Skip to main content

Exploring Applicability of the InterCriteria Analysis to Evaluate the Performance of MOE and GOLD Scoring Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computing in Industrial Mathematics (BGSIAM 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 961))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Molecular docking is the most commonly used technique in the structure-based approaches to in silico drug design. A key element in the algorithms for docking of bioactive molecules is the scoring function, the purpose of which is to calculate quickly and accurately the interaction energy in a protein-ligand complex and to allow for selection of appropriate ligand poses in the binding pocket. Despite the large number of comparative studies, the question of which docking programs and protocols are performing better is still unresolved and the results are often contradictory. InterCriteria analysis (ICrA), developed as a multi-criterion decision-making approach, has the capacity to assist in selecting the most appropriate scoring functions for outlining drug candidates. In this study the potential of ICrA is explored for the assessment of the performance of scoring functions available in two of the widely used software packages for docking, Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) and Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking (GOLD). London dG and GoldScore scoring functions are in the focus of the study, being the default scoring functions in MOE and GOLD, respectively. Their performance has been examined based on the calculated binding energies and the experimental binding affinities of the benzamidine-type protease inhibitors in the protein targets of trypsin and thrombin. The obtained results have been subjected to ICrA and subsequently analyzed.

D. Jereva and T. Pencheva—Contributed equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atanassov, K., Atanassova, V., Gluhchev, G.: InterCriteria analysis: ideas and problems. Notes on IFSs 21(1), 81–88 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov, K.: Index Matrices: Towards an Augmented Matrix Calculus. Studies in Computer. Intel 573 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Reprinted: Int. J. Bioautom. VII ITKR Session, Sofia, 1983 20(1), S1–S6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov, K., Mavrov, D., Atanassova, V.: Intercriteria decision making: a new approach for multicriteria decision making, based on index matrices and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Issues IFSs and GNs 11, 1–8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atanassov, K.: On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Atanassova, V., Doukovska, L., Atanassov, K., Mavrov, D.: Intercriteria decision making approach to EU member states competitiveness analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design - BMSD 2014, pp. 289–294 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boehm, M., Stuerzebecher, J., Klebe, G.: Three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship analyses using comparative molecular field analysis and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis to elucidate selectivity differences of inhibitors binding to trypsin, thrombin, and factor Xa. J. Med. Chem. 42(3), 458–477 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corbeil, C.R., Williams, C.I., Labute, P.: Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 26, 775–786 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fidanova, S., Roeva, O., Mucherino, A., Kapanova, K.: InterCriteria analysis of ant algorithm with environment change for GPS surveying problem. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, pp. 271–278. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking, The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, v. 5.6.3. https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/solutions/csd-discovery/components/gold/. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  11. Ikonomov, N., Vassilev, P., Roeva, O.: ICrAData? Software for InterCriteria analysis. Int. J. Bioautom. 22(1), 1–10 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilkova, T., Petrov, M.: Application of intercriteria analysis to the Mesta river pollution modelling. Notes on IFSs 21(2), 118–125 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ilkova, T., Petrov, M.: InterCriteria analysis for evaluation of the pollution of the Struma river in the Bulgarian section. Notes on IFSs 22(3), 120–130 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krawczak, M., Bureva, V., Sotirova, E., Szmidt, E.: Application of the InterCriteria decision making method to universities ranking. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 401, 365–372 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Molecular Operating Environment, The Chemical Computing Group, v. 2016.08. http://www.chemcomp.com. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  16. Pencheva, T., Angelova, M.: InterCriteria analysis of simple genetic algorithms performance. Stud. Comput. Intell. 681, 147–159 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pencheva, T., Angelova, M., Vassilev, P., Roeva, O.: InterCriteria analysis approach to parameter identification of a fermentation process model. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 401, 385–397 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Protein Data Bank. https://www.rcsb.org/

  19. Roeva, O., Fidanova, S., Paprzycki, M.: InterCriteria analysis of ACO and GA hybrid algorithms. Stud. Comput. Intell. 610, 107–126 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Roeva, O., Pencheva, T., Angelova, M., Vassilev, P.: InterCriteria analysis by pairs and triples of genetic algorithms application for models identification. Stud. Comput. Intell. 655, 193–218 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Roeva, O., Vassilev, P., Angelova, M., Su, J., Pencheva, T.: Comparison of different algorithms for InterCriteria relations calculation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, pp. 567–572 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Todinova, S., Mavrov, D., Krumova, S., Marinov, P., Atanassova, V., Atanassov, K., Taneva, S.G.: Blood plasma thermograms dataset analysis by means of intercriteria and correlation analyses for the case of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Bioautom. 20(1), 115–124 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the National Science Fund of Bulgaria, grant DN 17/6 “A New Approach, Based on an Intercriteria Data Analysis, to Support Decision Making in in silico Studies of Complex Biomolecular Systems".

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dessislava Jereva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jereva, D., Pencheva, T., Tsakovska, I., Alov, P., Pajeva, I. (2021). Exploring Applicability of the InterCriteria Analysis to Evaluate the Performance of MOE and GOLD Scoring Functions. In: Georgiev, I., Kostadinov, H., Lilkova, E. (eds) Advanced Computing in Industrial Mathematics. BGSIAM 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 961. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71616-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics