Through the world’s colonial history, pacification campaigns established political and economic control by foreign countries over domestic populations struggling for sovereignty. In contemporary post-colonial times, pacification patterns may be reproduced by central governments of new states, to subdue marginalized ethnic groups. We first explain pacification by reviewing the US-Filipino colonial era. We then unpack post-colonial pacification in its modern-day form, using as a case in point peace negotiations between Philippine Government and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). Analyzing speeches delivered by both sides, we show that the Philippine Government expresses a pacification storyline by calls for disarmament and economic development, while the MILF pushes for territorial sovereignty. In conclusion, we address peace negotiations in the global and domestic arenas. We caution that attending solely to pacification narratives may re-subjugate indigenous peoples, contribute to the breakdown of peace agreements, and bring about new liberation factions which demand territorial sovereignty.
- Peace talks
- Social computing
- Positioning theory
- Territorial rights
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Abubakar, C. A. (1989). Moro ethno-nationalist movement. In K. David & S. Kadirgamar (Eds.), Ethnicity, identity, conflict and crisis (pp. 108–125). Hong Kong: Arena Press.
Abubakar, C. A. (2004). Review of the Mindanao peace processes. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 5(3), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464937042000288732
Adam, J. (2018). Bringing grievances back in: Towards an alternative understanding of the rise of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front in the Philippines. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia And Oceania, 174(1), 1–23.
Bacani, B. R. (2005). The Mindanao peace talks: Another opportunity to resolve the Moro conflict in the Philippines/Benedicto R. Bacani. Washington, DC: USIP.
Bacus, R. J. (2015). Autonomy or secession: Analysis of the constitutionality of the Bangsamoro basic law. Ateneo Law Journal, 59(4), 1433–1456.
Barnett, G. (2005). A trilogy of wars: The Philippine revolutionary wars of 1896-97, the Spanish-American war in the Philippines in 1898, and the Filipino-American war, 1899-1902. Military History, 2, 66.
Candelaria, S. M. (2009). Postscript to the supreme court MOA-AD judgment: No other way but to move forward. Ateneo Law Journal, 54(1), 269–273.
Cullinane, M. (2009). Bringing in the brigands the politics of pacification in the colonial Philippines, 1902-1907. Philippine Studies, 57(1), 49.
Davenport, C. (2004). The promise of democratic pacification: An empirical assessment. International Studies Quarterly, 3, 539.
Davies, B., & Harre, R. (2007). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Athenea Digital, 12, 242–259.
De Viana, A. V. (2006). The I-stories: The Philippine revolution and the Filipino-American war as told by its eyewitnesses and participants. Manila: University of Santo Tomas Pub. House.
Dioso, M. M. (2004). A trilogy of wars: The Philippine revolutionary wars of 1896-7, the Spanish-American war in the Philippines in 1898, and the Filipino-American war, 1899-1902. Pittsburgh, PA: Dorrance Pub.
Garcia, M. (1969). Aguinaldo in retrospect: A volume issued to commemorate the centenary of General Emilio Aguinaldo y Famy: With documents on the Philippine-American war, 1898-1901, and the first Philippine Republic. Manila: Philippine Historical Association.
Ileto, R. C. (2017). Knowledge and pacification: On the U.S. conquest and the writing of Philippine history. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Keenan, J. (2001). Encyclopedia of the Spanish-American & Philippine-American wars. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Keliher, M. (2007). Anglo-American rivalry and the origins of U.S. China policy. Diplomatic History, 31(2), 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2007.00613.x
Lagarde, M. D. (2015). Clearing the pathways to peace: Law, policy, and the Mindanao conflict. Ateneo Law Journal, 59(4), 1141–1204.
Linn, B. M. (2000). The Philippine war, 1899–1902. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Lowe, A. (1985). The problems of extraterritorial jurisdiction: Economic sovereignty and the search for a solution. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 4, 724.
Maca, M. (2017). American colonial education policy and Filipino labour migration to the US (1900–1935). Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(3), 310–328.
Mactal, R. B. (2014). Ang epekto ng digmaang Pilipino-Amerikano sa kabuhayan at antas ng pamumuhay sa Maynila, 1898-1901. Malay, 26(2), 36–52.
McKinley, W. (1900, December 3). Presidential speech [written]. Retrieved from https://genius.com/amp/William-mckinley-presidential-speech-1900-written-annotated
McMichael, C. (2015). Urban pacification and ‘Blitzes’ in contemporary Johannesburg. Antipode, 47(5), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12160
Miller, S. C. (1982). Benevolent assimilation: The American conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moghaddam, F. M., Harre, R., & Lee, N. (2008a). Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis. New York: Springer.
Moghaddam, F. M., Harre, R., & Lee, N. (2008b). Positioning and conflict: An introduction. In F. M. Moghaddam, R. Harre, & N. Lee (Eds.), Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis (pp. 3–20). New York: Springer.
Neocleous, M. (2010). War as peace, peace as pacification. Radical Philosophy, 159, 8–17.
Neocleous, M. (2013). The dream of pacification: Accumulation, class war, and the hunt. The Social Studies, 9(2), 7.
Neocleous, M. (2016). The logic of pacification: War-police accumulation. Athenea Digital, 16(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1738
North, M. (2012). Data mining for the masses. Global Text Project, c2012.
Ooi, K. G. (2007). Southeast Asia: A historical encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Plank, F. (2015). Not enough pieces of the cake? The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) in the Mindanao final agreement. Asian Security, 11(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2015.1071795
Rigakos, G. (2011). “To extend the scope of productive labour”: Pacification as police project. In M. Neoclous & G. Rigakos (Eds.), Anti-security (pp. 57–84). Ottawa: Red Quill Books.
Rodil, R. B. (2009). Conflict between the Moro Liberation Fronts (MIM-MNLF-MILF) and the government in historical perspective. Ateneo Law Journal, 54(1), 256–262.
Schirmer, D. B., & Shalom, S. R. (1987). The Philippines reader: A history of colonialism, neocolonialism, dictatorship, and resistance. Quezon City: Ken.
Schurman, J. G. (1900). General Lawton as warrior, statesman, and man: Elegant tributes from President Schurman of the Philippine Commission, and the Rev. Peter MacQueen, a hero whom the nation mourns. Leslie’s Weekly, 10–11.
Sheridan, R. B., & Turot, H. (1998). Eyewitness accounts in 1900 of the Philippine revolution, the Filipino-American war and the U.S. occupation of the Philippines. Manila: Trademark Publishing Corporation.
Slocum-Bradley, N. (2010). The positioning diamond: A trans-disciplinary framework for discourse analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00418.x
Stilz, A. (2009). Why do states have territorial rights? International Theory, 1(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000104
Tan, S. K. (2002). The Filipino-American war, 1899–1913 (p. c2002). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2006). Introduction to data mining. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Turot, H. (1981). Emilio Aguinaldo: First Filipino president, 1898–1901. Manila: Foreign Service Institute, University of the Philippines.
Van Langenhove, L., & Harre, R. (1994). Cultural stereotypes and positioning theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24(4), 359–372.
Wesling, M. (2011). Empires proxy: American literature and U.S. imperialism in the Philippines.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montiel, C.J., Dela Paz, E.S. (2021). One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights. In: Stevens, G., Sonn, C.C. (eds) Decoloniality and Epistemic Justice in Contemporary Community Psychology. Community Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72220-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72219-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72220-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)