Skip to main content

Theoretical and Methodological Background to Understandings of (Non)religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nonreligious Imaginaries of World Repairing

Abstract

The importance of studying nonreligion is growing with the increase of people in many countries who do not identify as religious or as having a religion. Conceptualising nonreligion, however, is inherently difficult because the phenomenon is primarily negative: it is not religion. Positive conceptions therefore usually insist that nonreligion bear some relation to religion. This chapter suggests the use of Weber’s idea of systems of life regulation as a way forward. It identifies various areas of social life where religious systems of life regulation operate and where therefore nonreligious life regulation might be found, operationalized, and studied. These include sexual, food, and life passage regulation, among others. Illustrations of nonreligious approaches to these areas are provided to show how such regulation might work without being another form of or substitute for religion, without using religious content or being structured through familiar religious determinations such as sacredness, transcendence, or super-empirical actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Askegaard, S., & al., e. (2014). Moralities in Food and Health Research. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(17–18), 1800–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, J. (2006). Food, Morals and Meaning: The Pleasure and Anxiety of Eating. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grauel, J. (2016). Being Authentic or Being Responsible? Food Consumption, Morality and the Presentation of Self. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 852–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (2012). Talking About a Revolution: Terminology for the New Field of Non-religion Studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (2015). Recognizing the Non-religious: Reimagining the Secular. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2019). In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at a Rapid Pace: An Update on America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, D., & Rosta, G. (2017). Religion and Modernity: An International Comparison. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quack, J. (2014). Outline of a Relational Approach to ‘Nonreligion’. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 26(4/5), 439–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quack, J., Schuh, C., & Kind, S. (2020). The Diversity of Nonreligion: Normativities and Contested Relations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, A. S. (2018). Living and Dealing with Food in an Affluent Society—A Case for the Study of Lived (Non)Religion. Religions, 9(10), 306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, A. S. (2019). Dominion, Stewardship and Reconciliation in the Accounts of Ordinary People Eating Animals. Religions, 10(12), 699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, E. J. (1986). Comparative Religion: A History (2nd ed.). Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, H., & Dickey Young, P. (2020). Bisexuality, (Non)religion and Spirituality in Canadian Young Adults. In A. K.-T. Yip & A. Toft (Eds.), Bisexuality, Religion and Spirituality (pp. 11–28). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, A. (2015). Are Religious ‘Nones’ Secular? The Case of the Nones in Australia. Journal of Belief and Values, 36(2), 239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D. (2009). The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D., & Chaves, M. (2016). Is the United States a Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis? American Journal of Sociology, 121(5), 1517–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, S. (2019). I’m Not Really a Non-religious Person’: Diversity among Young People of No Religion. In E. Arweck & H. Shipley (Eds.), Young People and the Diversity of (Non) Religious Identities in International Perspective (pp. 149–164). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 323–359). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, L. (2016). The Rise of ‘No Religion’ in Britain: The Emergence of a New Cultural Majority. Journal of the British Academy, 4, 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (Ed.). (2010). Atheism and Secularity. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P., Galen, L. W., & Pasquale, F. L. (Eds.). (2016). The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Beyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beyer, P. (2021). Theoretical and Methodological Background to Understandings of (Non)religion. In: Beaman, L.G., Stacey, T. (eds) Nonreligious Imaginaries of World Repairing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72881-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics