Skip to main content

Sustainable Development in the Anthropocene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education
  • 3749 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the evolving role of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) within the context of the Anthropocene and its historical roots. The story of the SDGs agenda is a story about development. At the heart of ‘sustainable development’ is the legacy of unsustainable development with its roots in modernity and colonialism. Critical engagement with the SDGs involves recognising these roots are shared by universities and the reciprocal need for maintenance, repair and regeneration. The potential for the SDG agenda to function in practice as a turning point is far from certain. Shaping its actual outcomes are legacies from the past, competing worldviews and different readings of the sustainable development challenge. The SDGs represent the goal posts we jointly need to orient towards and ways of working differently in the Anthropocene. These goal posts are wide and diverse but represent a significant shift for both universities and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    UNDP (undated) Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/brochure/SDGs_Booklet_Web_En.pdf

  2. 2.

    UN (2015) Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf

  3. 3.

    Freistein, K., Mahlert, B. (2016) The potential for tackling inequality in the Sustainable Development Goals. Third world Quarterly 37, 2139–2155.

  4. 4.

    Sachs et al. (2020) Sustainable Development Report, SDSN https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2020/2020_sustainable_development_report.pdf

  5. 5.

    UN (2020) Emission Gap Report 2020 accessed on https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020

  6. 6.

    Op cit.

  7. 7.

    Pyne, S. (2020) From Pleistocene to Pyrocene: fire replaces ice. Earth’s Future 8, e2020EF001722.

  8. 8.

    NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, State of the Climate: Global Climate Report for Annual 2019, published online January 2020, accessed February 12, 2021 from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201913

  9. 9.

    NASA (2020) Global Climate Change—Vital Signs of the Planet. Global Temperature. Latest Average Annual Anomaly. https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ Accessed February 10, 2021.

  10. 10.

    UNEP (2019) Emissions Gap Report 2019.

  11. 11.

    IPCC (2018) Summary for Policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, T. Waterfield (eds.)]. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp.

  12. 12.

    Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Abdrabo, M.-K., Adger, N., Anokhin, Y.A., Anisimov, O.A., Arent, D.J., Barnett, J., (2014) Summary for policymakers, Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.

  13. 13.

    IPBES Global Assessment Report (2019) Summary for Policy Makers, p. 10–15.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., p. 10.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., p. 10, 15.

  16. 16.

    Sachs et al. (2020) p. 25.

  17. 17.

    Gabay, C., Ilcan, S. (2017) Leaving No-one Behind? The Politics of Destination in the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Globalizations 14, 337–342.

  18. 18.

    Fankhauser, S. and Schmidt-Traub, G. (2011) From adaptation to climate-resilient development: the costs of climate-proofing the Millennium Development Goals in Africa. Climate and Development 3, 94–113.

  19. 19.

    Koponen, J. (2020) Development: History and Power of the Concept. Forum for Development Studies 47, 1–21. P. 5.

  20. 20.

    Massey, D. (1999) Spaces of politics. In: D. Massey, J. Allen and P. Sarre (eds) Human Geography Today. Polity Press, Cambridge. Pp. 279–94.

  21. 21.

    Koponen, J. (2020) Development: History and Power of the Concept. Forum for Development Studies 47, 1–21. P. 5.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., p. 7.

  23. 23.

    Cowen, M.P., Shenton, R. (2003) Doctrines of Development. Routledge, London. Hart, G. (2010) D/developments after the Meltdown. Antipode 41, 117–141.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., p. 9.

  25. 25.

    Murray Li, T. (2007) The will to Improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press, Durham.

  26. 26.

    Koponen, J. (2020) Development: History and Power of the Concept. Forum for Development Studies 47, 1–21. p. 14.

  27. 27.

    Abrokwaa, C., (2017) Colonialism and the development of higher education, Re-thinking Postcolonial Education in Sub-Saharan Africa in the 21st Century. Brill Sense, p. 201–220. P. 206.

  28. 28.

    See for example Gascoigne, J., Tranter, N. (1998) Science in the service of empire: Joseph Banks, the British state and the uses of science in the age of revolution. Cambridge University Press. Dubow, S. (2006) A Commonwealth of Knowledge: Science, Sensibility, and White South Africa 1820–2000. Oxford University Press on Demand.

  29. 29.

    Harrison, M. (2005) Science and the British empire. Isis 96, 56–63.

  30. 30.

    See for example Wallerstein, I. (1984) The Development of the Concept of Development. Sociological Theory 2, 102–116. Gilmartin, D. (1994) Scientific Empire and Imperial Science: Colonialism and Irrigation Technology in the Indus Basin. The Journal of Asian Studies 53, 1127–1149.

  31. 31.

    Op cit.

  32. 32.

    Koponen, p. 16.

  33. 33.

    Op cit.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., p. 3.

  35. 35.

    See for example Murray Li, T. (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press, Durham. Barber, M., Bowie, C. (2008) How international NGOs could do less harm and more good. Development in Practice 18, 748–754. Neef, A., Singer, J. (2015) Development-induced displacement in Asia: conflicts, risks, and resilience. Development in Practice 25, 601–611.

  36. 36.

    Cowen and Shenton 2003.

  37. 37.

    Belda-Miquel, S., Boni, A., Calabuig, C. (2019) SDG Localisation and Decentralised Development Aid: Exploring Opposing Discourses and Practices in Valencia’s Aid Sector. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 20, 386–402. P. 386.

  38. 38.

    Ibid.

  39. 39.

    M. Douglas (1999) Four cultures: The evolution of a parsimonious model. Geojournal 47, 411–415. Douglas, M., Wildavsky, A. (1983) Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Univ of California Press. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural theory. Westview Press.

  40. 40.

    See for example Harvey, D (2006) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

  41. 41.

    Fine, B. (1999) The developmental state is dead—long live social capital? Development and Change 30, 1–19.

  42. 42.

    Overton, J., Murray, W.E. (2020) Aid and Development. Routledge. Weyland K., 1996: Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31, 3–31.

  43. 43.

    Inter-Agency Task Force on Financing for Development (2016) Official Development Assistance. Issues Brief. https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ODA_OECD-FfDO_IATF-Issue-Brief.pdf

  44. 44.

    Murray, W.E., Overton, J.D. (2011) Neoliberalism is dead, long live neoliberalism? Neostructuralism and the international aid regime of the 2000s. Progress in development studies 11, 307–319.

  45. 45.

    Murray, W.E., Overton, J.D. (2011) Neoliberalism is dead, long live neoliberalism? Neostructuralism and the international aid regime of the 2000s. Progress in development studies 11, 307–319.

  46. 46.

    Mawdsley, E., Murray, W.E., Overton, J., Scheyvens, R., Banks, G. (2018) Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity”: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era. Development Policy Review 36, O25–O43.

  47. 47.

    https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/jul/16/alarming-shortfall-foreign-aid-worlds-biggest-crises

  48. 48.

    Overton, J and Murray, W (2020) Aid and Development, London, Routledge.

  49. 49.

    Fine, B (1999) The development state is dead—long live social capital? Development and Change, 30(1), p. 1–19.

  50. 50.

    Järvelä, J., Solitander, N., (2019) The financialization and responsibilization of development aid, in: Lund-Thomsen, P., Wendelboe Hanson, M., Lindgreen, A. (Eds.), Business and Development Studies: Issues and Perspectives. London, New York, p. 100–122.

  51. 51.

    https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/be6d1d56/files/uploaded/151112-SDG-Financing-Needs-Summary-for-Policymakers.pdf

  52. 52.

    Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., Hughes, E. (2016) The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond ‘Business as Usual’. Sustainable Development 24, p. 371–382.

  53. 53.

    Sachs, W., ed. (1992) The Development Dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power, London: Zed Books.

  54. 54.

    Esteva, G. (1992) “Development.” In The Development Dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power, edited by Wolfgang Sachs, London: Zed Books. Pp. 6–25.

  55. 55.

    Gudynas, E. (2011) Buen Vivir: today’s tomorrow. Development 54, 441–447. P. 442.

  56. 56.

    Ziai, A. (2017) Post-development 25 years after The Development Dictionary. Third world quarterly 38, 2547–2558.

  57. 57.

    Ibid. 2017, p. 2547–48.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., p. 2547.

  59. 59.

    Weber, H. (2017). “Politics of ‘Leaving No One Behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Agenda.” Globalizations 14(3), p. 399–414.

  60. 60.

    Bendix, D. (2017). “Reflecting the Post-Development gaze: the degrowth debate in Germany.” Third world quarterly 38(12), p. 2617–2633. Acosta, A. (2017). “Living Well: ideas for reinventing the future.” Third world quarterly 38(12), p. 2600–2616.

  61. 61.

    For example see Matthews, S. (2017). “Colonised minds? Post-development theory and the desirability of development in Africa.” 38(12), p. 2650–2663.

  62. 62.

    Sachs, W. (2017). “The Sustainable Development Goals and Laudato si’: varieties of Post-Development?” Third world quarterly, 38(12), p. 2573–2587.

  63. 63.

    Brundtland, G. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427.

  64. 64.

    Dryzek, J.S. (2012) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. P. 150.

  65. 65.

    Thompson, P. B. (2010). The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics. Lexington, The University Press of Kentucky.

  66. 66.

    Dryzek (2012), p. 160.

  67. 67.

    Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T.M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C.P., Barnosky, A.D., Cornell, S.E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J.F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S.J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., Schellnhuber, H.J. (2018) Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

  68. 68.

    Dryzek (2012). See also Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens, W.W. (1972) The Limits to Growth; a Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe, New York.

  69. 69.

    Solow, R.M. (1992) An Almost Practical Step Toward Sustainability; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, USA.

  70. 70.

    Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management, University of Chicago Press.

  71. 71.

    Ibid.

  72. 72.

    Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: places to intervene in a system. http://www.sustainer.org/pubs/Leverage_Points.pdf The Sustainability Institute. On the increasing flammability of the planet due to climate change, see Pyne (2020) above.

  73. 73.

    Turner, G. (2014) Is global collapse imminent? An updated comparison of the Limits to Growth with historical data. Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute Research paper no. 4, University of Melbourne. Pp. 21. https://sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/publications/research-papers/is-global-collapse-imminent. Accessed February 5, 2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Steele .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steele, W., Rickards, L. (2021). Sustainable Development in the Anthropocene. In: The Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73575-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73575-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73574-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73575-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics