Skip to main content

Asymmetric Warfare Operations. Research Framework and Some Methodological Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leaders for Tomorrow: Challenges for Military Leadership in the Age of Asymmetric Warfare
  • 260 Accesses

Abstract

Since the end of bipolarism the concept of asymmetric warfare, or the more general term of asymmetric conflict, began to be more and more used in connection with conventional armed forces activities and tasks. The term was considered more adequate and inclusive of the wide variety of international missions performed by multinational military units, ranging from classic UN peacekeeping to counterinsurgency operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wells et al. [22].

  2. 2.

    Dandeker [25,26,27].

  3. 3.

    A good example is Caforio [20].

  4. 4.

    Soeters and Manigart [29]. See on this also Klein and Kuemmel [30], Klein [31].

  5. 5.

    E. Olivetta, Chap. 2What does Leadership Mean? in this volume.

  6. 6.

    E. Olivetta, ibidem.

  7. 7.

    See on this Nuciari [18, pp. 25–53].

  8. 8.

    E. Olivetta, Chap. 3From Culture to Leadership, in this Volume.

  9. 9.

    Nuciari [18, p. 34].

  10. 10.

    Ibidem, p. 35.

  11. 11.

    See Duran M. and Calatrava A. Chap. 5Military Interaction With Local Actors, in this volume.

  12. 12.

    See Duran M. and Calatrava A., in this volume.

  13. 13.

    Duran M. & Calatrava A., in this volume.

  14. 14.

    Nuciari [18, p. 33].

References

  1. Kaldor M (1999) New and old wars. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janowitz M (1960) The professional soldier: a social and political portrait. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shultz RH, Dew AJ (2006) Insurgents, terrorists, and militias: the warriors of contemporary combat. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abrahamsson B (2008) Restraint, unbridled emotion and war amongst the people. In: Weibull A, Abrahamsson B (eds) The heritage and the present: from invasion defence to mission oriented organisation. Karlstad, Swedish National Defence College, pp 147–168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caforio G (2013) Officer and commander in asymmetric warfare operations. J Defense Resour Manage 4, 1 (6):9–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moskos ChC (1976) Peace soldiers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blomgren E (2008) Is military praxis in international missions reforming the profession? In: Weibull A, Abrahamsson B (eds) The heritage and the present: from invasion defence to mission oriented organisation. Karlstad, Swedish National Defence College, pp 233–242

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gentile GP (2008) A (slightly) better war: a narrative and its defects. World Affairs 171(1) (Summer):57–64

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagl JA (2009) Let’s win the wars we’re in. Center for a New American Security, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kucera T, Gulpers L (2018) A military ethics for the new missions. In: Caforio G, Nuciari M (eds) The handbook of the sociology of the military. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp 359–376

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caforio G (2012) The military profession and asymmetric warfare. In: Kümmel G, Soeters J (eds) New wars, new militaries, new soldiers. Bingley (UK), Emerald, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petraeus DH (2006) Learning counterinsurgency: observations from soldiering in Iraq. In; Military review (January–February), pp 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carafano J (2009) 20 Years later: professional military education. Testimony before the sub-committee on oversight and investigations, Armed Services Committee, United States House of Representatives, published on May 20, 2009. https://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/20-Years-Later-Professional-Military-Education

  14. Soeters J, van Fenema PC, Beeres R (2010) Managing military organizations. Routledge, Oxon and New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Casmir FL (1999) Foundations for the study of intercultural communication based on a third-culture model. Intercultural Relat 23(1):91–116

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dodd CH (1998) Dynamics of intercultural communication, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Febbraro AR (2008) Leadership and management teams in multinational military cooperation. In: Soeters J, Manigart P (eds) Military cooperation in multinational peace operations. Managing cultural diversity and crises response. Routledge, Oxon, New York, pp 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nuciari M (2007) Coping with diversity: military and civilian actors in MOOTWs. Int Rev Sociol 17(1):25–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nuciari M (2013) Third culture in multinational military units. some experiences referring to Italian soldiers, mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  20. Caforio G (ed) (2001) The flexible officer: professional education and military operations other than war, a cross-national analysis, Artistic & Publishing Company, Gaeta

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strom M (2008) Cognitive warfighting. In: Weibull A, Abrahamsson B (eds) The heritage and the present: from invasion defence to mission oriented organisation. Karlstad, Swedish National Defence College, pp 217–232

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wells II, Hailes TC, Davies MC (eds) (2013) Changing mindsets to transform security: leader development for an unpredictable and complex world, Center for Technology and National Security Policy-Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Chapter 1-Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous: Leadership. Lessons from Iraq, pp 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piore M, Sabel C (1984) The Second industrial divide. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boyer R, Saillard Y (eds) (2002) Théories de la regulation: L’état des savoirs. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dandeker C (1996) Flexible forces for a post-cold war world: a view from the United Kingdom. Tocqueville Rev XVI I(1):23–38

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dandeker C (1999) Facing uncertainty: flexible forces for the twenty-first century. Karlstad, Swedish National Defense College

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dandeker C (2000) International security and its impact on national defense roles. In: Boëne B, Dandeker C, Kuhlman J, Van der Meulen J (eds) Facing uncertainty, Report No. 2: the Swedish military in international perspective: 2000, Karlstad, Swedish National Defense College, pp 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  28. Soeters J, Manigart (eds) (2008) Military cooperation in multinational peace operations. Taylor & Francis Group. Routledge, London and New York, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  29. Soeters J, Manigart P (eds) (2008) Military cooperation in multinational peace operations. Managing cultural diversity and crises response. Routledge, Oxon and New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klein P, Kuemmel G (2000) The internationalisation of military life: necessity, problems and prospects of multinational armed forces. In: Kuemmel G, Pruefert A (eds) Military sociology. The Richness of a Discipline, Baden-Baden, Nomos

    Google Scholar 

  31. Klein P (2003) Multinational armed forces. In: Kallaghan J, Kernic F (eds) Armed forces and international security: global trends and issues. LIT Verlag, Muenster

    Google Scholar 

  32. Soeters J, Poponete C, Page J Jr (2006) Culture’s consequences in the military. In: Bratt TW, Adler AB, Castro CA (eds), Military life. The psychology of serving in peace and combat, vol 4 (Military Culture), Wesport, Praeger, CT

    Google Scholar 

  33. Geser H (1983) Strukturformen und Funktionsleistungen sozialer Systeme. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  34. Geser H (1990) Le forme organizzative in campo militare e in campo economico. Battistelli F (ed) Marte e Mercurio. Sociologia dell’organizzazione militare. Milan, Angeli, pp 427–451

    Google Scholar 

  35. Elron S, Ben-Ari (1999) Why don’t they fight each other? Cultural diversity and operational units in multinational forces. Armed Forces Soc 26:73–97

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacIsaac JR (2000) Leadership during peace support operations: “mission impossible.” Canadian Forces College, Kingston, ON

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shamir B, Ben-Ari E (2000) Challenges of military leadership in changing armies. J Polit Mil Soc 28(1):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  38. Olivetta E (2017) Leadership, morale and cohesion: what should be changed? In: Holenweger M, Jager MK, Kernic F (eds) Leadership in extreme situations. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kernic F (2001) Sozialwissenschaften und Militar. Eine kritische analyse. Dt. Univ. Verlang, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Holenweger M, Jager MK, Kernic F (eds) (2017) Leadership in extreme situations. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hannah ST, Campbell DJ, Matthews MD (2009) A framework for examining leadership in extreme context. Leadership Q 20:897–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shamir B, Ben-Ari E (1999) Leadership in an open army: civilian connections, interorganizational frameworks and changes in military leadership. In: Hunt JG, Dodge G, Wing L (eds) Out-of-the-box leadership: transforming the twenty-first century army and other top-reforming organizations. Stanford, JAJ Press, CT

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bennett MJ (1986) A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. Int J Intercultural Relat 10(2):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bennett MJ (2004) Becoming interculturally competent. In: Wurzel J (ed) Towards multiculturalism: a reader in multicultural education, 2nd edn. Intercultural Resource Corporation, Newton, MA, pp 62–77

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hammer MR, Bennett MJ, Wiseman R (2003) The intercultural development inventory: a measure of intercultural sensitivity. In: Paige M (Guest Editor) Int J Intercultural Relat 27:421–443

    Google Scholar 

  46. Moskos ChC (2000) The media and the military in peace and humanitarian operations. McCormick Tribune Foundation, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bennett JM, Bennett MJ (2004) Developing intercultural sensitivity: an integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In: Landis D, Bennett JM, Bennett MJ (eds) Handbook of intercultural training, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 147–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Hammer MR (2009) Solving problems and resolving conflict using the intercultural conflict style model and inventory. In: Moodian MA (ed) Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence: understanding and utilizing cultural diversity to build successful organizations. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks (CA), Chap. 17

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nuciari M (2001) Officers education for MOOTW: a comparative research on military and civilian agencies problematic relationships. In: Caforio G (ed) The flexible officer: professional education and military operations other than war, a cross-national analysis. Artistic & Publishing Company, Gaeta, pp 61–88

    Google Scholar 

  50. Burns T, Stalker GM (1994) The management of innovation, Oxford U.P.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Nuciari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 1—The Questionnaire And Interviewer Guide

Annex 1—The Questionnaire And Interviewer Guide

Open with a brief explanation of the purposes of the research, as well as its cross-national dimension.

As is customary, assure the interviewee that his or her answers will be anonymous and will be used only in a general comparative statistical context.

  1. 1.

    Record an initial set of information of a socio-demographic nature. In particular:

    Code number (Country code, Service code, No. of the interview): example ITC20 (*)

figure a

(*)The country code is as usual: SL for Slovenia, BG for Bulgaria, etc; The service code is the following: C for Army, B for Navy, A for Airforce

(**)Please indicate the rank in the traditional way: lieutenant, captain, major, lieutenant colonel, colonel.

  1. 2.

    Training and specific training:

    1. 2a.

      Mastery of languages (what languages?), good training before mission, language problems during the mission, the mission influence of such mastery

    2. 2b.

      Received basic training, his correspondence, proposals

    3. 2c.

      Specific training received (governance, cultural, socio-political training), its correspondence, the mission influence on your ability in these fields, proposals

    4. 2d.

      Suitability of preparation received to acquire intercultural communicative ability in the theater of the mission.

  2. 3.

    Field experiences:

    1. 3a.

      logistical problems encountered

    2. 3b.

      ROEs: Did you have to apply the ROEs in some occasion? If yes, what is your impression on them? Did you face problems in applying them?

    3. 3c.

      hierarchical relationships, (degree of autonomy in the field)

    4. 3d.

      relationships with other actors in the area (other units of the coalition, the local armed forces, local communities, local civil authorities, local authorities and international organizations, NGOs, mass media)

    5. 3e.

      Interoperability problems

    6. 3f.

      operational experiences (baptism of fire and other combat situations; non-combat situations such as participation to local committees, governance experiences with and without civilian leaders and the like, humanitarian support…)

    7. 3g.

      experience of particular problematic situations in the field, solutions and results.

  3. 4.

    Commanded unit:

    1. 4a.

      training level of the unit to the test of facts, proposals

    2. 4b.

      compliance of the materials, proposals

    3. 4c.

      Unit’s morale: trends during mission, influencing factors, cases of defection, possible cases of PTSD.

  4. 5.

    Personal experiences: satisfaction with (the) Mission/s; personal assessment of the results, the desire to be sent in asymmetric warfare missions again in future; anything more to say?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nuciari, M. (2021). Asymmetric Warfare Operations. Research Framework and Some Methodological Remarks. In: Nuciari, M., Olivetta, E. (eds) Leaders for Tomorrow: Challenges for Military Leadership in the Age of Asymmetric Warfare. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71714-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics