Skip to main content
  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the results of the qualitative portion of the analysis. Also here, the discussion is organized by method, including basic content and thematic analysis and an application of elements of the discourse-historical approach to critical discourse analysis. The content and thematic analysis section includes salient text excerpts organized by factor (i.e., the results of quantitative analysis laid out in Chapter 4). The discourse-historical approach section identifies the prominent topoi in this data set and provides representative and illustrative text excerpts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary References

Secondary References

  • Ajšić, A. (2015). Language ideologies, public discourses, and ethnonationalism in the Balkans: A corpus-based study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopædia Britannica. (2020, October 3). Nicholas I. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/414057/Nicholas-I.

  • Jovanović, S. M. (2018). Assertive discourse and folk linguistics: Serbian nationalist discourse about the Cyrillic script in the 21st century. Language Policy, 17, 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9478-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, H. (2015). “This migrants’ babble is not a German dialect!”: The interaction of standard language ideology and “us”/”them” dichotomies in the public discourse on a multiethnolect. Language in Society, 44, 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–33). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D., & Brookes, G. (2019). ‘This is England, speak English!’: A corpus-assisted critical study of language ideologies in the right-leaning British press. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1511439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adnan Ajšić .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ajšić, A. (2021). Qualitative Results by Method. In: Language and Ethnonationalism in Contemporary West Central Balkans. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72177-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72177-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72177-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics