Abstract
The scope of this chapter is to examine the impact of CER related performance on firms’ systematic risk, by controlling for potential endogeneity between CER and systematic risk and by distinguishing sample firms between common law and code law countries, evidenced as significant factors for the inconsistency of empirical results by previous studies. Empirical results indicated that CER performance provides a negative and significant impact on firm systematic risk (beta) verifying existing evidence on the literature that CER investments reduce the firm’s systematic risk, so leading us to accept the risk reduction hypothesis. In addition, firms with more stakeholder oriented CER activities are associated with more risk aversion and ethical behavior, especially towards its employees and the environment, thus perceived as having less uncertainty and risk, so investors require a smaller risk premium to invest in such corporations. Moreover, after separating sample firms based on their country’s legal origin we found that CER performing firms in common law countries are associated with higher systematic risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albuquerque, R., Y. Koskinen, and C. Zhang. 2019. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science 65 (10): 4451–4469.
Allen, F., E. Carletti, and R. Marquez. 2009. Stakeholder capitalism, Corporate governance, and firm value. Wharton Finance Working Paper.
Barnea, A., and A. Roubin. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1): 71–86.
Barnett, M.L., and R.M. Salomon. 2012. Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 33: 1304–1320.
Baum, C.F. 2006. An introduction to econometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press Books, StataCorp LP.
Benlemlih, M., and I. Girerd-Potin. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 44 (7–8): 1137–1166.
Cai, L., J. Cui, and H. Jo. 2016. Corporate environmental responsibility and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics 139: 563–594.
Cespa, G., and G. Cestone. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): 741–771.
Chabowski, B., W.-C. Chiang, K. Deng, and L. Sun. 2019. Environmental inefficiency and bond credit rating. Journal of Economics and Business 101: 17–37.
Chakraborty, A., L.S. Gao, and S. Sheikh. 2019. Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk. Journal of Economic and Business 101: 58–72.
Chava, S. 2011. Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Working paper. Georgia Institute of Technology. Accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1677653
Cheng, B., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal 35 (1): 1–23.
Dhaliwal, D., O. Li, A. Zhang, and Y. Yang. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiations of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86 (1): 59–100.
El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C. Kwok, and D. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (9): 2388–2406.
Godfrey, P.C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review 30: 777–798.
Godfrey, P.C., C. Merrill, and J. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30 (4): 425–445.
Hong, H., J.D. Kubik, and J.A. Scheinkman. 2012. Financial constraints on corporate goodness. NBER working paper, 18476. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.
Kim, Y., M. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87: 761–796.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1134–1155.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2008. The economic consequence of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46: 285–332.
Liang, H., and L. Renneboog. 2017. On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance 72 (2): 853–910.
Melo, T. 2012. Determinants of corporate social performance: The influence of organizational culture, management tenure and financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal 8 (1): 33–47.
Nguyen, P., and A. Nguyen. 2015. The effect of corporate social responsibility on firm risk. Social Responsibility Journal 11 (2): 324–339.
Sen, S., C.B. Bhattacharya, and D. Korschun. 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (2): 158–166.
Sharfman, M.P., and C.S. Fernando. 2008. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal 29: 569–592.
Suto, M., and H. Takehara. 2018. Corporate social responsibility and corporate finance in Japan. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dimitropoulos, P., Koronios, K. (2021). Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Corporate Risk. In: Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Accounting and Corporate Finance in the EU. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72773-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72773-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72772-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72773-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)