Skip to main content

Machine (Deep) Learning for Characterization of Craniofacial Variations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Machine Learning in Dentistry

Abstract

The morphology of the craniofacial structure often varies in the general population, but the severities of the variation from the normal physiological structure can reveal potential disorders that affect the patient’s quality of life. In recent years, the preferred method for diagnosis and treatment of patients with craniofacial disorders has been using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging accompanied by manual segmentation to produce a 3D model of the craniofacial region. Unfortunately, manual segmentation is often tedious, user-dependent, and costly. The field of machine learning has flourished in recent years due to improvements in computer processing power, as well as storage capacity. Machine learning in different areas of the medical field has also been up-and-coming. One beneficial application of machine learning is automatic volumetric segmentation. This learning based method is much faster and can be even more accurate than manual segmentation. This chapter will first introduce the process of automated segmentation in detail, from preparing annotated data to developing a neural network. Then we will look at an application on a specific craniofacial variation, patients with unilaterally impacted canines. The review illustrates the feasibility and benefit of using machine learning in orthodontic treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kim DW, Kim H, Nam W, Kim HJ, Cha I-H. Machine learning to predict the occurrence of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with dental extraction: a preliminary report. Bone. 2018;116:207–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Montenegro RD, Oliveira ALI, Cabral GG, Katz CRT, Rosenblatt A. A comparative study of machine learning techniques for caries prediction. In: 2008 20th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, 2008, vol. 2, pp. 477–481, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2008.138.

  3. Hammond P, Hutton T, Maheswaran S, Modgil S. Computational models of oral and craniofacial development, growth, and repair. Adv Dent Res. 2003;17(1):61–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/154407370301700114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murata S, Lee C, Tanikawa C, Date S. Towards a fully automated diagnostic system for orthodontic treatment in dentistry. In: 2017 IEEE 13th international conference on e-science (e-science), 2017, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2017.12.

  5. Gan Y, Xia Z, Xiong J, Zhao Q, Hu Y, Zhang J. Toward accurate tooth segmentation from computed tomography images using a hybrid level set model. Med Phys. 2015;42(1):14–27. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4901521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang L, et al. Automated bone segmentation from dental CBCT images using patch-based sparse representation and convex optimization. Med Phys. 2014;41(4):043503. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4868455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams R, Bischof L. Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1994;16(6):641–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.295913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen GC, Sun M, Yin NB, Li HD. A novel method to calculate the volume of alveolar cleft defect before surgery. J Craniofac Surg., vol. 29, no. 2, 2018 [Online]. Available from https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Fulltext/2018/03000/A_Novel_ Method_to_Calculate_the_Volume_of_Alveolar.20. aspx

  9. Yushkevich PA, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage. 2006;31(3):1116–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation BT – Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, 2015, pp. 234–241.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp SS, Brox T, Ronneberger O. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation BT – Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2016, 2016, pp. 424–432.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciresan D, Giusti A, Gambardella LM, Schmidhuber J. Deep neural networks segment neuronal membranes in electron microscopy images. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012, pp. 2843–2851.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sudre CH, Li W, Vercauteren T, Ourselin S, Jorge Cardoso M. Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations BT – Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, 2017, pp. 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reddi SJ, Kale S, Kumar S. On the convergence of Adam and beyond, eprint arXiv:1904.09237. p. arXiv:1904.09237, 01-Apr-2019 [Online]. Available from https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190409237R

  15. Chen S, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: Introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod. 2019;90(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.2319/012919-59.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill J. Maxillary expansion as an interceptive treatment for impacted canines. Evid Based Dent. vol. 11, p. 86, Sep. 2010 [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400742.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, S. et al. (2021). Machine (Deep) Learning for Characterization of Craniofacial Variations. In: Ko, CC., Shen, D., Wang, L. (eds) Machine Learning in Dentistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71881-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71881-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71880-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71881-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics