Abstract
With the aim of enhancing students’ problem solving and critical and creative thinking skills and to enrich the acquisition of domain knowledge, the blended learning approach was adopted in a compulsory course for research postgraduate students at Hong Kong Baptist University since 2014. Students went through subject materials before class and then engaged in collaborative activities that required higher order cognitive thinking, such as case studies and problem solving, during class time. Since technology is central to this immersive learning experience, a variety of technology-assisted, in-class and out-of-class activities were employed in the course, such as game-based quizzes (Kahoot), quick polls (Mentimeter), case studies (Padlet, Google Doc.), pre-recorded lectures and videos (YouTube) and learning trails (using mobile and augmented reality technologies). Feedback collected from students through course feedback questionnaires and focus group interviews showed support and enthusiasm for this interactive and highly engaging type of learning. Students responded that this approach definitely fostered more productive interaction and facilitated exchange of ideas among them. They also agreed that this approach has been more effective and efficient in helping them to learn and develop generic competences. In this chapter, the authors share how this blended learning approach can be easily constructed and highlight its effectiveness in stretching student learning, creative thinking and higher order cognitive thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al Musawi, A. S. (2011). Blended learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 3–8.
Baldwin-Evans, K. (2006). Blended learning: The what, where, when and how. Training & Management Development Methods, 20(3), 353–366.
Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6, 27–39.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244.
Caner, M. (2012). The definition of blended learning in higher education. In P. Anastasiades (Ed.), Blended learning environments for adults: Evaluations and frameworks (pp. 19–34). Hershey: IGI Global.
Centre for Holistic Teaching and Learning (CHTL). (2017). MCCP7010 teaching university students. http://chtl.hkbu.edu.hk/main/mccp7010/.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Washington, DC: AAHE bulletin.
Cooper, B., & Brna, P. (2002). Supporting high quality interaction and motivation in the classroom using ICT: The social and emotional learning and engagement in the NIMIS project. Education, Communication & Information, 2(2–3), 113–138.
Downing, K., Ho, R., Shin, K., Vrijmoed, L., & Wong, E. Y. W. (2007). Metacognitive development and moving away. Educational Studies, 33(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690600850347.
Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 8(4), 251–256.
Finn, A., & Bucceri, M. (2004). A case study approach to blended learning. Los Angeles: Centra Software. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f711/12ba3bd4fbe0ce16ef8674e898a597610237.pdf.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Glover, I., Hepplestone, S., Parkin, H. J., Rodger, H., & Irwin, B. (2016). Pedagogy first: Realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12425.
Graduate School (GS) at Hong Kong Baptist University. (2017). Research Postgraduate Students Course Enrolment. http://gs.hkbu.edu.hk/en/current/rpg/coursework_enrol/.
Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth analysis of literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.
Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282–293.
LĂłpez-PĂ©rez, M. V., PĂ©rez-LĂłpez, M. C., & RodrĂguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818–826.
Molinari, D. L. (2004). The role of social comments in problem-solving groups in an online class. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 89–101.
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
Picciano, A. G., & Seaman, J. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the survey of US School district administrators. Newburyport: Sloan Consortium.
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195.
Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., Hibbard, L., Oglesby, J., & Verma, S. (2015). Blending learning: The evolution of online and face-to-face education from 2008–2015. Promising practices in blended and online learning. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560788.pdf.
Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blending learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in higher education. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of Blended learning global perspectives, local designs (p. 167). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Saltan, F. (2017). Blended learning experience of students participating pedagogical formation program: Advantages and limitation of blended education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 63–73.
Voos, R. (2003). Blended learning- what is it and where might it take us? Sloan-C View, 2(1), 2–5.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158.
Wong, E., Kwong, T., Cheung, S., Ng, G., Chiu, R., & Zhong, E. (2016). Application of augmented reality Mobile learning trails to develop students’ academic integrity. In D. Remenyi (Ed.), ELearning excellence awards – An anthology of case histories 2016 (pp. 217–232). Sonning Common: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
Zhu, E., & Baylen, D. M. (2005). From learning community to community learning: Pedagogy, technology and interactivity. Educational Media International, 42(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500161395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, E., Kwong, T., Chan, CF. (2021). Blended Learning Approach to Enhance Reflective Higher Order Cognitive Thinking Skills in Students. In: Hui, A., Wagner, C. (eds) Creative and Collaborative Learning through Immersion. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72216-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72216-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72215-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72216-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)