Skip to main content
  • 503 Accesses

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes are questionnaires designed to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This is important to measure in SLE because the burden of symptoms that patients experience is often not reflected in measures of disease activity, leading to a discordance in the way patients versus clinicians perceive disease state. As a result, questionnaires that are specific to the experience of patients with SLE have been developed in addition to generic PROs. Utilizing PROs encourages clinical conversations, engaging patients as stakeholders in their own care. Working toward this patient empowerment, PROs can be integrated into clinics with minor adjustments to work flow; electronic administration and the utilization of spydergrams increases efficiency and interpretability. Because PROs measure aspects of HRQoL that often cannot be addressed by medication alone, building toward integrated care and connecting patients to interdisciplinary resources will be key in maximizing the benefit of PROs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Strand V, Simon L, Meara A, Touma Z. Measurement properties of selected patient-reported outcome measures for use in randomised controlled trials in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Lupus Sci Med. 2020;7(1):e000373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smolen JS, Strand V, Cardiel M, Edworthy S, Furst D, Gladman D, et al. Randomized clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies in systemic lupus erythematosus: consensus on a preliminary core set of outcome domains. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(2):504–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strand V, Aranow C, Cardiel M, Alarcon-Segovia D, Furie R, Sherrer Y, et al. Improvement in health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing LJP 394 treatment with placebo. Lupus. 2003;12(9):677–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Touma Z, Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Is there an advantage over SF-36 with a quality of life measure that is specific to systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(9):1898–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jolly M. How does quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compare with that of other common chronic illnesses. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(9):1706–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strand V, Gladman D, Isenberg D, Petri M, Smolen J, Tugwell P. Endpoints: consensus recommendations from OMERACT IV. Outcome measures in rheumatology. Lupus. 2000;9(5):322–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hays R, Sherbourne C, Mazel R. The rand 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yellen S, Cella D, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1997;13(2):63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cella D, Yount S, Sorensen M, Chartash E, Sengupta N, Grober J. Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(5):811–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandran V, Bhella S, Schentag C, Gladman D. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):936–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cleanthous S, Tyagi M, Isenberg DA, Newman SP. What do we know about self-reported fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2012;21(5):465–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwan A, Strand V, Touma Z. The role of patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Treat Option Rheumatol. 2017;3(4):308–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Furie R, Petri M, Strand V, Gladman D, Zhong Z, Freimuth W. Clinical, laboratory and health-related quality of life correlates of systemic lupus erythematosus responder index response: a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 belimumab trials. Lupus Sci Med. 2014;1(1):e000031.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Strand V, Levy R, Cervera R, Petri M, Birch H, Freimuth W, et al. Improvements in health-related quality of life with belimumab, a B-lymphocyte stimulator-specific inhibitor, in patients with autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus from the randomised controlled BLISS trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;73(5):838–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strand V, Berry P, Lin X, Asukai Y, Punwaney R, Ramachandran S. Long-term impact of Belimumab on health-related quality of life and fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: six years of treatment. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(6):829–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Strand V, Chu A. Measuring outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(4):455–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahieu M, Yount S, Ramsey-Goldman R. Patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2016;42(2):253–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ow YL, Thumboo J, Cella D, Cheung YB, Yong Fong K, Wee HL. Domains of health-related quality of life important and relevant to multiethnic English-speaking Asian systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a focus group study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(6):899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oude Voshaar MA, ten Klooster PM, Glas CA, Vonkeman HE, Taal E, Krishnan E, et al. Calibration of the PROMIS physical function item bank in Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fries JF, Cella D, Rose M, Krishnan E, Bruce B. Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(9):2061–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kasturi S, Szymonifka J, Berman J, Kirou K, Levine A, Sammaritano L, et al. Responsiveness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Global Health short form in outpatients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72(9):1282–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McElhone K, Abbott J, Shelmerdine J, Bruce I, Ahmad Y, Gordon C, et al. Development and validation of a disease-specific health-related quality of life measure, the LupusQol, for adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(6):972–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McElhone K, Burnell J, Sutton C, Abbott J, Lanyon P, Rahman A, et al. Is the disease-specific Lupusqol sensitive to changes of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients after treatment of a flare? Value Health. 2014;17(7):A538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. González-Rodríguez V, Peralta-Ramírez MI, Navarrete-Navarrete N, Callejas-Rubio JL, Santos Ruiz AM, Khamashta M. Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of a disease-specific quality of life measure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the Lupus quality of life. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;134(1):13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azizoddin DR, Weinberg S, Gandhi N, Arora S, Block JA, Sequeira W, et al. Validation of the LupusPRO version 1.8: an update to a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2018;27(5):728–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jolly M, Garris CP, Mikolaitis RA, Jhingran PM, Dennis G, Wallace DJ, et al. Development and validation of the lupus impact tracker: a patient-completed tool for clinical practice to assess and monitor the impact of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(10):1542–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jolly M, Kosinski M, Garris CP, Oglesby AK. Prospective validation of the lupus impact tracker: a patient-completed tool for clinical practice to evaluate the impact of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(6):1422–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leong K, Kong K, Thong B, Koh E, Lian T, Teh C, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a systemic lupus erythematosus-specific quality-of-life instrument (SLEQOL). Rheumatology. 2005;44(10):1267–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Doward LC, McKenna SP, Whalley D, Tennant A, Griffiths B, Emery P, et al. The development of the L-QoL: a quality-of-life instrument specific to systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(2):196–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ara R, Brazier J. Populating an economic model with health state utility values: moving toward better practice. Value Health. 2010;13(5):509–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ara R, Brazier J. Using health state utility values from the general population to approximate baselines in decision analytic models when condition-specific data are not available. Value Health. 2011;14(4):539–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang S, Wu B, Zhu L, Leng L, Bucala R, Lu L. Construct and criterion validity of the euro Qol-5D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98883.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison M, Ahmad Y, Haque S, Dale N, Teh L, SNOWDEN N, et al. Construct and criterion validity of the short form-6D utility measure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(4):735–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wolfe F, Michaud K, Li T, Katz R. EQ-5D and SF-36 quality of life measures in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis, noninflammatory rheumatic disorders, and fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2009;37(2):296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mackay M. Lupus brain fog: a biologic perspective on cognitive impairment, depression, and fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Res. 2015;63(1–3):26–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nantes S, Strand V, Su J, Touma Z. Comparison of the sensitivity to change of the 36-item short form health survey and the lupus quality of life measure using various definitions of minimum clinically important differences in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;70(1):125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Strand V, Boers M, Idzedza L, Kirwan J, Kvien T, Tugwell P, et al. It's good to feel better but It's better to feel good and even better to feel good as soon as possible for as long as possible. Response criteria and the importance of change at OMERACT 10: figure 1. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(8):1720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Strand V, Crawford B, Singh J, Choy E, Smolen J, Khanna D. Use of “spydergrams” to present and interpret SF-36 health-related quality of life data across rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(12):1800–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yen JC, Abrahamowicz M, Dobkin PL, Clarke AE, Battista RN, Fortin PR. Determinants of discordance between patients and physicians in their assessment of lupus disease activity. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(9):1967–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Golder V, Ooi JJY, Antony AS, Ko T, Morton S, Kandane-Rathnayake R, et al. Discordance of patient and physician health status concerns in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2018;27(3):501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aranow C, Askanase A, Oon S, Huq M, Calderone A, Morand E et al. Laboratory investigation results influence Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) of disease activity in SLE. Ann Rheumat Dis. 2020;:annrheumdis-2019-216753.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pisetsky D, Clowse M, Criscione-Schreiber L, Rogers J. A novel system to categorize the symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(6):735–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mosley-Williams A, Lumley M, Gillis M, Leisen J, Guice D. Barriers to treatment adherence among African American and white women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47(6):630–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Leung J, Baker EA, Kim AHJ. Exploring intentional medication non-adherence in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of physician–patient interactions. Rheumatology Advances in Practice [Internet]. 2021;5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rogers J, Eudy A, Pisetsky D, Criscione-Schreiber L, Sun K, Doss J, et al. Using clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures to categorize lupus subtypes. Arth Care Res. 2020;73(3):386–93.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Leung J, Ra J, Baker E, Kim A. “…Not having the real support that we need”: patients’ experiences with ambiguity of systemic lupus erythematosus and Erosion of social support. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2019;1(3):135–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Mazzoni D, Cicognani E. Social support and health in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a literature review. Lupus. 2011;20(11):1117–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hale ED, Treharne GJ, Lyons AC, Norton Y, Mole S, Mitton DL, et al. “Joining the dots” for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: personal perspectives of health care from a qualitative study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(5):585–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kiani AN, Strand V, Fang H, Jaranilla J, Petri M. Predictors of self-reported health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(9):1651–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred H. J. Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McMorrow, L., Leung, J., Strand, V., Kim, A.H.J. (2021). Patient-Reported Outcomes in SLE. In: Touma, Z. (eds) Outcome Measures and Metrics in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73303-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73303-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73302-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73303-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics