Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Impact of Corporate Culture and CMS

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business ((BRIEFSBUSINESS))

Abstract

There is no uniform definition of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The basic idea can be traced back to the work of Bowen (1953) and Davis (1960) on the social responsibility of businessmen that was subsequently extended to companies as a whole under the label of corporate social responsibility (e.g., Carroll 1991; Jones 1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussmann, K.-D. (2015). The impact of personality and company culture on company anti-corruption programmes. In J. van Erp, W. Huisman, & G. Vande Walle (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of white-collar and corporate crime in Europe (pp. 435–452). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussmann, K.-D., & Niemeczek, A. (2019). Compliance through company culture and values: An international study based on the example of corruption prevention. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3681-5. Online version published first Sept. 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussmann, K.-D., & Matschke, S. (2008). The impact of the US legislation on company measures of control and prevention. Crime, Law and Social Change, 49, 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSO. (2020). Committee of sponsoring organizations of the treadway commission. The Institute of Internal Auditors. https://www.coso.org. Accessed Dec 2020.

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibility? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOJ & SEC. (2020). U.S. Department of Justice, & U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, FCPA Resource Guide. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Second Edition. https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/fcpa-resource-guide. Accessed Dec 2020.

  • European Commission. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Hirtenlehner & J. Reinke (Eds.) (2015). Situational action theory. Journal of Criminology and Penal Reform, 18(3). Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 26000. (2010). Guidance on social responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 37001. (2016). Anti-bribery management systems. Requirements with guidance for use.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 37301 (2020). Compliance management systems—requirements with guidance for use. 2020-04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, S. (2002). Justice in organizations. Theoretical reflections and empirical results on a theory of corporate justice. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 42, 151–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (1994). Procedural justice and culture: Evidence for ubiquitous process concerns. Journal for Sociology of Law, 15, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B. (2000). Kontraproduktives Verhalten im Betrieb: Eine individuumsbezogene Perspektive. Wirtschaftspsychologie. Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Journal Review, 26, 117–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. A., & Schein, P. A. (2019). The corporate culture survival guide (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2010/1759). The theory of moral sentiments. Los Angeles, CA: Logos Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2012/1776). The wealth of nations. London: Wordsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spießhofer, B. (2016). Compliance und corporate social responsibility, § 11. In C. E. Hauschka, K. Moosmayer, & T. Lösler (Eds.), Corporate compliance (3rd ed.). C.H. Beck: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing business ethics. Straight talk about how to do it right (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK-MOJ. (2010). United Kingdom—Ministry of Justice, The Bribery Act, guidance about procedures which relevant commercial organisations can put into place to prevent persons associated with them from bribing. http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/legislation/bribery-act-2010-guidance.pdf. Accessed Dec 2020.

  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O. (2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In P.-O. Wikström & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime, context, mechanisms, and development (pp. 61–107). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O. (2011). Situational action theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bussmann, KD., Oelrich, S., Schroth, A., Selzer, N. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility. In: The Impact of Corporate Culture and CMS. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72151-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics