Skip to main content

Revealing the Relation Between Students’ Reading Notes and Scores Examination with NLP Features

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering

Abstract

Predicting students’ exam scores has been a popular topic both in educational psychology and data mining areas for many years. Currently, many researchers devote efforts to predict exam score precisely with student behavior data and exercise content data. In this paper, we present the Topic-Based Latent Variable Model (TB-LVM) to predict the midterm and final scores with students’ textbook reading notes. We compare the Topic-Based Latent Variable Model with the Two-Step LDA model. For TB-LVM, the standard deviations of the maximum likelihood estimation and method of moments for the midterm exam are 7.79 and 7.63, respectively. The two standard deviations for the final exam are 8.68 and 7.72, respectively. The results are much better than the results of the Two-Step LDA model, which is 14.38 for the midterm exam and 16.55 for the final exam. Finally, we also compare with the knowledge graph embedding method to predict exam scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Fire, G. Katz, Y. Elovici, B. Shapira, L. Rokach, Predicting student exam’s scores by analyzing social network data, in International Conference on Active Media Technology (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 584–595

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.E. Krumm, C. D’Angelo, T.E. Podkul, M. Feng, H. Yamada, R. Beattie, H. Hough, C. Thorn, Practical measures of learning behaviors, in Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, ser. L@S ’15 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015), pp. 327–330. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728685

  3. C. Ye, J.S. Kinnebrew, G. Biswas, B.J. Evans, D.H. Fisher, G. Narasimham, K.A. Brady, Behavior prediction in moocs using higher granularity temporal information, in Proceedings of the second (2015) ACM conference on Learning@ Scale (2015), pp. 335–338

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Su, Q. Liu, Q. Liu, Z. Huang, Y. Yin, E. Chen, C. Ding, S. Wei, G. Hu, Exercise-enhanced sequential modeling for student performance prediction, in Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Pan, J. Xue, Y. Gao, H. Wang, G. Chen, Revealing the relations between learning behaviors and examination scores via a prediction system, in Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (2018), pp. 414–419

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.W. Berry, Z. Drmac, E.R. Jessup, Matrices, vector spaces, and information retrieval. SIAM Rev. 41(2), 335–362 (1999). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144598347035

  7. Y.X.K. Umemura, Very low-dimensional latent semantic indexing for local query regions, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages - Volume 11, ser. AsianIR ’03 (Association for Computational Linguistics, New York, 2003), pp. 84–91. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3115/1118935.1118946

  8. D.M. Blei, A.Y. Ng, M.I. Jordan, Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J.K. Pritchard, M. Stephens, P. Donnelly, Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2), 945–959 (2000). [Online]. Available: https://www.genetics.org/content/155/2/945

  10. D. Falush, M. Stephens, J.K. Pritchard, Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4), 1567–1587 (2003). [Online]. Available: https://www.genetics.org/content/164/4/1567

  11. L. Accardi, De finetti theorem, in Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, ed. by M. Hazewinkel (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Cham, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.M. Bishop, Periodic variables, in Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, vol. 1 (Elsevier, New York, 2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenyu Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pan, Z., Gao, Y., Ge, T. (2021). Revealing the Relation Between Students’ Reading Notes and Scores Examination with NLP Features. In: Stahlbock, R., Weiss, G.M., Abou-Nasr, M., Yang, CY., Arabnia, H.R., Deligiannidis, L. (eds) Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering. Transactions on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71704-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics