Skip to main content

Boosting Sustainable Growth with Innovative Intangibles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Startup Valuation
  • 1928 Accesses

Abstract

Innovative intangibles typically embedded since inception in startups, foster growth, especially if they are bundled in synergistic portfolios. Digital platforms act as a growth catalyzer that ignites real options, introducing resilience and scalability in the business model. Sustainable growth needs to be ESG compliant, following the patterns of the circular or sharing economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Center for Economic Development & Social Change, http://www.ced-center.it/en/2016/09/26/economia-circolare-verso-un-nuovo-modello-di-sviluppo-economico-sostenibile/.

References

  • Banaszyk, P., & Łupicka, A. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management in the perspective of sharing economy. In: K. Grzybowska, A. Awasthi, & R. Sawhney (Eds.), Sustainable logistics and production in industry 4.0. EcoProduction (Environmental issues in logistics and manufacturing). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benty, L., & Sherman, B. (2014). Intellectual property law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwens, J., de Kok, T., & Verriest, A. (2019). The prevalence and validity of EBITDA as a performance measure. Comptabilité - Contrôle—Audit, 25, 55–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431–2456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, S., & Hirth, S. (2016). Measuring the value of intangibles. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 110–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Còrcoles, Y. R. (2010). Towards the convergence of accounting treatment for intangible assets. Intangible Capital, 6(2), 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A. (1996). The stable growth DDM: Gordon growth model. Available at http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/ddm.pdf.

  • Damodaran, A. (2018). The dark side of valuation. Pearson FT Press PTG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchev, A. (2006). Social capital and sustainable behavior of the firm. Industrial management & Data systems, 106(7), 953–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmou, L., Stefanescu, I., & Arquié, A. (2019). Productivity growth and finance: The role of intangible assets—A sector level analysis. OECD, Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisfeldt, A. L., & Papanikolaou, D. (2014). The value and ownership of intangible capital. American Economic Review, 104(5), 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. (2018). Enterprise value: The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, M., Peters, R. H., & Sean Wang, S. (2020, January). Measuring intangible capital with market prices. NBER Working Paper No. 25960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falato, A., Kadyrzhanova, D., & Sim, J. (2013). Rising intangible capital, shrinking debt capacity, and the U.S. corporate savings glut. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, No.2013-67, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfrate, G., Schoenmaker, D., & Wasama, S., (2019). Cost of capital and sustainability: A literature review. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University. Available at https://www.rsm.nl/fileadmin/Images_NEW/Erasmus_Platform_for_Sustainable_Value_Creation/11_04_Cost_of_Capital.pdf.

  • Giuliani, M., & Marasca, M. (2011). Construction and valuation of intellectual capital: A case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glova, J., & Mrázková, S. (2018). Impact of intangibles on firm value: An empirical evidence from European public companies. Ekonomicky Casopis, 66(7), 665–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2018). Capitalism without capital. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kai, W., & Seiwai, L. (2020, October). Intangible intensity and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64(101682).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasprová, O., Brabec, Z., & Rozkovec, J. (2019). The influence of intangible assets on company performance. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 19(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, B. M., & Comstock, M. (2017). ESG reports and ratings: What they are, why they matter? The Corporate Governance Advisor, 25(5), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, R. G., & Grima, A. Z. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Cost of Equity: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Business, Accounting and Finance Perspectives, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2020). The link between environmental, social and corporate governance disclosure and the cost of capital in South Africa. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 13(1),

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelbel, J., & Busch, T. (2013). Does stakeholder pressure on ESG issues affect firm risk? Evidence from an international sample. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2013(1), 15874–15874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennard, A. (2018). Intangibles: First thoughts. Paper presented at IFASS meeting, Mumbai. Available at https://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FMeeting%20Documents%2F1709060811163678%2F0502%20FRC%20presentation%20on%20Intangibles%20TEG%2018-04-06.pdf&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1.

  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting. Brookings Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. (2018). Intangibles. New York University, Stern School of Business. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3218586.

  • Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrominas, M. (2016). Recognized intangibles and the present value of growth options. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 48(2), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, D. J. (2020). Sharing economy: A systematic thematic analysis of the literature. Available at https://content.iospress.com/articles/information-polity/ip190190.

  • Minutolo, M. C., Kristjanpoller, W. D., & Stakeley, J. (2019). Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1083–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2012, April 11). Sustainability disclosures and cost of capital. SSRN. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2038654.

  • Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissim, D. (2019). EBITDA, EBITA, or EBIT? Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 17–71. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2999675.

  • OECD. (2017). Transfer pricing guidelines for multinational enterprises and tax administrations. Available at https://www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-transfer-pricing-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-and-tax-administrations-20769717.htm.

  • Park, H. (2019). Intangible assets and the book-to-market effect. European Financial Management, 25(1), 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. H., & Taylor, L. A. (2017). Intangible capital and the investment-Q relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkov, K., & Patev, P. (2018, April 5). Simple valuation methods: Franchise value approach. Alpha-Beta IR analytics, equity research series. Available at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3339774.

  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roslender, R., & Fincham, R. (2001). Thinking critically about intellectual capital accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(4), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson: Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. P. (2013). On the Intricacies of cash flow corporate valuation. Advances in Management, 6(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C., Matzat, U., & Reips U. D. (2012) Big Data: Big gaps of knowledge in the field of Internet. International Journal of Internet Science, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B. (2019). EVA, not EBITDA: A new financial paradigm for private equity firms. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahat, Y. A., Ahmed, A. H., & Alhadab, M. M. (2018). The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50, 1147–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunn, V. S. C., Bocken, N. M. P., van den Hende, E. A., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2019). Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An expert study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upson, J., & Wei, C. (2019, December 1). Supply chain concentration and cost of capital. SSRN. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3532089.

  • Verriest, A., Bouwens, J., & de Kok, T. (2018, June 11). The prevalence and validity of EBITDA as a performance measure. SSRN. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3171131.

  • Wipo Intellectual Property Handbook: policy, law and use. (2008) Fields of Intellectual property protection WIPO, chap 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xintong, G., Hongzhi, W., Song, Y., & Hong, G. (2014, December). Brief survey of crowdsourcing for data mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(17), 7987–7994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillner, S., Rusitschka, S., & Skubacz, M. (2014). Big data story: Demystifying big data with special focus on and examples from industrial sectors. Whitepaper, Siemens AG. https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ec1ca5231e88bd230216bfe5c4cb6a7f/bigfp7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Moro-Visconti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moro-Visconti, R. (2021). Boosting Sustainable Growth with Innovative Intangibles. In: Startup Valuation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71608-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71608-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71607-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71608-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics