Abstract
It is often assumed that by definition the nonreligious do not have a sense of ultimate meaning. Conversely, this chapter shows that community organisers derive ultimate meaning from their struggle against the dehumanising impact of capitalism. Ultimate meaning is radically present in their lives—it’s just that it is not expressed in metaphysical terms. Rather, as one interlocutor put it, “I think these things come about through practice”. By framing them in these superlative terms, I suggest that these practices are indispensable components of my interlocutors’ identity. This has two consequences for those aiming to mobilise world repairing work: first, rather than only seeking a shared set of beliefs, values and issues, in some cases it may prove worthwhile to draw on a shared practice; and second, asking those on the frontline to compromise their practices in the interests of some greater “end” may lead to disillusionment and disaffection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Back, L. (2015). Why Everyday Life Matters: Class, Community and Making Life Livable. Sociology, 49(5), 820–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515589292
Barman, J. (2008). Cascadia Once Upon A Time. In D. Todd (Ed.), Cascadia: The Elusive Utopia. Ronsdale Press.
Beaman, L. G. (2017). Living Well Together in a (Non)Religious Future: Contributions from the Sociology of Religion. Sociology of Religion, 78(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srw054
Bonjour, S., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2018). The ‘Migrant with Poor Prospects’: Racialized Intersections of Class and Culture in Dutch Civic Integration Debates. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(5), 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1339897
Bruce, S. (2003). The Social Process of Secularization. In R. K. Fenn (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Calhoun, C. (2004, June 21). The Democratic Integration of Europe. Eurozine (blog). https://www.eurozine.com/the-democratic-integration-of-europe/
Casanova, J. (2007). Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. In L. Beaman & P. Beyer (Eds.), Religion, Globalization, and Culture (pp. 101–20). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154070.i-608.39
Day, A. (2010). Researching Belief Without Asking Religious Questions. Fieldwork in Religion, 4(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1558/firn.v4i1.86
Day, A. (2013). Believing in Belonging: Belief and Social Identity in the Modern World. Oxford University Press.
Dinham, A. (2012). Faith and Social Capital after the Debt Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dobbelaere, K. (2011). The Meaning and Scope of Secularization. In The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588961.013.0034.
Gordon, U. (2018). Prefigurative Politics Between Ethical Practice and Absent Promise. Political Studies, 66(2), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717722363
Habermas, J. (2011). ‘The Political’: The Rational Meaning of a Questionable Inheritance of Political Theology. In E. Mendieta & J. Van Antwerpen (Eds.), The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere (5th PRINTING edn.). Columbia University Press.
Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940842
Habermas, J. (2005). Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. T. McCarthy. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
Laidlaw, J. (2014). The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, L. (2015). Recognizing the Non-Religious: Reimagining the Secular. Oxford University Press.
Manning, C. (2018). Meaning Making Narratives Among Non-Religious Individuals Facing the End of Life. Understanding Unbelief. https://research.kent.ac.uk/understandingunbelief/research/research-projects-2/manning/
Martin, D. (1993). A General Theory of Secularization. Gregg Revivals.
McAlexander, J. H., Dufault, B. L., Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2014). The Marketization of Religion: Field, Capital, and Consumer Identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 858–875. https://doi.org/10.1086/677894
Mellor, P. A., & Schilling, C. (1997). Confluent Love and the Cult of the Dyad: The Pre-Contractual Foundations of Modern Contractarian Relationships. In J. Davies & G. Loughlin (Eds.), Sex These Days: Essays on Theology, Sexuality and Society. Sheffield Academic Press.
Parsons, T. (1968). On the Concept of Value-Commitments. Sociological Inquiry, 38(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1968.tb00679.x
Sandel, M. J. (2013). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Skeggs, B. (2014). Values beyond Value? Is Anything beyond the Logic of Capital? The British Journal of Sociology, 65(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12072
Skidelsky, R., & Skidelsky, E. (2013). How Much Is Enough?: Money and Good Life. Penguin.
Woodhead, L. (2016). Is No Religion the New Religion?.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stacey, T. (2021). Reweaving Spheres: Towards an Ultimate Meaning of Practice. In: Beaman, L.G., Stacey, T. (eds) Nonreligious Imaginaries of World Repairing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72881-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72881-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72880-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72881-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)