, state power intertwines with criminal organizations. Criminal-state merging results in institutions and policy for the administration of death, which in turn leads to the reproduction of illegal capital accumulation—the necropolitical governmentalization of the state. Also, building on competing interpretations of necropower in the first world, the author argues that the United States and Canada enforce their sovereign power of killing not above or below the law but through it. North American first world countries use legal frameworks to accumulate capital through activities that produce death in specific geographies and spaces along the lines of nationality, ethnicity, race, class, and gender. The chapter calls this rule of law necropower. The common ground in both types of necropower is lucrative death.

Keywords

  • The rule of law
  • Governmentalization of the state
  • Biopower
  • Capital accumulation
  • Disposability

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73659-0_2
  • Chapter length: 25 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-73659-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    The author is aware that the use of the first world-third world binary could be problematic or outdated. However, it is widely used in decolonial and necropolitical approaches as a semantic reaffirmation of the asymmetrical power relations between Western democracies and the rest of the world.

  2. 2.

    The incommensurability of neoliberal capitalism and its ethos of death are developed in ideas such as: zombie capitalism (Harman 2009), which based on Marx’s original concepts focuses on the destructive capacity of capital and its power to put us against us themselves; gangster capitalism (Woodiwiss 2005), which describes how organized crime in the United States has been successful thanks to the support of transnational politicians, bureaucrats and executives; ghost capitalism (Roy 2014), which examines how the demands of global capital have subjected millions of people in India to brutal forms of environmental predation, exploitation and racism; narconomics (Wainwright 2016), which analyzes the productive, distribution and sale chains of drug trafficking from an economic perspective, including internet sales, diversification of illicit merchandise, social responsibility and mergers between cartels; and narco-war capitalism, which suggests that internal conflicts and militarization focus on critical geographies for energy projects and resource extraction (Paley 2014; Harman 2009; Woodiwiss 2005; Wainwright 2016; Roy 2014; Paley 2014).

  3. 3.

    By August 2020, critical media revealed that both Murdoch and Mercer were assessing the possibility that Trump lost the presidential set for November, but their support for Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign is a fact.

  4. 4.

    Power produces subjectivity through discourses and apparatuses, and depending whether life or death is at stake, power objectifies human beings in different ways. The subjectivity produced by the necropolitical apparatus of production and administration of forced migration is a subjected subject: the forced migrant. According to Foucault, there are three modalities of objectification of power through which human beings become subjects: the forms of research that we call sciences; the dividing practices by which the subject is separated within his own body or divided from others, and the techniques through which human beings are willing to become themselves subjects. In biopolitics and necropolitics, subjects are usually a mixture of the three. Biopolitics’ predominant subjectivity is Homo economicus, although jurist Giorgio Agamben argued for a legal version of the neoliberal subject: the homo sacer. Firstly, the homo economicus are entrepreneurs of themselves, and they themselves are their own capital, producer, source of profit and generator of their own satisfaction. The new homo economicus is both consumer and producer. The homo sacer is a political-legal figure from the Ancient world that refers to a person who has been accused and convicted of a crime and while they cannot be sacrificed, anyone who kills them will not be accused of homicide. These individuals are left completely unprotected by the law and their inclusion is solely a result of their exclusion. The bare life of homo sacer is subject to the political only by exception. For Agamben, homo sacer is the person who can be killed but not sacrificed (Agamben 1998, 2001, 2004; Foucault 2004) .

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer. El poder soberano y la nuda vida. España: Pre-textos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2001. Medios sin fin. España: Pre-textos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. El estado de excepción: Archipiélago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Bobby. 2008. “Necrocapitalism.” Organization Studies, 29 (12):1541–1563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Bobby. 2008a. “Necrocapitalism.” Organization Studies, 1541–1563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Bobby. 2008b. “Necrocapitalism.” Organization Studies, 29 (12):1541–1563.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, Tom. 2011. The Rule of Law: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Gordon L. 1985. Judges and the cities: interpreting local autonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, David. 2010. The spatial, the legal and the pragmatics of world-making: nomospheric investigations. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Mahecha, Ovidio. 2003. Debates sobre el espacio en la geografía contemporánea. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge Massachusetts Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estévez, Ariadna. 2018. “Biopolítica y necropolítica: ¿constitutivos u opuestos?“ Espiral, Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad 25 (73):9–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez, Ariadna. 2020. “Mexican Necropolitical Governmentality and the Management of Suffering Through Human Rights Technologies.” Critical Criminology 28:27–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, Frantz. 2012. Los condenados de la tierra Mexico: FCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores Pérez, Carlos Antonio. 2013. Historias de polvo y sangre: génesis y evolución del tráfico de drogas en el estado de Tamaulipas. México: CIESAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1982. “Technologies of the self. Lectures at University of Vermoint in October 1982.” Foucault.info, accessed July 6. https://foucault.info/documents/foucault.technologiesOfSelf.en/.

  • Foucault, Michel. 1997a. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Edited by Paul Rabinow. Vol. I, The Essential Works of Michel Foucault: 1954–1984. New York: The New Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1997b. Power. Vol. III, Essential Works of Foucault. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2000. Power. Edited by Paul Rabinow. Vol. III, Essential Works of Foucault (1954–1984). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2004. The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Picador-Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2006. Defender la sociedad. México: Fonbdo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, territory, population: lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Basingstoke England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2013. “Right of death and Power Over Life.” In Biopolitics. A reader, 41–60. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, Henry. 2014. Neoliberalism and the Machinery of Disposability. Truth-Out (http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/22958-neoliberalism-and-the-machinery-of-disposability).

  • Giroux, Henry A. 2009. Zombie Politics and Culture in the Age of Casino Capitalismo. Edited by Tobby Miller. NYC: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gržinić, Marina, and Šefik Tatlić. 2014. Necropolitics, Racialization, and Global Capitalism. Historicization of Biopolitics and Forensics of Politics, Art, and Life. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Chris. 2009. Zombie capitalism: global crisis and the relevance of Marx. London: Bookmarks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2006. Spaces of global capitalism. London; New York, NY: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Doreen. 2008. “A Global Sense of Place.” In The Cultural Geographer Reader, edited by Timothy Oakes and Patricia L. Price, 260. NYC: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, Achille. 1995. “Figures of the Subject in Times of Crisis.” Public Culture 7:323–352.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, Achille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture 15 (1):11–40.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, Achille. 2011. Necropolítica. España: Melusina (sic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, David. 2017. The Harmful Effects Of Canadian Mining In Latin America And The Caribbean Are Potentially Destabilizing The Region. Medium (July 20, 2017): https://medium.com/the-global-millennial/the-harmful-effects-of-canadian-mining-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-849177afe21f. Accessed August 3, 2020.

  • McKibben, Bill. 2020. When it comes to climate hypocrisy, Canada’s leaders have reached a new low. The Guardian (February 5, 2020): https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/05/when-it-comes-to-climate-hypocrisy-canadas-leaders-have-reached-a-new-low.

  • Montag, Warren 2005. “Necro-economics. Adam Smith and death in the life of the universal.” Radical Philosophy (134).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellys, Ashley. 2016. The color of justice: racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. Washington DC: The Sentencing Project. Research and Advocacy for Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, Katherine. 1989. “Engendering Justice: Women’s Perspectives an the Rule of Law.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 39 (2):127–148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, Clare. 2005. Michel Foucault: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, Dawn. 2014. Drug War Capitalism. Oakland: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repo, Jemima. 2016. “Thanatopolitics or biopolitics? Diagnosing the racial and sexual politics of the European far-right.” Contemporary Political Theory 15 (1):110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, Rubén. 2020. México registró 34,582 asesinatos durante 2019, la cifra más alta en 20 años. Univision Noticias (January 21, 2020). Accessed July 6, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Arundhati. 2014. Capitalism: a ghost story. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, Edward E. 2009. “The City and Spatial Justice.” Justice Spatiale/ Spatial Justice 1 (1):5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, Karina. 2019. Mexico pone en marcha un programa para buscar a 40.000 desaparecidos. El País (Febrero 4, 2019): https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/02/04/mexico/1549301318_972191.html. Accessed May 1, 2019.

  • The Center for Media and Democracy. 2020. “Alec Exposed. Guns, Prisons, Crime, and Immigration.” https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Guns,_Prisons,_Crime,_and_Immigration, accessed August 12, 2020.

  • Treviño Rangel, Javier. 2020. “Mercancías desechables: políticas de muerte y migración internacional en México.” In Necropolítica y migración en la frontera vertical mexicana. Un ejercicio de conocimiento situado, edited by Ariadna Estévez and Elisa Ortega Velázquez, 105–142. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet, Mark. 2016. “Critical Legal Studies and the Rule of Law.” In Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law edited by Marti Loughlin and Jens Meierhenrich. Cambridge Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, Sayak. 2010. Capitalismo Gore. España: Melusina

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde Gefaell, Clara. 2016. De la necropolítica Neoliberal, A la Empatía Radical. Violencia Discreta, Cuerpos Excluidos y Repolitización. Madrid: Icaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, Tom. 2016. Narconomics: how to run a drug cartel. First edition. ed. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jackie. 2018. Carceral Capitalism, Intervention. Pasadena, California: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waslin, Michele. 2020. “The Use of Executive Orders and Proclamations to Create Immigration Policy: Trump in Historical Perspective.” Journal on Migration and Human Security 8 (1):54–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss, Michael. 2005. Gangster capitalism: the United States and the global rise of organized crime. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on Mining and Human Rights in Latin America. 2015. The impact of Canadian Mining in Latin America and Canada’s Responsibility Executive Summary of the Report submitted to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariadna Estévez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Estévez, A. (2021). The Management of Death in North America: From the Necropolitical Governmentalization of the State to the Rule of Law Necropower. In: Estévez, A. (eds) Necropower in North America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73659-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73659-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73658-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73659-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)