Skip to main content

Is 3D Better than 2D During Stress Echo?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical 3D Echocardiography

Abstract

Despite the well-established diagnostic and prognostic role of two dimensional (2D) stress echocardiography (SE), 2D SE has its limitations. Multiple views of the left ventricle must be obtained within 90 seconds, and foreshortening of the left ventricle (LV) is a frequently encountered problem. Real time three-dimensional (3D) SE can overcome many limitations of 2D SE. All LV segments can be assessed simultaneously in different planes and the images can be displayed in multiplane or multislice views which provides for more accurate comparison. Moreover, the imaging acquisition time is significantly shorter in 3D or biplane modes than with 2D, and analysis of the 3D data set has been greatly facilitated by the recent advances in automated software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, Chen MH, Marshall JE, Porter TR, et al. Guidelines for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease: from the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(1):1–41.e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steeds RP, Wheeler R, Bhattacharyya S, Reiken J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Senior R, et al. Stress echocardiography in coronary artery disease: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract. 2019;6(2):G17–g33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurunathan S, Senior R. Stress echocardiography in stable coronary artery disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(12):121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berbarie RF, Dib E, Ahmad M. Stress echocardiography using real-time three-dimensional imaging. Echocardiography. 2018;35(8):1196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang HS, Pellikka PA, McCully RB, Oh JK, Kukuzke JA, Khandheria BK, et al. Role of biplane and biplane echocardiographically guided 3-dimensional echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(9):1136–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peteiro J, Piñon P, Perez R, Monserrat L, Perez D, Castro-Beiras A. Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional exercise echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(8):959–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmad M, Xie T, McCulloch M, Abreo G, Runge M. Real-time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessment stress echocardiography in assessment of ischemia: comparison with two-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1303–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggeli C, Felekos I, Roussakis G, Kazazaki C, Lagoudakou S, Pietri P, et al. Value of real-time three-dimensional adenosine stress contrast echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(9):648–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takeuchi M, Otani S, Weinert L, Spencer KT, Lang RM. Comparison of contrast-enhanced real-time live 3-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography with contrast 2-dimensional echocardiography for detecting stress-induced wall-motion abnormalities. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(3):294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eroglu E, D'Hooge J, Herbots L, Thijs D, Dubois C, Sinnaeve P, et al. Comparison of real-time tri-plane and conventional 2D dobutamine stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(14):1719–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johri AM, Chitty DW, Hua L, Marincheva G, Picard MH. Assessment of image quality in real time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography: an integrated 2D/3D approach. Echocardiography. 2015;32(3):496–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang HS, Bansal RC, Mookadam F, Khandheria BK, Tajik AJ, Chandrasekaran K. Practical guide for three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using a fully sampled matrix array transducer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(9):979–89. quiz 1081-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shivalkar B, De Keersmaeker A, Van Hoeck N, Belkova P, Van de Heyning CM, De Maeyer C, et al. Is 3D Dobutamine stress echocardiography ready for prime time? Diagnostic and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(4):428–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoogslag GE, Joyce E, Bax JJ, Ajmone Marsan N, Delgado V. Assessment of global left ventricular excursion using three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography to identify significant coronary artery disease. Echocardiography. 2016;33(10):1532–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker KM, Clark AP, Goodman NC, Glover DK, Holmes JW. Comparison of quantitative wall-motion analysis and strain for detection of coronary stenosis with three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2015;32(2):349–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lancellotti P, Pellikka PA, Budts W, Chaudhry FA, Donal E, Dulgheru R, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in non-ischaemic heart disease: recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(11):1191–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka H, Oishi Y, Mizuguchi Y, Emi S, Ishimoto T, Nagase N, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of dobutamine-induced changes in regional myocardial deformation in ischemic myocardium using ultrasonic strain measurements: the role of circumferential myocardial shortening. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(11):1294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang RM, Addetia K, Narang A, Mor-Avi V. 3-dimensional echocardiography: latest developments and future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(12):1854–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, H.S., Chandrasekaran, K. (2022). Is 3D Better than 2D During Stress Echo?. In: Maalouf, J.F., Faletra, F.F., Asirvatham, S.J., Chandrasekaran, K. (eds) Practical 3D Echocardiography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72941-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72941-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72941-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics