Skip to main content

Sharing the Caring Responsibility Between the Private and the Public: Childcare, Parental Choice, and Inequality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe

Abstract

It is increasingly recognised that early childhood education and care (ECEC) can contribute to equal opportunities. However, the conditions to realise this potential are far from being generally acquired as access to high-quality ECEC is unequal since children from poor families tend to be less often enrolled in ECEC than their better off peers. An overview of research examining this global phenomenon reveals that this inequality is not so much a matter of parental choice, but rather of structural barriers and therefore of policies. Countries that consider childcare as a public responsibility seem to do better than those that consider childcare as a private commodity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akgunduz, Y. E., and J. Plantenga. 2014. “Childcare in the Netherlands: Lessons in Privatisation.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 22 (3): 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. 2011. Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention. Science 333 (975–978): 975–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. 1997. “Psychology: Market, Metaphor and Metamorphosis.” Culture & Psychology 3 (2): 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadima, J., S. Barros, T. Ferreira, V. Coelho, C. Peixoto, A. I. Pinto, and M. Pessanha. 2016. “Variations of Classroom Quality in Infant Classrooms in Portugal.” EARLI SIG-5, Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T., L. Gambaro , and K. Stewart. 2019. Inequalities in the Experience of Early Education in England: Access, Peer Groups and Transitions. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, G. 2008. If It Don’t Make Dollars, Does That Mean That It Don’t Make Sense? Commercial, Nonprofit and Municipal Child Care in the City of Toronto. Toronto: Department of Management, University of Toronto Scarborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, D., and M. Burchinal. 1997. “Parents as Child Care Consumers.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 12: 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowsett, C. J., A. C. Huston, A. E. Imes, and L. Gennetian. 2008. “Structural and Process Features in Three Types of Child Care for Children from High and Low Income Families.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 23: 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. M., K. L. Maxwell, M. Burchinal, S. Alva, R. H. Bender, D. Bryant, and N. Zill. 2007. “Teachers’ Education, Classroom Quality, and Young Children’s Academic Skills: Results from Seven Studies of Preschool Programs.” Child Development 78: 558–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, P., L. C. H. Fernald, H. Alderman, J. Behrman, C. O'Gara, A. Yousafzai, and Global Child Development Steering Group. 2011. Child Development 2. Strategies for Reducing Inequalities and Improving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound. 2015. Working Conditions, Training of Early Childhood Care Workers and Quality of Services—A Systematic Review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2018. Council Recommendation on High Quality Early Childhood Education and Care Systems. SWD(2018) 173. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, H., A.-C. Guio, and E. Marlier. 2020. Feasibility Study for a Child Guarantee. Intermediate Report. Luxemburg: LISER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukkink, R. G., and A. Lont. (2007). “Does Training Matter? A Meta-Analysis and Review of Caregiver Training Studies.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 22: 294–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. 2018. “The Business of Care: Marketization and the New Geographies of Childcare.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 706–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambaro, L., K. Stewart, and J. Waldfogel. 2015. “A Question of Quality: Do Children from Disadvantaged Backgrounds Receive Lower Quality Early Childhood Education and Care?” British Educational Research Journal 41 (4): 553–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghysels, J., and W. Van Lancker. 2010. “De terugkeer van het Mattheüseffect? De casus van de kinderopvang in Vlaanderen.” Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 31 (2): 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnar, M. R., M. J. Van Ryzin, and D. Phillips. 2010. “The Rise in Cortisol in Family Day Care: Associations with Aspects of Care Quality, Child Behavior and Child Sex.” Child Development 81 (3): 851–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., K. M. La Paro, R. C. Pianta, and J. LoCasale-Crouch. 2014. Classroom Assessment Scoring System. Manual. Infant. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haut Conseil de la famille, de l’enfance et de l’âge. 2018. L’accueil des enfants de moins de trois ans. Tome I: Etat des lieux. Paris: HCFEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henly, J., and S. Lyons. 2000. “The Negotiation of Child Care and Employment Demands Among Low-Income Parents.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (4): 683–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, S., and M. Sigala. 2004. “Choice and the Relationship Between Identities and Behaviour for Mothers with Pre-School Children: Some Implications for Policy from a UK Study.” Journal of Social Policy 33 (3): 455–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S., and D. Wissoker. 1992. “Price, Quality and Income in Child Care Choice.” Journal of Human Resources 27 (1): 70–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, K. R., S. Q. Cabell, and J. LoCasale-Crouch. 2014. “CLASS-Infant: An Observational Measure for Assessing Teacher-Infant Interactions in Center-Based Childcare.” Early Education and Development 25 (4): 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., B. Spruyt, and M. Vandenbroeck. (2021). Is Everybody Happy? Exploring the Predictability of Parent Satisfaction with Childcare in Flanders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 55: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., B. Spruyt, Van drooghenbroeck, and M. Vandenbroeck. Forthcoming. “Is Everybody Happy? Exploring the Predictability of Parent Satisfaction with Childcare in Flanders.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind en Gezin. 2019. Jaarverslag 2018. Brussel: Kind en Gezin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and M. S. Fram. 2009. “Profiles of Choice: Parents’ Patterns of Priority in Child Care Decision-Making.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 24: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Paro, K. M., B. K. Hamre, and R. C. Pianta. 2012. Classroom Assessment Scoring System. Manual. Toddler. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Paro, K. M., A. C. Wiliamson, and B. Hatfield. 2014. “Assessing Quality in Toddler Classrooms Using the CLASS Toddler and the ITERS-R.” Early Education and Development 25 (6): 875–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. 2013. “Childcare Markets: An Introduction.” In Childcare Markets. Can They Deliver an Equitable Service?, edited by E. Lloyd and H. Penn, 3–18. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, K. A., and J. Waldfogel. 2005. “Early Childhood Care and Education: Effects on Ethnic and Racial Gaps in School Readiness.” The Future of Children 15 (1): 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M. K., and L. P. Jordan. 2006. “Choice and Accommodation in Parental Child Care Decisions.” Community Development 37 (2): 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, C., D. Van de gaer, J. L. Figueroa, and M. Vandenbroeck. 2018. “Effects of High Versus Low-Quality Preschool Education: A Longitudinal Study in Mauritius.” Economics of Education Review 65: 126–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, C., M. Vandenbroeck, and R. Roose. 2013. “The Greatest of Equalisers: A Critical Review of International Organisations’ Views on Early Childhood Care and Education.” Journal of Social Policy 42 (3): 451–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. 2013. “Need Markets Be the Only Show in Town?” In Childcare Markets. Can They Deliver an Equitable Service?, edited by E. Lloyd and H. Penn, 191–208. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noailly, J., S. Visser, and P. Grout. 2007. The Impact of Market Forces on the Provision of Childcare: Insights from the 2005 Childcare Act in the Netherlands. Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2015. Starting Strong IV. Monitoring Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: O.E.C.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2019. Good Practice for Good Jobs in Early Childhood Education and Care: Eight Policy Measures from OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2020. Education at a glance. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleman, B., A. Lazzari, I. Budginaite, H. Siarova, H. Hauari, J. Peeters, and C. Cameron. 2018. “Continuous Professional Development and ECEC Quality: Findings from a European Systematic Literature Review.” European Journal of Education 53 (1): 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyton, V., A. Jacobs, M. O'Brien, and C. Roy. 2001. Reasons for Choosing Child Care: Associations with Family Factors, Quality, and Satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 16: 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, H. 2013. “Childcare Markets: Do They Work?” In Childcare Markets. Can They Deliver an Equitable Service?, edited by H. Lloyd and H. Penn, 19–42. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantenga, J. 2013. “Local Providers and Loyal Partners: Competition and Consumer Choice in the Dutch Childcare Market.” In Childcare Markets. Can They Deliver an Equitable Service?, edited by E. Lloyd and H. Penn, 63–77. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruutiainen, V., M. Alasuutari, and K. Karila. 2019. “Rationalising Public Support for Private Early Childhood Education and Care: The Case of Finland.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, On line first. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1665497.

  • Samardzic-Markovic, S. 2014. Inclusion from the Start. Guidelines on Inclusive Early Childhood Care and Education for Roma Children. Brussels: Council of Europe – UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlay, A., H. Tran, M. Weinraub, and M. Harmon. 2005. “Teasing Apart the Child Care Conundrum: A Factorial Analysis of Perceptions of Child Care Quality, Fair Market Price and Willingness to Pay by Low-Income, African-American Parents.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 20: 393–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket. 2019. Curriculum for the preschool Lpfö 18. Stockholm: Frizes kundservice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slot, P., M.-K. Lerkkanen, and P. Leseman. 2016. The Relations Between Structural Quality and Process Quality in European Early Childhood Education and Care Provisions: Secondary Analyses of Large Scale Studies in Five Countries. Utrecht: Utrecht University - CARE project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, J. F., P. S. Schober, and C. K. Spiess. 2018. “Parental Socio-Economic Status and Childcare Quality: Early Inequalities in Educational Opportunity?” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 44: 304–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., A. Stein, P. Leach, J. Barnes, and L. E. Malmberg. 2007. “Family and Child Factors Related to the Use of Non-Maternal Infant Care: An English Study.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 26 (1): 118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teppers, E., W. Schepers, and T. Van Regenmortel. 2019. Het gebruik van en de behoefte aan kinderopvang voor baby’s en peuters jonger dan 3 jaar in het Vlaamse Gewest. Leuven: Steunpunt Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, A. C., and K. M. La Paro. 2009. “Measuring the Quality of Teacher-Child Interactions in Toddler Child Care.” Early Education and Development 20 (2): 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavolini, E., and W. Van Lancker. 2018. “The Matthew Effect in Childcare Use: A Matter of Policies or Preferences?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 878–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M., M. Vandenbroeck, K. Van Laere, A. Lazzari, and J. Peeters. 2012. “Towards Competent Systems in Early Childhood Education and Care. Implications for Policy and Practice.” European Journal of Education 47 (4): 508–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker, W. 2013. “Putting the Child-Centred Investment Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU27.” European Journal of Social Security 15 (1): 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker, W., and J. Ghysels. 2016. “Explaining Patterns of Inequality in Childcare Service Use Across 31 Developed Economies: A Welfare State Perspective.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 57 (5): 310–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker, W. 2018. “Reducing Inequality in Childcare Service Use Across European Countries: What (If Any) Is the Role of Social Spending?” Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 271–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M. 2019. Feasibility Study for a Child Guarantee. Policy Paper on Early Childhood Education and Care. Unpublished Report. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., S. De Visscher, K. Van Nuffel, and J. Ferla. 2008. “Mothers’ Search for Infant Child Care: The Dynamic Relationship Between Availability and Desirability in a Continental European Welfare State.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 23 (2): 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., F. Laevers, H. Hulpia, M. Daems, B. Declercq, J. Janssen, and C. Van Cleynenbreugel. 2016. MeMoQ Deelrapport 14. Samenvatting van de nulmeting. Brussel: Kind en Gezin; Gent: UGent; Leuven: KU Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., and A. Lazzari. 2014. “Accessibility of Early Childhood Education and Care: A State of Affairs.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 22 (3): 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., K. Lenaerts, and M . Beblavy. 2018. Benefits of Early Childhood Education and Care and the Conditions for Obtaining Them. Brussels: European Expert Network on Economics of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf, W. 2020. Diversiteit, inclusie en kwaliteit in het hybride kinderopvangstelsel in Nederland. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf, W. M., P. L. Slot, P. N. Kenis, and P. P. M. Leseman. 2020. “Hybrid Organizations in the Dutch ECEC Privatized and Harmonized System: Relations with Quality of Education and Care.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 53: 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker, W., and Vandenbroeck, M. 2019. De verdeling van de kinderopvang in Vlaanderen en in de centrumsteden: spanning tussen de economische en sociale functie van kinderopvang. Leuven: KU Leuven; Gent: UGent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. R. 1991. “Public Policy and the Supply of Child Care Services.” In Economics of Child Care, edited by D. M. Blau, 51–77. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, G. 2013. “Tinkering with Early Childhood Education and Care: Early Education Vouchers in Hong Kong.” In Childcare Markets. Can They Deliver an Equitable Service?, edited by H. Lloyd and H. Penn, 79–95. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Vandenbroeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vandenbroeck, M., Van Lancker, W., Janssen, J. (2021). Sharing the Caring Responsibility Between the Private and the Public: Childcare, Parental Choice, and Inequality. In: Castrén, AM., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73305-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73306-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics