Skip to main content

Development of Culvert Risk Condition Evaluation for Decision-Making Within Road Infrastructure Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
18th International Probabilistic Workshop (IPW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 153))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 795 Accesses

Abstract

Regarding road infrastructure management systems, culverts need to be assessed in order to avoid failures and road collapses. So, periodic inspections framework and condition rating implementation has an important role for life service estimation and reliability evaluation. In addition, the risk can be avoided through condition rating merged with culverts exposure and vulnerabilities. This will provide information to support decision-making and prioritize interventions. In this paper a new approach for decision-making process is presented taking into consideration the global risk index (αG). The proposal includes a set of culverts descriptors, weight attribution and aggregation rules complying with external factors such as hazards, condition rates and consequences. Moreover, a case study with 25 different systems is conducted to qualitatively assess culverts global risk index and prioritize needed interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ryumin, M. G., & Shepitko, E. S. (2017). Forecast for terms of culvert inspection and repair. Procedia Engineering, 189(May), 598–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Najafi, M., & Bhattachar, D. V. (2011). Development of a culvert inventory and inspection framework for asset management of road structures. J. King Saud University—Science, 23(3), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meegoda, J. N., Juliano, T. M., Potts, L., Tang, C., & Marhaba, T. (2017). Implementation of a drainage information, analysis and management system. Journal Traffic Transportation Engineering (English Ed.), 4 (2), 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Misnevs, B., Melikyan, A., & Bazaras, D. (2015). Hazard assessment of weather factors for the occurrence of an emergency on the railway. Procedia Computer Science, 77, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sohler, F. A. S., & Caldeira, L. M. (2016). Safety of dams: A pathological approach of qualitative and quantitative risks. Journal of Civil Engineering and Arquitecture, 10, 1032–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casas, J. A., Hajdin, N. T. R., Kusar, M., Masovic, S., & Linneberg, P. (2018). TU1406—quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level—WG3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masr, A., Ojrnsson, I., Ivanov, O. S. (2019). A qualitative prioritizations of the risks imposed on bridges due to climate changes. IABSE Symposium “Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management—Report” (pp. 80–87).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foucher, L., & Blés, T. (2019). Résilience des ouvrages de gestion des eaux au changement climatique - Méthodologie d’évaluation WATCH. RGRA, 961, 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hunt, J. H., Zerges, S. M., et al. (2010). Culvert assessment and decision-making procedures manual for federal lands highway. FHWA-CFL/TD-10-005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Statton, J., et al. (2010). Culvert risk assessment guideline. RTA, V3.02.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lian, Y., & Yen, B. C. (2003). Comparison of risk calculation methods for a culvert. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 129(2), 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santiago, S. S. (2019). Brisa experience—Risk assessment and capital investment planning at Brisa. In IABSE Symposium “Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management—Report (pp. 317–326).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lajevardi, S., Matos, J., & Lourenço, P. B. (2019). Quality control index survey for railway bridge health monitoring. In: IABSE Symposium Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management—Report (pp. 317–326).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Najafi, M., et al. (2008). An asset management approach for drainage infrastructures and culverts. CDFA 20.701.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sousa, F., Dias, S., Matos, J.C., Camões, A. (2021). Development of Culvert Risk Condition Evaluation for Decision-Making Within Road Infrastructure Management. In: Matos, J.C., et al. 18th International Probabilistic Workshop. IPW 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73615-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73616-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics