Skip to main content

Dynamic Response Equivalence of a Scaled Bridge Model Due to Vehicular Movement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
18th International Probabilistic Workshop (IPW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 153))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The design of scaled testing is important for establishing equivalence with a full-scale structure but if difficult since the geometry and the material both need to be scaled. For a good, scaled testing, it is important to demonstrate the results of the scaled original structure and the designed scaled testing behave similarly, so that there is control over experimentation. Despite existing guidance around this topic, such equivalence is sometimes not checked appropriately, leading to uncertainties and variations in scaled testing which significantly compromises the usefulness of such experiments. This paper addresses this topic for a bridge-vehicle interaction problem and demonstrates how a scaled testing can show equivalence with respect to its full-scale counterpart. A Buckingham-Pi approach has been taken for scaling and the assumptions around the models and the responses are defined to establish the boundaries of the responses that are intended to be replicated. The non-dimensional parameters are defined and guide the design of future experiments. The conversion of a complex cross-sectional profile to an equivalent beam with made of a different material is dictated by the matching of modelled responses of the scaled responses of the original structure versus the unscaled responses of the experimental structure. The match indicates that establishment of such equivalence is particularly relevant for carrying out future experiments within the laboratory and subsequently linking it to full-scale structures for implementing sensors or carrying our intervention aspects such as repairs. The work also emphasizes on how a well-designed scaled testing should have a numerical benchmark for future interpretation and understanding assumptions around such interpretations when comparing full-scale experiments with controlled laboratory-based experiments, reducing uncertainty around such comparisons. The presented work is expected to be of interest for both researchers and practicing engineers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang, P. C., Flatau, A., & Liu, S. C. (2003). Review paper: Health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Structural Health Monitoring, 2(3), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brownjohn, J. M. W. (2007). Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Philosophical Transactions Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 589–622.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cahill, P., Hazra, B., Karoumi, R., Mathewson, A., & Pakrashi, V. (2018). Vibration energy harvesting based monitoring of an operational bridge undergoing forced vibration and train passage. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 106, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgerald, F., Malekjafarian, A., Bhowmik, B., Prendergast, L., Cahill, P., Kim, C. W., Hazra, B., Pakrashi, V., & OBrien, E. (2019). Scour damage detection and structural health monitoring of a laboratory-scaled bridge using a vibration energy harvesting device. Sensors, 19(11), 2572.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frýba, L., & Pirner, M. (2001). Load tests and modal analysis of bridges. Engineering Structures, 23(1), 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karoumi, R., Wiberg, J., & Liljencrantz, A. (2005). Monitoring traffic loads and dynamic effects using an instrumented railway bridge. Engineering Structures, 27(12), 1813–1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, H. G., & Sabnis, G. M. (1999). Structural modeling and experimental techniques (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Law, S., Chan, T., & Zeng, Q. (1997). Moving force identification: A time domain method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 201(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bilello, C., Bergman, L. a. & Kuchma, D. (2004). Experimental investigation of a small-scale bridge model under a moving mass. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(5), 799–804.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muir Wood, D., Lombardi, D., & Bhattacharya, S. (2011). Similitude relationships for physical modelling of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 11(2), 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaksic, V., O’Shea, R., Cahill, P., Murphy, J., Mandic, D. P., & Pakrashi, V. (2015). Dynamic response signatures of a scaled model platform for floating wind turbines in an ocean wave basin. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373(2035), 20140078:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pakrashi, V., O’ Connor, A., & Basu, B. (2010). A bridge—Vehicle interaction based experimental investigation of damage evolution. Structural Health Monitoring, 9(4), 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buckingham, E. (1914). On physically similar systems; Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Physical Review, 4(4), 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhowmik, B., Tripura, T., Hazra, B., & Pakrashi, V. (2019). First order eigen perturbation techniques for real time damage detection of vibrating systems: Theory and applications. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 71(6), 060801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mucchielli, P., Bhowmik, B., Hazra, B., & Pakrashi, V. (2020). Higher-order stabilised perturbation for recursive eigen-decomposition estimation. ASME Journal of Vibrations and Acoustics, 142(6), 061010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the EU-funded SIRMA (Strengthening Infrastructure Risk Management in the Atlantic Area) project (Grant No. EAPA\_826/2018). Vikram Pakrashi would also like to acknowledge the support of SFI MaREI centre under Grant number RC2302_2. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram Pakrashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cahill, P., Pakrashi, V. (2021). Dynamic Response Equivalence of a Scaled Bridge Model Due to Vehicular Movement. In: Matos, J.C., et al. 18th International Probabilistic Workshop. IPW 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73615-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73616-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics