Abstract
Nowadays, software is developed in teams. But how should software development teams be staffed in order to build a high performing team?
This study investigates how the different roles in a software development team derived from the software lifecycle – project leader, requirements engineer, architect/designer, and developer/tester/maintainer – should be staffed with respect to HEXACO personality traits in order to form a high performing team.
We conduct a qualitative analysis by leading 12 semistructured interviews with experts from the software engineering sector and with working experience of at least 2 years. We follow a Grounded Theory approach to derive personality traits and link them to software engineering roles.
Our study shows that different personality profiles are beneficial for different roles and that corresponding staffing decisions can be beneficial for team performance.
Our results support the composition of software engineering teams with the aim to successfully build high performing teams.
Further studies can build on our findings, e.g. by measuring certain software quality aspects and connecting them to the personality profile of the developing team.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The corresponding HEXACO personality inventory as well as the scoring key are freely available at http://hexaco.org/hexaco-inventory.
- 2.
- 3.
The transcripts of the interviews are in German.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Acuña, S.T., Gómez, M.N., Hannay, J.E., Juristo, N., Pfahl, D.: Are team personality and climate related to satisfaction and software quality? Aggregating results from a twice replicated experiment. Inf. Softw. Technol. 57, 141–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.002. ISSN 09505849
Allen, N.J., O’Neill, T.: Team composition and performance. In: Chiocchio, F., Kevin Kelloway, E., Hobbs, B. (eds.) The Psychology and Management of Project Teams, pp. 301–328. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199861378.003.0012. ISBN 9780199861378
Amin, A., Rehman, M., Basri, S., Fadzil Hassan, M.: A proposed conceptual framework of programmer’s creativity. In: 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), pp. 108–113, Piscataway, NJ. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359011. ISBN 978-1-4799-1723-5
André, M., Baldoquín, M.G., Acuña, S.T.: Formal model for assigning human resources to teams in software projects. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(3), 259–275 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.011. ISSN 09505849
Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., Iriberri, N.: The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: evidence from the field. Manage. Sci. 58(1), 78–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1348. ISSN 0025-1909
Ashton, M.C.: Individual Differences and Personality, 3rd edn. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Ltd., London (2018). ISBN 0128098465
Ashton, M.C., Lee, K.: Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the hexaco model of personality structure. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. Off. J. Society Pers. Soc. Psychol. Inc. 11(2), 150–166 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907. ISSN 1088-8683
Ashton, M.C., Lee, K.: The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the hexaco and five-factor models of personality. J. Res. Pers. 42(5), 1216–1228 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006. ISSN 00926566
Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L.R.: A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 english personality-descriptive adjectives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87(5), 707–721 (2004). https://search.proquest.com/docview/614397034?accountid=15918. ISSN 0022-3514
Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R.E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., de Raad, B.: A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86(2), 356–366 (2004). https://search.proquest.com/docview/614386182?accountid=15918. ISSN 0022-3514
Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., Mount, M.K.: Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 83(3), 377–391 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377. ISSN 0021-9010
Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016). https://books.google.de/books?id=vCq5m2hPkOMC. ISBN 9780199689453
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K.: Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. Learning&Skills Research Centre (2004). https://web.archive.org/web/20081205043419if_/http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf
Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th edn. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015). ISBN 9781412997461
Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., Inc Psychological Assessment Resources: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources (1992). https://books.google.de/books?id=mp3zNwAACAAJ
da Silva, F.Q.B., França, A.C.C., Suassuna, M., de Sousa, M., Leila, M.R., Rossiley, I., de Miranda, R.C.G., Gouveia, T.B., Monteiro, C.V.F., Lucena, E., Cardozo, E.S.F., Espindola, E.: Team building criteria in software projects: a mix-method replicated study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(7), 1316–1340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.11.006. ISSN 09505849
Graziotin, D.: The dynamics of creativity in software development. In: Proceedings of the PROFES 2013, pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.703568. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.6045.pdf
DeMarco, T., Lister, T.R.: Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2014). ISBN 0321934113
Fenwick, G.D., Neal, D.J.: Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender Work Organ. 8(2), 205–225 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00129. ISSN 0968-6673
Flick, U.: Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung, volume 55694 of Rororo Rowohlts Enzyklopädie. rowohlts enzyklopädie im Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 8. auflage, originalausgabe edition (2017). ISBN 9783499556944
Gardner, W.: Using the myers-briggs type indicator to study managers: a literature review and research agenda. J. Manage. 22(1), 45–83 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90012-4. https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0149206396900124/1-s2.0-S0149206396900124-main.pdf?tid=52c20eea-b1ba-4479-82f0-0dc85130d72e&acdnat=15282793390042a77b79121c1b90ad62bfb5d27c24. ISSN 01492063
Gila, A.R., Jaafa, J., Omar, M., Tunio, M.Z.: Impact of personality and gender diversity on software development teams’ performance. In: International Conference on Computer, Communications, and Control Technology (I4CT 2014), pp. 261–265. IEEE, Piscataway (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/I4CT.2014.6914186. ISBN 978-1-4799-4555-9
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer Forschung. Programmbereich Gesundheit. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 3., unveränderte auflage edition (2010). ISBN 9783456849065
Grams, D., Frank, T., Rehberger, S., Vogel-Heuser, B.: Female characteristics and requirements in software engineering in mechanical engineering. In: 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 272–279. IEEE, Piscataway (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2014.7017783. ISBN 978-1-4799-4437-8
Hogan, R.: Personality and the Fate of Organizations. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007). http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0662/2006010473-b.html. ISBN 1410614999
Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M.: The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: evidence from a field experiment. Manage. Sci. 59(7), 1514–1528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1674. ISSN 0025-1909
Janke, E., Bartel, A., Figas, P., et al.: Die lehre von software engineering - eine erhebung aus der praxis. Tagungsband Embedded Software Engineering Kongress ESE-Kongress 2012, 683–689 (2012)
Kanij, T., Merkel, R., Grundy, J.: An empirical investigation of personality traits of software testers. In: Eighth International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE 2015, pp. 1–7. IEEE, Piscataway (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE.2015.7. ISBN 978-1-4673-7031-8
Karimi, Z., Wagner, S.: The influence of personality on computer programming: a summary of a systematic literature review. http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Felib.uni-stuttgart.de%2Fopus%2Fvolltexte%2F2014%2F8987%2Fpdf%2FSLR_Summary.pdf&ei=8nEuVebmDsriO8yxgbAD&usg=AFQjCNHSHTiWSNQZRuLiGWAH_OzUIqD4Ig&bvm=bv.90790515,d.ZWU
Lee, K., Ashton, M.C.: The hexaco personality inventory - revised - scaledescriptions (2009). http://hexaco.org/scaledescriptions
Ludewig, J., Lichter, H.: Software Engineering: Grundlagen, Menschen, Prozesse, Techniken. Dpunkt.verl., Heidelberg, 3., korr. aufl. edition (2013). ISBN 9783864900921
Saucier, G., Goldberg, L.R.: Evidence for the big five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. Eur. J. Pers. 10(1), 61–77 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199603)10:1<61::AID-PER246>3.0.CO;2-D. ISSN 0890-2070
Schaeper, H., Briedis, K.: Kompetenzen von hochschulabsolventinnen und hochschulabsolventen, berufliche anforderungen und folgerungen für die hochschulreform. HIS Kurzinformation Hochschul-Informations-System 2004(A6), 1–62 (2004)
Tett, R.P., Burnett, D.D.: A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(3), 500–517 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500. ISSN 0021-9010
Winsborough, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T.: Great teams are about personalities, not just skills (2017). https://hbr.org/2017/01/great-teams-are-about-personalities-not-just-skills
Zaraket, F.A., Olleik, M., Yassine, A.A.: Skill-based framework for optimal software project selection and resource allocation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(1), 308–318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.035. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171300790X. ISSN 0377-2217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Weilemann, E., Brune, P. (2021). How to Staff Software Engineering Team Roles Using the Concept of Personality? – An Exploratory Study. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Ramalho Correia, A.M. (eds) Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies . WorldCIST 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1367. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72660-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72660-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72659-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72660-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)