Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Third Sector Research ((PSTSR))

  • 633 Accesses

Abstract

In the Scandinavian countries there is a long historical tradition of voluntary-public sector collaboration. The dominant collaboration has been that the public sector provides financial support to voluntary organisations, but the activities are undertaken by the organisation itself. In recent times, however, a new discourse for the collaboration has emerged with closer collaboration between the two sectors around tasks for which public institutions are responsible. In the Scandinavian countries, this form of collaboration is referred to as collective co-production. The purpose of this book is to shed light on a number of issues in this form of collaboration. The introduction defines different forms of collaboration, discusses ideals and challenges for close collaboration between the public and voluntary sectors, and provides a brief description of all the contributions to the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agger, A., & Tortzen, A. (2015). Forskningsreview om samskabelse. University College Lillebælt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 9–17). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras, B., & Strømsnes, K. (2018). Scandinavian civil society and social transformations. The case of Norway. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (1993). The welfare mix approach. Understanding the pluralism of welfare systems. In A. Evers & I. Svetlik (Eds.), Balancing pluralism. New welfare mixes in care for the elderly. European Centre Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organisations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9–10), 737–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehsenfeld, M., & Levinsen, K. (2019). Taking care of the refugees – Exploring advocacy and cross-sector collaboration in service provision for refugees. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations. Advance Online Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. L. (2007). The purpose (and Perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., & Newton, K. (1985). Voluntary organisations and community politics: Norwegian and British comparisons. Scandinavian Political Studies, 8(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1985.tb00309.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrits, G. S., & Larsen, L. T. (2016). Professional claims to authority: A comparative study of Danish doctors and teachers (1950–2010). Journal of Professions and Organisation, 3(2), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2013). Evidence-based policymaking – Speaking truth to power? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., Wang, S., & Norton, M. (2020). Social environments for world happiness. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. D. Sachs, & J.-E. De Neve (Eds.), World happiness report. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, L. S., Strømsnes, K., & Svedberg, L. (2019). Civic engagement in Scandinavia. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. H., & Lynn, L. E. (2003). Why do organisations collaborate? Empirical evidence from Chicago public schools. Prepared for the National Public Management Research Conference, 9–11 October 2003, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy. New forms of economic and social governance. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, K. (2005). Professionalisering i den offentlige sektor [Professionalisation in the public sector]. Roskilde Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, L., & De Waele, E. (2015). Managing hybridity in a changing welfare mix: Everyday practices in an entrepreneurial nonprofit in Belgium. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 26(5), 1666–1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9625-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibsen, B. (Ed.). (2020). Den frivillige kommune [The voluntary municipality]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibsen, B., & Habermann, U. (2005). Defining the non-profit sector. Denmark. The Johns Hopkins Non-Profit Sector Project. The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsen, K., & Ibsen, B. (2017). Foreningers samarbejde med kommunale institutioner [Associations’ cooperation with municipal institutions]. Movements 2017: 2. University of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsen, K., Thøgersen, M., & Ibsen, B. (2012). Institutional reforms and voluntary associations. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00290.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, H. (2013). Utdanning og kompetanse i idretten [Education and competencies in sport]. Institutt for Samfunnsforskning, Rapport 2013:05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and urban governance: Adding a more contextualised ‘Top-down’ perspective. Political Studies, 48(4), 802–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, E. (2020). Samskabelse: En interdisciplinær begrebsuddybelse. Dansk Sociologi, 31(2), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røiseland, A., & Lo, C. (2019). Samskaping – nyttig begrep for norske forskere og praktikere? Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 35(1), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and thirds-party government. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheir, H. K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector. Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Sector Series. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, P. (1993). Voluntary organisations and the welfare state: The case of Norway. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 4(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivesind, K. H., & Saglie, J. (2017). Promoting active citizenship. Markets and choice in Scandinavian welfare. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • TrägÃ¥rdh, L., Selle, P., Henriksen, L. S., & Hallin, H. (2013). Civilsamhället klämt mellan stat och kapital: Välfärd, mÃ¥ngfald, framtid. SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (1989). Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligation. University of California Press. www.statista.com/statistics/270180/countries-with-the-largest-gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-capita/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjarne Ibsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ibsen, B. (2021). Introduction. In: Ibsen, B. (eds) Voluntary and Public Sector Collaboration in Scandinavia . Palgrave Studies in Third Sector Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72314-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72315-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics