Skip to main content

Gender-Transformative Public Health Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis in Public Health

Abstract

The growing recognition that gender inequalities shape health inequities is contributing to the development and strengthening of gender transformative approaches (GTA) in public health. Many of these approaches attempt to integrate considerations of intersectionality, including sex and gender-based analysis plus (SGBA+) in the Canadian context. The inclusion of intersectionality within current GTAs represents progress in advancing gender equality and health equity; however, they do not yet reflect the true potential of intersectionality to transform public health. Arguably, the interplay of the full range of complex factors and influencing forces and structures of power that underpin health inequities is not adequately accounted for. Doing this requires moving beyond a primal focus on sex and gender (and most often women) as well as binary and outdated notions of gender. It requires understanding inequities as not being restricted to gender but as inseparable from other factors such as class, race/ethnicity, sexuality, immigration status, geography, and ability – without any presumption of ranking. As such, what is needed is a more robust intersectionality-informed analysis and concrete action to understand experiences of health inequities, who is at disproportionate risk, the differences between groups of people at disproportionate risk, and how appropriate population health responses can be crafted and respond to social groups most at risk. Only then can the ultimate goal of GTA – to transform power inequities – be fully realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term “gender-transformative approach” was first coined by Gupta (2000) in relation to addressing HIV/AIDS and has gained particular traction in global health and development (Ruane-McAteer et al., 2019). It is important to note that gender-transformative approaches (GTA) to improve health come from a wide variety of disciplines, including public health, global health, psychology, social work, and epidemiology. Given this, a number of different disciplinary frameworks shape specific gender-transformative approaches and interventions (Dworkin & Barker, 2019). Given the scope of this chapter, we offer a review of general trends related to public health-focused GTA models and frameworks in relation to intersectionality, rather than a comprehensive analysis of gender-transformative approaches, models, or interventions.

  2. 2.

    The IBPA Framework has been recognized as a promising health equity tool (e.g. Buettgen et al., 2018; Heard et al., 2020; Mendell et al., 2012; Palència et al., 2014; NCCHPP, 2015) and has been taken up across a wide array of health-relevant fields including violence, mental health and substance use, HIV/AIDS policy, Indigenous policies, and the representation of diverse women in STEM fields. Despite increased recognition that intersectionality-informed approaches are necessary to capture the complexity of people’s lives, they have not yet permeated the field of public health.

References

  • Annandale, E., & Hunt, K. (Eds.). (2000). Gender inequalities in health. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—An important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettgen, A., Hardie, S., Wicklund, E., Jean-François, K. M., & Alimi, S. (2018). Understanding the intersectional forms of discrimination impacting persons with disabilities. Ottawa: Government of Canada’s Social Development Partnerships Program – Disability Component. Canadian Centre on Disability Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunjun, B. (2010). Feminist organizations and intersectionality: Contesting hegemonic feminism. Atlantis, 34(2), 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health [CEWH]. (2020). Framework for gender transformative health promotion. In Gender transformative health promotion course. Retrieved from http://bccewh.bc.ca/webinars-and-courses/courses/gender-transformative-health-promotion-course/unit-1-what-is-gender-transformative-health-promotion/framework-for-gender-transformative-health-promotion/

  • Chan, C. D., Steen, S., Howard, L. C., & Ali, A. I. (2019). Disentangling the complexities of queer theory and intersectionality theory: Research paradigms and insights for social justice. In Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 59–70). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmstadt, G. L., Heise, L., Gupta, G. R., Henry, S., Cislaghi, B., Greene, M. E., et al. (2019). Why now for a series on gender equality, norms, and health? The Lancet, 393(10189), 2374–2377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, S. L., & Barker, G. (2019). Gender-transformative approaches to engaging men in reducing gender-based violence: A response to Brush & Miller’s “Trouble in Paradigm”. Violence Against Women, 25(14), 1657–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, S. L., Fleming, P. J., & Colvin, C. J. (2015). The promises and limitations of gender-transformative health programming with men: Critical reflections from the field. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EuroHealthNet. (2017). Making the link: Gender equality and health. Policy Préci. Retrieved from https://eurohealthnet.eu/sites/eurohealthnet.eu/files/publications/PP_Gender_Digital%20Version.pdf

  • Fehrenbacher, A., & Patel, D. (2020). Translating the theory of intersectionality into quantitative and mixed methods for empirical gender transformative research on health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22(sup1), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P. J., Lee, J. G., & Dworkin, S. L. (2014). “Real men don’t”: Constructions of masculinity and inadvertent harm in public health interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 1029–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A. S., Amin, A., de Abreu Lopes, C. M., & Ravindran, T. S. (2020). Structural determinants of gender inequality: Why they matter for adolescent girls’ sexual and reproductive health. BMJ, 368, L6985. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6985

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gkiouleka, A., Huijts, T., Beckfield, J., & Bambra, C. (2018). Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: Inequalities, intersectionality & institutions-A research agenda. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, L., Pederson, A., & Poole, N. (Eds.). (2014). Making it better: Gender transformative health promotion. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzanka, P., & Grzanka, P. R. (2018). Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, G. R. (2000). Gender, sexuality, and HIV/AIDS: The what, the why, and the how. Washington, D.C.: International Center for Research on Women (ICRW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, A. M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. (2014). Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O., & Christoffersen, A. (2008). Intersectionality and the determinants of health: A Canadian perspective. Critical Public Health, 18(3), 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O., Doyal, L., Einstein, G., Kelly, U., Shim, J., Weber, L., & Repta, R. (2017). The odd couple: Using biomedical and intersectional approaches to address health inequities. Global Health Action, 10(sup2), 1326686. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1326686

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., Ferlatte, O., Clark, N., Fridkin, A., & Laviolette, T. (2012). Intersectionality-based policy analysis. In An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework (pp. 33–45). Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, S., Allotey, P., Sy Elhadj, A., Clark, J., & Horton, R. (2020). The Lancet Commission on Gender and Global Health. Comment. The Lancet, 396, 521–522. Retrieved from https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2931547-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, S., & Buse, K. (2013). Gender and global health: Evidence, policy, and inconvenient truths. The Lancet, 381(9879), 1783–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wigginton, B., & Mutch, A. (2020). Applying intersectionality theory in health promotion research and practice. Health Promotion International, 35(4), 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, L., Greene, M. E., Opper, N., Stavropoulou, M., Harper, C., Nascimento, M., et al. (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. The Lancet, 393(10189), 2440–2454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, E., Karim, N., Mohanraj, P., & Wu, D. (2015). Measuring gender-transformative change: A review of literature and promising practices. Care USA Working Paper. Retrieved from https://care.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/working_paper_aas_gt_change_measurement_fa_lowres.pdf

  • Horgan, S. A., Chen, S. P., Tuininga, T., & Stuart, H. (2020). Taking a closer look at gender-transformative health promotion programming as a vehicle for addressing gender-based inequities in health and care. Global Health Promotion, 27(3), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975919864109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kapilashrami, A., & Hankivsky, O. (2018). Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. The Lancet, 391(10140), 2589–2591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapilashrami, A., Hill, S., & Meer, N. (2015). What can health inequalities researchers learn from an intersectionality perspective? Understanding social dynamics with an inter-categorical approach? Social Theory & Health, 13(3–4), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N. (2014). Discrimination and health inequities. International Journal of Health Services, 44(4), 643–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, E., & Wu, D. (2009). CARE SII women’s empowerment framework summary sheet. Atlanta: CARE International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendell, A., Dyck, L., Ndumbe-Eyoh, S., & Morisson, V. (2012). Tools and approaches for assessing and supporting public health action on the social determinants of health and health equity. NCCDH & NCCHPP. Retrieved from http://www.ncchpp.ca/docs/Equity_Tools_NCCDH-NCCHPP.pdf

  • Morgan, M. (2014). Measuring gender transformative change. In CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems (Program Brief: AAS-2014-41). Penang, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/measuring-gender-transformative-change

  • National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy [NCCHPP]. (2015). Health inequalities and intersectionality. Retrieved from http://www.ncchpp.ca/docs/2015_Ineg_Ineq_Intersectionnalite_En.pdf

  • Palència, L., Malmusi, D., & Borrell, C. (2014). SOPHIE: Evaluating the impact of structural policies on health inequalities and their social determinants and fostering change. In Incorporating intersectionality in evaluation of policy impacts on health equity: A quick guide. Retrieved from http://www.sophie-project.eu/pdf/Guide_intersectionality_SOPHIE.pdf

  • Pederson, A., Greaves, L., & Poole, N. (2014). Gender-transformative health promotion for women: A framework for action. Health Promotion International, 30(1), 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, T., Lehrer, J., & Dworkin, S. L. (2020). Impacts of Men’s gender-transformative personal narratives: A qualitative evaluation of the Men’s story project. Men and Masculinities, 23(1), 104–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plan International. (2019). Our gender transformative approach: Tackling the root causes of gender inequality. Retrieved from https://plan-international.org/eu/blog-alex-munive-gender-transformative-approach

  • Rolleri, L. A. (2014). Gender transformative programming in adolescent reproductive and sexual health: Definitions, strategies, and resources. New York: ACT for Youth Center of Excellence, Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research. Retrieved from http://www.actforyouth.net/resources/pm/pm_gender4_0114.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, L. (2016). Incorporating intersectionality into psychology: An opportunity to promote social justice and equity. American Psychologist, 71(6), 474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J. (2018). Feminism otherwise: Intersectionality beyond Occidentalism. InterDisciplines, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4119/indi-1047

  • Rottach, E., Schuler, S. R., & Hardee, K. (2009). Gender perspectives improve reproductive health outcomes: New evidence. Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.igwg.org/igwg_media/genderperspectives.pdf

  • Ruane-McAteer, E., Amin, A., Hanratty, J., Lynn, F., van Willenswaard, K. C., Reid, E., et al. (2019). Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews. BMJ Global Health, 4(5), e001634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers. (2018). Rutger’s Gender Transformative Approach Toolkit. Retrieved from https://www.rutgers.international/sites/rutgersorg/files/PDF/GTA%20Factsheet.pdf

  • Rutgers. (2020). Gender transformative approach. Rutgers, For Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. Retrieved from https://www.rutgers.international/GTA

  • Sen, G., & Östlin, P. (2007). Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient gender inequity in health: Why it exists and how we can change it. Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/csdh_media/wgekn_final_report_07.pdf?ua=1

  • Standing Committee on the Status of Women [SCSW]. (2016). Implementing gender-based analysis plus in the Government of Canada. Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women. Retrieved from https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/421/FEWO/Reports/RP8355396/feworp04/feworp04-e.pdf

  • Status of Women Canada. (2018). Government of Canada’s Approach: GBA+. Retrieved from https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/approach-approche-en.html

  • Stinson, J., Wolfson, L., & Poole, N. (2020). Technology-based substance use interventions: Opportunities for gender-transformative health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C., Sage, M., Dillenberg, J., & Guillory, V. J. (2002). A code of ethics for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1057–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., Beehler, S., Deutsch, C., Green, L. W., Hawe, P., McLeroy, K., et al. (2011). Advancing the science of community-level interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 101(8), 1410–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Women. (2020). Counted and visible: Global conference on the measurement of gender equality, leave no one behind and intersecting inequalities. Concept Note. Retrieved from https://data.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/Global%20Conference%20on%20Intersectionality%20-%20Concept%20note.pdf

  • Valdes, F. (1997). Foreword: Poised at the cusp: LatCrit theory outsider jurisprudence and Latina/o self-empowerment. Harvard Latinx Law Review, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Herk, K. A., Smith, D., & Andrew, C. (2011). Identity matters: Aboriginal mothers’ experiences of accessing health care. Contemporary Nurse, 37(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. (2011). Gender mainstreaming for health managers: A practical approach – Participant’s notes. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. (2020). TDR intersectional gender research strategy: Building the science of solutions for all. Geneva: WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332288/9789240005068-eng.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olena Hankivsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hankivsky, O., Hunting, G. (2021). Gender-Transformative Public Health Approaches. In: Gahagan, J., Bryson, M.K. (eds) Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis in Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71929-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71929-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71928-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71929-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics