Abstract
Black Soils have attracted renewed attention from policy-makers and the public thanks to strong interest from China; an International Network on Black Soils was launched in 2017 and the first plenary meeting held in Harbin in 2018. The Chernozem originally defined by Dokuchaev in 1883 is the central concept of Black Soils but, more than 140 years on, these soils have been much changed by human intervention and there is a need for a new definition—including Chernozem but, also, other soils with similar properties. The term Black Soils is taken to encompass Chernozem, Kastanozem and Phaeozem—all characterized by thick, dark-coloured, humus-rich topsoil originally developed under grassland. Chernozems, in particular, are known for their granular structure, optimal bulk density, and goodly stock of plant nutrients; however, all these favorable properties are only present in soils within virgin ecosystems that are now rare. Black Soils make up only 7% of the land surface but they are of fundamental importance to food security; UN Sustainable Development Goal 2—to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030—will only be achieved if we introduce a mandatory framework for their sustainable management. Sustainable management means arrest of soil erosion, compaction, salinity, sodicity, pollution and soil sealing; maintenance of protective cover, a stable stock of soil organic matter both as a store of plant nutrients and as a carbon sink; maintenance of capacity to infiltrate and hold rainfall and irrigation water but drain any excess to streams and groundwater; and conservation of biodiversity to maintain essential soil functions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Borrelli, P., D.A. Robinson, L.R. Fleischer, et al. 2017. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications 8 (1): 2013.
Dokuchaev, V.V. 1883. Russian Chernozem. Israel Pro edition 1967, trans. from Russian by N. Kaner, ed. S. Monson. Jerusalem.
FAO. 2017. Voluntary guidelines for sustainable soil management. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i6874en/I6874EN.pdf.
FAO and ITPS. 2015. Status of the world’s soil resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/a-i5199e.pdf.
Global Soil Partnership. 2017. https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/intergovernmental-technical-panel-soils/gsoc17-implementation/internationalnetworkblacksoils/en/.
HWSD. 2012. FAO-IIASA-ISRIC-ISSCAS-JRC harmonized world soil database (version 1.2). Rome: FAO; Laxenburg: IIASA. http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/harmonized-world-soil-database-v12/en/.
IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/a-i3794e.pdf.
Krupenikov, I.A., B.P. Boincean, and D.L. Dent. 2011. The Black Earth. Ecological principles for sustainable agriculture on Chernozem soils. Dordrecht: Springer.
Liu, X., C. Lee Burras, Y.S. Kravchenko, et al. 2012. Overview of Mollisols in the world: Distribution, land use and management. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92 (3): 383–402.
Lysychenko, G., I. Kuraieva, A. Samchuk, et al. 2017. Heavy metals in soils under the heel of heavy industry. In Soil science working for a living, ed. D.L. Dent and Y. Dmytruk, 203–212. Cham: Springer Nature.
Medvedev, V.V. 2012. Soil monitoring of Ukraine. The concept. Results. Tasks, 2nd ed. Kharkiv: The City Printing House (Ukrainian).
Medvedev, V.V., T.M. Laktionova, L.G. Potsheptsova, and P. Lamar. 2006. Innovative tendencies in tillage. In Agrochemistry and soil science. Special issue on the VII Congress of the USSA, Book One, 79–94, Kharkiv (Ukrainian).
Panagos, P., M. Van Liedekerke, Y. Yigini, and L. Montanarella. 2013. Contaminated sites in Europe: Review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Art. No. 158764.
Panagos, P., G. Standardi, P. Borrelli, et al. 2018. Cost of agricultural productivity loss due to soil erosion in the European Union: From direct cost evaluation approaches to the use of macroeconomic models. Land Degradation & Development 29 (3): 471–484.
Sartori, M., G. Philippidis, E. Ferrari, et al. 2019. A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: Assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion. Land Use Policy 86: 299–312.
Teich-McGoldrick, S.L., J.A. Greathouse, C.F. Jove-Colon, and R.T. Cygan. 2015. Swelling properties of montmorillonite and beidellite clay minerals from molecular simulation: Comparison of temperature, interlayer cation, and charge location effects. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119 (36): 20880–20891.
Worster, D. 2004. Dust bowl: The southern plains in the 1930s. Oxford University Press.
Zhukov, A., and G. Gadorozhnaya. 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a Typical chernozem: The ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava) 35 (3): 263–278 (Slovak).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Montanarella, L., Panagos, P., Scarpa, S. (2021). The Relevance of Black Soils for Sustainable Development. In: Dent, D., Boincean, B. (eds) Regenerative Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72224-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72224-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72223-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72224-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)