Skip to main content

Risk-Driven Decision Making Within the Observational Method: Case Study Based on the New International Airport of Mexico City

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
18th International Probabilistic Workshop (IPW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 153))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 739 Accesses

Abstract

In geotechnical design, the Observational Method poses as an attractive solution for reducing construction costs without compromising safety, especially when dealing with a high level of uncertainty. Additionally, the benefits of the Observational Method can be elevated when it is applied in a probabilistic concept. Designing the soil improvement of the runways for the New International Airport of Mexico City (Nuevo Aeropuerto Internacional de la Ciudad de México—NAICM) holds significant risk due to the extremely soft soil, the soil-related uncertainties and the strict pavement operation requirements. Instead of opting for an over-conservative and costly design, the Observational Method was adopted in order to steer the soil improvement works according to monitored soil behaviour. The analysis presented in this paper, which is based on an example inspired by the NAICM, employs a probabilistic framework, composed of several probabilistic tools, in order to estimate the reliability of the design. Specifically, incoming monitoring (soil response) data is utilized in several reliability updating steps, giving insight into the probability of the design meeting the operational requirements. Moreover, assessing the reliability of a design allows for the quantification of risk, which can pose as a strong motivator during the decision-making process. Design decisions, such as application of mitigation measures, can be made according to the direction of risk minimization. Finally, the entire procedure of the Observational Method and the steering of the design throughout the soil improvement phase are illustrated in a decision tree. This paper draws conclusions on the benefits of incorporating probabilistic concepts in large scale projects with strong uncertainties, as well as utilizing risk as motivation for decision making, which eventually proves to be valuable for project management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ICAO. (2013). Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Vol. I—Aerodrome.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peck, R. B. (1969). Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Geotechnique, 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Staveren, Uncertainty and ground conditions., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Den Eijnden, A. P., & Hicks, M. A. (2017). Efficient subset simulation for evaluating the modes of improbable slope failure. Computers and Geotechnics, 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vanmarcke, E. (2010). Random fields: Analysis and synthesis. World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soubra, A. H., & Bastidas-Arteaga, E. (2014). Advanced reliability analysis methods. In ALERT Doctoral School 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mavritsakis, A. (2017). Evaluation of Inverse Analysis Methods with Numerical Simulation of Slope Excavation.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forrester, A., Sobester, A., & Keane, A. (2008). Engineering design via surrogate modelling, a practical guide. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deltares, D-Settlement version 16.1 [computer software]. Available at: https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/d-settlement-2/, Delft.

  10. Ballio, F., & Guadagnini, A. (2004). Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology. Water Resources Research, 40(4).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mavritsakis, A., de Kant, M., van der Schrier, J. (2021). Risk-Driven Decision Making Within the Observational Method: Case Study Based on the New International Airport of Mexico City. In: Matos, J.C., et al. 18th International Probabilistic Workshop. IPW 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73615-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73616-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics