Abstract
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is at the core of current clinical practice. The philosophical origins of EBM date as far back as the mid-19th century earlier. David Sackett (1934-2015) considered as the father of EBM, described it as ‘the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients’. EBM requires that clinical decisions should be based on the evidence in totality, and not on just a single study. Systematic reviews offer the best available evidence for decision making in clinical practice. They are ‘the most reliable and comprehensive statement about what works’, and involve identifying, synthesising and assessing all available evidence by a systematic approach, to generate a robust, empirically derived answer to a focused research question. A systematic review may or may not contain a statistical analysis (Meta-analysis) depending on whether it is possible, and importantly, sensible to combine data from different studies on the same subject, or not. This chapter covers the history, principles and characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the context of EBM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alm G. Monography of Swedish fresh water ostracoda along with the systematic review of Tribus Podocopa. Zoologiska Bidrag Från Uppsala. 1916; 4. 1–248.
Anderson JD. David Sackett 1934–2015: the father of evidence-based medicine. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:343–4.
Baumeister RF (2013) Writing a literature review. In: Prinstein MJ, Patterson MD (editors) The portable mentor: Expert guide to a successful career in psychology, pp. 119–132, 2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
Blaise Pascal Biography.com: Philosopher, Mathematician, Theologian, Physicist, Scientist (1623–1662). https://www.biography.com/people/blaise-pascal-9434176. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Brent Thoma. A review of systematic reviews in knowledge translation, January 27, 2013. Caandiem. https://canadiem.org/a-review-of-systematic-reviews/. Accessed 7 July 2017.
Carl Friedrich Gauss: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Chalmers I, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1995. ISBN 0-7279-0904-5.
Chinchilli VM. General principles for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and a critique of a recent systematic review of long-acting beta-agonists. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:303–6.
Cipriani A, Geddes J. Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2003;12:146–53.
Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1972.
Douglas Altman, EQUATOR Workshop 2013 (http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Reporting-workshop-SR-principles-Oct2013-v4.pdf). Accessed 25 April 2017.
Fisher RA (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd (Edinburgh). ISBN 0-05-002170-2.
Gene V Glass: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_V._Glass Accessed on 6/11/2017.
Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res. 1976; 5 (10):3–8. http://nutrigen.ph.ucla.edu/files/view/epi-m258-spring-2012/Glass.pdf Accessed 11 June 2017.
Glass GV, McGraw B, Smith ML. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1981.
Glasziou P, Vanderbroucke J, Chalmers I. Assessing the quality of research. BMJ. 2004;328:39–41.
Global Firsts and Facts. Inventions Discoveries and More. http://globalfirstsandfacts.com/2017/09/16/linus-carl-pauling-first-person-to-receive-nobel-prize-in-two-different-categories/. Accessed 11 July 2017.
Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Users’ Guides to the medical literature: XXV evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care, Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000; 284:1290–1296.
Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. User’s guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 2nd ed. London: AMA; 2002.
History of Systematic Reviews. EPPI: Evidence-informed policy and practice, https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=68. Accessed 7 July 2017.
Linus Planning. How to live longer and feel better, 30th Anniversary Edition, May 1st 2006. Amazon Books. https://www.amazon.com/How-Live-Longer-Feel-Better/dp/0716717816/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Isaacs D, Fitzgerald D. Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1999;319:1618.
Knipschild P. Some examples of systematic reviews. In: Chalmers I, Altman D, editors. Systematic reviews. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1995.
Malletta R, Hagen-Zankerb J, Slaterc R, Duvendackd M. The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. J Dev Eff. 2012;4:445–55.
Mees GF. A systematic review of the Indo-Australian zosteropidae. Leiden: Brill; 1957.
Mosteller F, Fisher RA. Questions and answers. Am Stat. 1948; 2: 30–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2681650 https://doi.org/10.2307/2681650.
Oakley A, Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. The politics of evidence and methodology. Evid Policy. 2005;1:5–31.
O’Rourke K. An historical perspective on meta-analysis: dealing quantitatively with varying study results. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:579–82.
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ. 1988;138:697–703.
Pae CU. Why systematic review rather than narrative review? Psychiatry Invest. 2015;12:417–9.
Pearson K. Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. BMJ. 1904;3:1243–6.
Pearson K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: VII On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (Series A, containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character). 1900; 195:1–47.
Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ. 2001;322:98–101.
Pierre-Simon Laplace: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre-Simon_Laplace. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Ronald Fisher: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Fisher. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21:3–5.
Schlosser RW. The role of systematic reviews in evidence-based practice, research, and development. Focus-A Publication of the National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR) 2006; Technical Brief No 15: 1–4.
Sense about science because evidence matters: Evidence based medicine. http://www.senseaboutscience.org/pages/evidence-based-medicine.html.
Shannon H (2008). A statistical note on Karl Pearson’s 1904 meta-analysis. JLL Bull. Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/a-statistical-note-on-karl-pearsons-1904-meta-analysis/).
The Cochrane Collaboration: About us; our name. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us/our-name. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Wright DC. The published works of sir George Biddell Airy. J Br Astro Assoc. 1988;98:355–61. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1988JBAA…98..355W. Accessed 11 June 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patole, S. (2021). Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and Evidence-Based Medicine. In: Patole, S. (eds) Principles and Practice of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71921-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71921-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71920-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71921-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)