Abstract
In geotechnical design, the Observational Method poses as an attractive solution for reducing construction costs without compromising safety, especially when dealing with a high level of uncertainty. Additionally, the benefits of the Observational Method can be elevated when it is applied in a probabilistic concept. Designing the soil improvement of the runways for the New International Airport of Mexico City (Nuevo Aeropuerto Internacional de la Ciudad de México—NAICM) holds significant risk due to the extremely soft soil, the soil-related uncertainties and the strict pavement operation requirements. Instead of opting for an over-conservative and costly design, the Observational Method was adopted in order to steer the soil improvement works according to monitored soil behaviour. The analysis presented in this paper, which is based on an example inspired by the NAICM, employs a probabilistic framework, composed of several probabilistic tools, in order to estimate the reliability of the design. Specifically, incoming monitoring (soil response) data is utilized in several reliability updating steps, giving insight into the probability of the design meeting the operational requirements. Moreover, assessing the reliability of a design allows for the quantification of risk, which can pose as a strong motivator during the decision-making process. Design decisions, such as application of mitigation measures, can be made according to the direction of risk minimization. Finally, the entire procedure of the Observational Method and the steering of the design throughout the soil improvement phase are illustrated in a decision tree. This paper draws conclusions on the benefits of incorporating probabilistic concepts in large scale projects with strong uncertainties, as well as utilizing risk as motivation for decision making, which eventually proves to be valuable for project management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ICAO. (2013). Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Vol. I—Aerodrome.
Peck, R. B. (1969). Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Geotechnique, 171–187.
M. Staveren, Uncertainty and ground conditions., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.
Van Den Eijnden, A. P., & Hicks, M. A. (2017). Efficient subset simulation for evaluating the modes of improbable slope failure. Computers and Geotechnics, 267–280.
Vanmarcke, E. (2010). Random fields: Analysis and synthesis. World Scientific.
Soubra, A. H., & Bastidas-Arteaga, E. (2014). Advanced reliability analysis methods. In ALERT Doctoral School 2014.
Mavritsakis, A. (2017). Evaluation of Inverse Analysis Methods with Numerical Simulation of Slope Excavation.
Forrester, A., Sobester, A., & Keane, A. (2008). Engineering design via surrogate modelling, a practical guide. Wiley, New York.
Deltares, D-Settlement version 16.1 [computer software]. Available at: https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/d-settlement-2/, Delft.
Ballio, F., & Guadagnini, A. (2004). Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology. Water Resources Research, 40(4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mavritsakis, A., de Kant, M., van der Schrier, J. (2021). Risk-Driven Decision Making Within the Observational Method: Case Study Based on the New International Airport of Mexico City. In: Matos, J.C., et al. 18th International Probabilistic Workshop. IPW 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73615-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73616-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)