Skip to main content

Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Accounting Conservatism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Accounting and Corporate Finance in the EU

Abstract

The scope of this chapter is to shed further light on the impact of CER performance and its components on the level of conservative financial reporting by utilizing a multi-country research setting and incorporating various sub-categories of environmental performance and conservatism metrics including the verification of negative earnings, negative cash flows and a firm-specific measure of conservatism (the C-score proposed by Khan and Watts (J Account Econ 48:132–150, 2009)), thus providing more thorough evidence in the existing literature regarding the impact of CER on the conservatism of accounting numbers with the EU. The empirical analysis in this chapter corroborates previous arguments in the literature on the negative association between CER and conservatism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 83–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 207–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, B., P. Chen, J.H. Grenier, and D.L. Heitger. 2018. Corporate social responsibility assurance and reporting quality: Evidence from restatements. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 37 (2): 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Q., P.-C. Chen, and G.L. Lobo. 2020. Is corporate social responsibility performance related to conditional accounting conservatism? Accounting Horizons. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-18-111.

  • Cheng, C.-L., and F.-H. Kung. 2016. The effects of mandatory corporate social responsibility policy on accounting conservatism. Review of Accounting and Finance 15 (1): 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S.Y., P.K. Kang, C. Lee, and C.K. Park. 2020. Financial reporting conservatism and voluntary CSR disclosure. Accounting Horizons. https://doi.org/10.2308/hotizons-17-093.

  • Cui, J., H. Jo, and H. Na. 2016. Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics 148 (3): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P.M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (1): 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitropoulos, P., D. Asteriou, and C. Sιriopoulos. 2012. Euro adoption and the quality of accounting information. Managerial Auditing Journal 27 (3): 299–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flammer, C., and P. Bansal. 2017. Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal 38 (9): 1827–1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R.N., S. Harrast, J. Mattingly, and L. Olsen. 2013. The relation between accounting conservatism and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation. Business and Society Review 118 (2): 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. 2020. Corporate social responsibility and accounting conservatism. International Journal of Economics and Business Research 19 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., and M.L. Andersen. 2011. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4): 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I., and G. Serafeim. 2017. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1799589

  • Khan, M., and R.L. Watts. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2-3): 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., M.S. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87 (3): 761–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFond, R., and R.L. Watts. 2008. The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review 83 (2): 447–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventis, S., P. Dimitropoulos, and S. Owusu-Ansah. 2013. Corporate governance and accounting conservatism: Evidence from the banking industry. Corporate Governance: An International Review 21 (3): 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins, K.V., H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo. 2017. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 72 (4): 1785–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manganaris, P., E. Beccalli, and P. Dimitropoulos. 2017. Bank transparency and the crisis. The British Accounting Review 49 (2): 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obigbemi, I.F., E.O. Omolehinwa, D.O. Mukoro, E. Ben-Caleb, and O.A. Olusanmi. 2016. Earnings management and board structure: Evidence from Nigeria. SAGE Open 6 (3): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patro, B., and J.K. Pattanayak. 2017. Association of CSR disclosure with accounting conservatism: A study of select Indian mining firms. Indian Journal of Finance 11 (3): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyo, G., and H.-Y. Lee. 2013. The association between corporate social responsibility activities and earnings quality: Evidence from donations and voluntary issuance of CSR reports. The Journal of Applied Business Research 29 (3): 945–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, D.A., and T. Shevlin. 2001. Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 321–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suto, M., and H. Takehara. 2018. Corporate social responsibility and corporate finance in Japan. Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting - Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17 (3): 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J.S., Y.J. Yeo, and O.J. Kwon. 2014. The effect of excellence in corporate social responsibility activities on accounting conservatism. Korean Management Review 43 (6): 1931–1961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dimitropoulos, P., Koronios, K. (2021). Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Accounting Conservatism. In: Corporate Environmental Responsibility, Accounting and Corporate Finance in the EU. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72773-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics