Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Yearbook of International Economic Law ((EYIELMONO,volume 17))

  • 170 Accesses

Abstract

Transit is understood as the movement of goods and persons and freedom of transit is the unrestricted movement of goods and persons. Freedom of transit finds its legal roots in the natural law and the Roman principle of ‘servitude’. Advocates of natural law see freedom of transit in light of free access to the sea and believe that access to the high seas is a natural right of all nations and therefore landlocked States should enjoy the freedom of transit in order benefit from it, as free access to the sea can only be established where freedom of transit exists. Similarly, the ancient Roman legal principle of ‘servitude’ provides that the owner of property could enjoy all kinds of rights and actions on the land unless their exercise harmed the fundamental rights of the neighbor’s land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Melgar (Ch.1, note 2), p. 300, 325.

  2. 2.

    Grotius (1916), pp. 9–10; see also Pounds (1959), pp. 257–59.

  3. 3.

    Livesey Burdic (2007), pp. 360–364; see also Parisi (Ch.1, note 6); Yianopoulois (1983), p. 520.

  4. 4.

    See for example Lesaffer (2005), Castellino and Allen (2003), Lauterpacht (1927), Zhou (2003), pp. 126–179.

  5. 5.

    See generally Barcelona Statute.

  6. 6.

    See generally (Ch.1, note 13).

  7. 7.

    For a detailed list of all international conventions, treaties and agreements governing transit of landlocked countries see Glassner (2001); see also UNCLOS, Question of Free Access to the Sea of Land-Locked Countries, A/CONF.13/29 & Add. 1 (Geneva, 1957).

  8. 8.

    Art. 2 Barcelona Statute.

  9. 9.

    WTO, Glossary of Terms.

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Art. 14 Barcelona Statute.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., Art. 8.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., Art. 7.

  14. 14.

    Makil (1970), p. 40; see also Uprety (1994), p. 432.

  15. 15.

    UNCTE, Final Act and Related Documents, UN Doc. E/CONF.2/78, U.N. Sales No. II.D.4 (1948); see also UNCTE, Interpretive Note, Annex P to the U. N. Charter, UN Doc. E/CONF.2/78 (1948).

  16. 16.

    For the text of the Havana Charter see UNCTE, Final Act and Related Documents, note (15).

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 111.

  18. 18.

    WTO, Glossary of Terms.

  19. 19.

    See Uprety (1994), pp. 441–42.

  20. 20.

    See generally New York Convention, chp.1 (note 13).

  21. 21.

    See UNCTAD, UN ESCOR, 35th plen. mtg. UN Doc. E/CONF. 46/141, Vol. VI, 3 (1964); for literature review see Uprety (1994), pp. 441–42.

  22. 22.

    See generally New York Convention, chp.1 (note 13).

  23. 23.

    Ibid., princ. VII & Art. X.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    See Uprety (1994), p. 449.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 485–86.

  27. 27.

    See generally TIR Convention.

  28. 28.

    See UNECE, TIR Handbook, UN Doc. ECE/TRANS/TIR/6/REV.11 (2018); for more information see also UNECE Website, http://www.enece.org/trans/conventn/legalinst_43_bcf_tir_1975.html.

  29. 29.

    Art. 5 TIR Convention.

  30. 30.

    Ibid.; see also Ibid., annex 2 & annex 7.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., Art. 6 & annex 9.

  32. 32.

    See UNECE, Explanatory Note to Article 8, paragraph 3, The TIR Convention 1979, 9 REV. 50, http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/tir/handbook/english/newtirhand/TIR-6Rev9EN_Convention.pdf. [hereinafter Explanatory Note to TIR Article 8(3)].

  33. 33.

    Art. 8 TIR Convention.

  34. 34.

    Explanatory Note to TIR Article 8(3), (note 32).

  35. 35.

    Art. 9 TIR Convention.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., Art. 17.

  37. 37.

    Ibid., Art.5.

  38. 38.

    Ibid., annex 9, part I.

  39. 39.

    UNCLOS III 1973-1982, UN. Code. Div. Office of Legal Affairs, http://legal.un.org/diplomaticconferences/lawofthesea-1982/lawofthesea-1982.html.

  40. 40.

    Art. 320 UNCLOS.

  41. 41.

    See UN, United Nations Oceans and Law of the Sea: Chronological List of Ratification of, Accession and Succession to the Convention and Related Agreements, https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm; see also UNOHRLLS, UNCLOS and Landlocked Developing Countries: Practical Implications: Summary Report, 2 (2012).

  42. 42.

    UNTC, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg&clang=_en#4.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    UNGA, 28th Sess., Supple No. 21 & corr.1 & 3, vol. II, annex VI, sect. 5, Draft Articles Relating to Landlocked States, UN Doc. A/AC. 138/93, A/CONF.62/C.2/L.29 at 1 (1973); see also UNCLOS III, 2nd Comm, Revised Draft Articles in keeping with the Declaration of Developing Land-Locked and other Geographically Disadvantaged States, Doc. A/CONF.62/C.2/97 (1974).

  45. 45.

    UNCLOS III, Revised Draft Articles, (note 44), draft Art. III.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., draft Art. II.

  47. 47.

    UNCLOS III, Informal Single Negotiating Text, Official Records 137, 168, UN Doc. A/Conf.62WP.8/Part 11 (1975).

  48. 48.

    Art. 87 UNCLOS.

  49. 49.

    See Melgar (Ch.1, note 2), 171.

  50. 50.

    Art. 18(1) UNCLOS.

  51. 51.

    Arts 124, 125, 126 & 131. The equal treatment to vessels flying the flag of landlocked States put an end to traditional understanding of nationality of vessels through port of registration. Previously, since landlocked States did not have any ports under whose names they could register their vessels, their flag flying over their vessels could not present their nationality to coastal States and, therefore, vessels belonging to landlocked States were not allowed to fly flag from these States. See Donald and Stephen (2016), p. 214.

  52. 52.

    Art. 125(2) UNCLOS.

  53. 53.

    See Herrmann et al. (2015), pp. 48–49.

  54. 54.

    ECOSOC, Preparatory Committee of International Conference on Trade and Development, Committee II, Report of the Technical Sub-Committee, UN Doc. E/PC/T/C. II/54/Rev/1, 7–8 (1946); see also Analytical Index of the GATT, Article XXIX, 996–998, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ai17_e/gatt1994_art29_gatt47.pdf; Uprety (1994), pp. 42–45.

  55. 55.

    See generally UNCTE, Final Act and Related Documents, (note 15. For list of all GATT documents and its preparatory committees see also the WTO webpages, https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/1946_50.htm & https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/1946_50.htm; for literature review see for example Neumann (1970), pp. 63–78.

  56. 56.

    See Analytical Index of the GATT, Article XXIX (note 54).

  57. 57.

    For more information on differences between Article 33 of the Havana Charter and Article V GATT see UNECAFE, Problems of Trade of Landlocked Countries in Asia and the Far East, Report by Secretariat, UN Doc. ECAFE/I & T/Sub.4/2 (1956), paras. 6–16.

  58. 58.

    WTO, Glossary of Terms (note3); see also WTO Secretariat, Speeding up Trade: Benefits and Challenges of Implementing the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement, World Trade Report (2015), 35.

  59. 59.

    See WTO, Ministerial Declaration of 14 November 2001 (Doha Declaration), WT/MIN/(01)/DEC/1, 41 I.L.M. 746 (Nov. 20, 2001); WTO General Council Decision, WT/L/579 (Aug. 1, 2004); WTO, Ministerial Declaration of 7 December 2013 (Bali Declaration), WT/MIN/13/DEC/36 (Dec. 13, 2013); for literature review see Melgar, Ch.1 (note 2), 285; Serra Ayral, TBT and TFA Agreements: Leveraging Linkage to Reduce Trade Costs, WTO, Working Paper ERSD-2016-02 (June 2016), 4; Nora Neofeld, The Long and Widening Road: How WTO Members Finally Reached a Trade Facilitation Agreement, WTO, Working Paper ERSD-2014-06 (April 2014).

  60. 60.

    See WTO Website, https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/spra_e/spra157_e.htm.

  61. 61.

    WTO, General Council Decision on Doha Agenda Work Program, Annex D, WT/L/579 (2004), para. 2.

  62. 62.

    WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation (TFA), Feb. 22, 2017, WT/L/940, section II.

  63. 63.

    WTO, Doha Agenda Work Program (note 61), para. 2.

  64. 64.

    WTO, Ministerial Declaration of 18 December 2005 (Hong Kong Declaration), WT/MIN/05/DEC (Dec. 18, 2005).

  65. 65.

    Negotiating Groupe on Trade Facilitation, WTO Negotiations on Trade Facilitation Compilation of Members’ Textual Proposals, TN/TF/W/43/Rev.19, part F-LDC Provisions (June 30, 2009); for TFA implementation challenges in developing and LDC countries see WTO Secretariat, Speeding up Trade (note 58), 108–132; for literature review see Melgar (Ch.1, note 2), 292–296.

References

  • Castellino J, Allen S (2003) Title to territory in international law: a temporal analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald R, Stephen T (2016) The international law of the sea, 2nd edn. Hart, p 214

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner MI (ed) (2001) Biography on Land-locked States, 5th enlarged & revised edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius H (1916) The freedom of the seas. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann C et al (eds) (2015) Trade policy between law, diplomacy, and scholarship. European yearbook of international economic law. Springer, pp 48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterpacht H (1927) Private law sources and analogies of international law

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesaffer R (2005) Argument from Roman law in current international law: occupation and acquisitive prescription. Eur J Int Law 16:25–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey Burdic W (2007) The principles of roman law and their relation to modern law, 3rd edn. Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, pp 360–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Makil R (1970) Transit rights of land-locked countries: an appraisal of international conventions. J World Trade Law 4:40

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann P (1970) The relationship between GATT and the United Nations. Cornell Int Law J 3:63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounds NJ (1959) A free and secure access to the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 257–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprety K (1994) Landlocked states and access to the sea: an evolutionary study of a contested right. Penn State Int Law Rev 12:432

    Google Scholar 

  • Yianopoulois AN (1983) Predial servitudes. West Publishing Company, St. Paul, p 520

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y (2003) History of international law. Foundation of international law. Source of international law. Law of treaties. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Netherlands, pp 126–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akbari, S. (2021). Freedom of Transit of Landlocked Countries in Light of International Multilateral Agreements. In: The WTO Transit Regime for Landlocked Countries and its Impacts on Members’ Regional Transit Agreements. European Yearbook of International Economic Law(), vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73464-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73464-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73463-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73464-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics