Skip to main content

Biological Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus—III: Massive Allograft and Inlaid Free Vascular Fibula Epiphyseal Transfer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Orthopedic Surgical Oncology For Bone Tumors

Abstract

Reconstruction of bony defects following resection of a sarcoma in the pediatric population can be challenging. When the tumor involves the epiphysis or there is not a safe margin of resection around the physis, the physis must be sacrificed, leading to eventual limb length inequalities. In the lower extremity a rotationplasty and an expandable prosthesis are options for reconstruction for tumors around the knee. In the upper extremity the proximal humerus is the most common location for malignant bone tumors and is responsible for 80% of humeral growth. In order to restore longitudinal growth, a free vascularized epiphyseal transfer (FVET) can be used to reconstruct the proximal humerus; however, this method is complicated by high rates of late fibula fracture. Recently, limb reconstruction with bulk structural allografts combined with free fibula flaps has been shown to reduce the risk of late structural failure of intercalary constructs. The use of a combined FVET and bulk-structural allograft offers a biological reconstructive option for the proximal humerus following en-bloc resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsu RW, Wood MB, Sim FH, Chao EY. Free vascularised fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumour resection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(1):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevenson JD, Doxey R, Abudu A, Parry M, Evans S, Peart F, et al. Vascularized fibular epiphyseal transfer for proximal humeral reconstruction in children with a primary sarcoma of bone. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(4):535–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Romano GF, Capanna R. Vascularized epiphyseal transplant. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38(1):95–101, vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morsy M, Sur YJ, Akdag O, Sabbagh MD, Suchyta MA, El-Gammal TA, et al. Vascularity of the proximal fibula and its implications in vascularized epiphyseal transfer: an anatomical and high-resolution computed tomographic angiography study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):172e–83e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seu MY, Haley A, Cho BH, Carl HM, Bos TJ, Hassanein AH, et al. Proximal femur reconstruction using a vascularized fibular epiphysis within a cadaveric femoral allograft in a child with Ewing sarcoma: a case report. Plast Aesthet Res. 2017;4(11).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li J, Wang Z, Pei GX, Guo Z. Biological reconstruction using massive bone allograft with intramedullary vascularized fibular flap after intercalary resection of humeral malignancy. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104(3):244–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capanna R, Campanacci DA, Belot N, Beltrami G, Manfrini M, Innocenti M, et al. A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38(1):51–60, vi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Stans AA, Shin AY, Bishop AT, Sim FH, et al. What is the outcome of allograft and intramedullary free fibula (Capanna technique) in pediatric and adolescent patients with bone tumors? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(3):660–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakri K, Stans AA, Mardini S, Moran SL. Combined massive allograft and intramedullary vascularized fibula transfer: the capanna technique for lower-limb reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2008;22(3):234–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J, Chen G, Lu Y, Zhu H, Ji C, Wang Z. Factors influencing osseous union following surgical treatment of bone tumors with use of the capanna technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(22):2036–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Misaghi A, Jackson TJ, Stans AA, Shaughnessy WJ, Rose PS, Moran SL, et al. Intercalary allograft reconstruction of the proximal tibia with and without a free fibula flap in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40(9):e833–e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew T. Houdek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Houdek, M.T., Wellings, E.P., Moran, S.L. (2022). Biological Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus—III: Massive Allograft and Inlaid Free Vascular Fibula Epiphyseal Transfer. In: Özger, H., Sim, F.H., Puri, A., Eralp, L. (eds) Orthopedic Surgical Oncology For Bone Tumors . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73327-8_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73327-8_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73326-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73327-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics