Abstract
In this study, the main purpose is to capture people and companies’ attention upon wind energy issue. For this target, both onshore and offshore wind plant criteria and related risk issues are studied. In this framework, firstly a wide theoretical review is presented on onshore and offshore wind energy. Afterward, the pros and cons of onshore and offshore wind energy were discussed. At this point, these features are viewed from the perspective of developing countries. According to the study’s results, it is identified that although onshore wind energy plants have a comparative advantage in terms of cost, when considering efficiency offshore wind energy is one step ahead. In this context, it is determined that investors can encounter many problems when investing in onshore or offshore wind energy projects. Therefore, it is suggested that to invest in onshore wind energy plants, the country’s legal system and public awareness must be improved. In addition to this, for invest in offshore wind energy plants, it is proposed that countries should invest in training labor force and technology in order to minimize possible costs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arabpour, A., Besmi, M. R., & Maghouli, P. (2019). Transmission expansion and reactive power planning considering wind energy investment using a linearized AC model. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 14(3), 1035–1043.
Argin, M., Yerci, V., Erdogan, N., Kucuksari, S., & Cali, U. (2019). Exploring the offshore wind energy potential of Turkey based on multi-criteria site selection. Energy Strategy Reviews, 23, 33–46.
Azasoo, J. Q., Kanakis, T., Al-Sherbaz, A., & Agyeman, M. O. (2019, April). Improving electricity network efficiency and customer satisfaction in generation constrained power system. In 2019 6th international conference on control, decision and information technologies (CoDIT) (pp. 2010–2015). IEEE.
Beainy, A., Maatouk, C., Moubayed, N., & Kaddah, F. (2016, July). Comparison of different types of generator for wind energy conversion system topologies. In 2016 3rd international conference on renewable energies for developing countries (REDEC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Bento, N., & Fontes, M. (2019). Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 99, 66–82.
Carotenuto, P., Meyer, V. M., Strøm, P. J., Cabarkapa, Z., St John, H., & Jardine, R. (2018). Installation and axial capacity of the Sheringham Shoal Offshore wind farm monopiles – a case history. In Engineering in chalk: Proceedings of the chalk 2018 conference (pp. 117–122). ICE Publishing.
Chalvatzis, K. J., & Ioannidis, A. (2017). Energy supply security in the EU: Benchmarking diversity and dependence of primary energy. Applied Energy, 207, 465–476.
Colmenar-Santos, A., Perera-Perez, J., Borge-Diez, D., & dePalacio-Rodríguez, C. (2016). Offshore wind energy: A review of the current status, challenges and future development in Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 1–18.
Costa, H., & Veiga, L. (2016, May). Gone with the wind? Local employment impact of wind energy investment. In Draft paper delivered at the 4th IZA conference: Labor market effects of environmental policies. Retrieved from http://conference.iza.org/conference_files/environ_2016/costa_h24225.ppdf
Costoya, X., DeCastro, M., Carvalho, D., & Gómez-Gesteira, M. (2020). On the suitability of offshore wind energy resource in the United States of America for the 21st century. Applied Energy, 262, 114537.
DeCastro, M., Salvador, S., Gómez-Gesteira, M., Costoya, X., Carvalho, D., Sanz-Larruga, F. J., & Gimeno, L. (2019). Europe, China and the United States: Three different approaches to the development of offshore wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 109, 55–70.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Ubay, G. G., & Karakuş, H. (2020). BSC-based evaluation for the factors affecting the performance of wind energy companies. In Strategic priorities in competitive environments (pp. 1–15). Cham: Springer.
Ding, Y., Shao, C., Yan, J., Song, Y., Zhang, C., & Guo, C. (2018). Economical flexibility options for integrating fluctuating wind energy in power systems: The case of China. Applied Energy, 228, 426–436.
Diógenes, J. R. F., Claro, J., Rodrigues, J. C., & Loureiro, M. V. (2020). Barriers to onshore wind energy implementation: A systematic review. Energy Research & Social Science, 60, 101337.
Forbes, K. F., & Zampelli, E. M. (2019). Wind energy, the price of carbon allowances, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from Ireland. Energy Policy, 133, 110871.
Garrett-Peltier, H. (2017). Green versus brown: Comparing the employment impacts of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fossil fuels using an input-output model. Economic Modelling, 61, 439–447.
Gnatowska, R., & Moryń-Kucharczyk, E. (2019). Current status of wind energy policy in Poland. Renewable Energy, 135, 232–237.
Grüger, F., Hoch, O., Hartmann, J., Robinius, M., & Stolten, D. (2019). Optimized electrolyzer operation: Employing forecasts of wind energy availability, hydrogen demand, and electricity prices. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(9), 4387–4397.
He, D. X. (2016). Coping with climate change and China’s wind energy sustainable development. Advances in Climate Change Research, 7(1–2), 3–9.
Himri, Y., Merzouk, M., Merzouk, N. K., & Himri, S. (2020). Potential and economic feasibility of wind energy in south west region of Algeria. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 38, 100643.
Igliński, B., Iglińska, A., Koziński, G., Skrzatek, M., & Buczkowski, R. (2016). Wind energy in Poland – History, current state, surveys, renewable energy sources act, SWOT analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 19–33.
Juaidi, A., Montoya, F. G., Ibrik, I. H., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2016). An overview of renewable energy potential in Palestine. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 943–960.
Junginger, M., Hittinger, E., Williams, E., & Wiser, R. (2020). Onshore wind energy. In Technological learning in the transition to a low-carbon energy system (pp. 87–102). New York: Academic Press.
Kaldellis, J. K., & Apostolou, D. (2017). Life cycle energy and carbon footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart. Renewable Energy, 108, 72–84.
Korsakienė, R., Raišienė, A. G., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Aleksejevec, V. (2020). Strategic mapping of eco-innovations and human factors: Business projects’ success revisited. In Strategic outlook for innovative work behaviours (pp. 1–19). Cham: Springer.
Kumar, Y., Ringenberg, J., Depuru, S. S., Devabhaktuni, V. K., Lee, J. W., Nikolaidis, E., Andersen, B., & Afjeh, A. (2016). Wind energy: Trends and enabling technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 209–224.
Ladenburg, J., Hevia-Koch, P., Petrović, S., & Knapp, L. (2020). The offshore-onshore conundrum: Preferences for wind energy considering spatial data in Denmark. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 121, 109711.
Lamy, J., de Bruin, W. B., Azevedo, I. M., & Morgan, M. G. (2020). Keep wind projects close? A case study of distance, culture, and cost in offshore and onshore wind energy siting. Energy Research & Social Science, 63, 101377.
Li, X., Zhu, S., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). Kano-based mapping of innovation strategies for renewable energy alternatives using hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making approach. Energy, 211, 118679.
Qiu, D., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). Multi-faceted analysis of systematic risk-based wind energy investment decisions in E7 economies using modified hybrid modeling with IT2 fuzzy sets. Energies, 13(6), 1423.
Rogers, T., Ashtine, M., Koon, R. K., & Atherley-Ikechi, M. (2019). Onshore wind energy potential for Small Island developing states: Findings and recommendations from Barbados. Energy for Sustainable Development, 52, 116–127.
Ryberg, D. S., Caglayan, D. G., Schmitt, S., Linßen, J., Stolten, D., & Robinius, M. (2019). The future of European onshore wind energy potential: Detailed distribution and simulation of advanced turbine designs. Energy, 182, 1222–1238.
Sagbansua, L., & Balo, F. (2017). Decision making model development in increasing wind farm energy efficiency. Renewable Energy, 109, 354–362.
Shoaib, M., Siddiqui, I., Rehman, S., Khan, S., & Alhems, L. M. (2019). Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 346–360.
Tawfiq, K. B., Mansour, A. S., Ramadan, H. S., Becherif, M., & El-Kholy, E. E. (2019). Wind energy conversion system topologies and converters: Comparative review. Energy Procedia, 162, 38–47.
Walmsley, T. G., Walmsley, M. R., & Atkins, M. J. (2017). Energy return on energy and carbon investment of wind energy farms: A case study of New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 885–895.
Wang, Q., Li, S., & Pisarenko, Z. (2020). Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency, oil price, environmental pressure, R&D investment, and policy on renewable energy – Evidence from the G20 countries. Energy, 209, 118322.
Wang, S., Yang, H., Pham, Q. B., Khoi, D. N., & Nhi, P. T. T. (2020). An ensemble framework to investigate wind energy sustainability considering climate change impacts. Sustainability, 12(3), 876.
Williams, E., Hittinger, E., Carvalho, R., & Williams, R. (2017). Wind power costs expected to decrease due to technological progress. Energy Policy, 106, 427–435.
WWEA. (2020). https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2020_full_report_en.pdf
Yan, Z., Zou, B., Du, K., & Li, K. (2020). Do renewable energy technology innovations promote China’s green productivity growth? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models. Energy Economics, 90, 104842.
Yao, S., Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2019). Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets curve perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338–1352.
Yuan, J., Zhang, Z., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2020). Evaluating recognitive balanced scorecard-based quality improvement strategies of energy investments with the integrated hesitant 2-tuple interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making approach to QFD. IEEE Access.
Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Uluer, G. S. (2020). The role of technological development on renewable energy usage: An econometric analysis for G7 countries. In Handbook of research on sustainable supply chain management for the global economy (pp. 136–153). IGI Global.
Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Karakuş, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). The negative effects of carbon emission on FDI: A comparative analysis between E7 and G7 countries. In Handbook of research on sustainable supply chain management for the global economy (pp. 20–35). IGI Global.
Zeng, L., Li, G., Li, M., Feng, Z., Yang, L., & Luo, X. (2020). Design and experimental performance of an off-grid ice storage system driven by distributed wind energy. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110252.
Zhong, J., Hu, X., Yüksel, S., Dincer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). Analyzing the investments strategies for renewable energies based on multi-criteria decision model. IEEE Access, 8, 118818–118840.
Zhu, L., Hu, L., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Karakuş, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). Analysis of strategic directions in sustainable hydrogen investment decisions. Sustainability, 12(11), 4581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ubay, G.G. (2021). Strategy Proposals for Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Investments in Developing Countries. In: Dincer, H., Yüksel, S. (eds) Management Strategies to Survive in a Competitive Environment. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72288-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72288-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72287-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72288-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)