Abstract
Since the building blocks of matter—atoms, molecules and ions—cannot be perceived naturally by our senses, the desire to reveal “the world of the invisible” has inspired philosophers and scientists for many centuries. From Plato, or even earlier, to the present day, people have tried to visualise their ideas about the nature of matter by building mental and concrete models (Gregory in Plato’s philosophy of science. Bloomsbury, 2000). The important role of using models and modelling in science discoveries to visualise concepts and processes at the particle level has been manifested since the nineteenth century by many leading chemists such as Kekulé, Van’t Hoff, Pauling, Watson and Crick (Justi & Gilbert in Chemical education: Towards research-based practice. Springer, pp. 47–68, 2002), often related with corresponding Nobel Prizes awards in chemistry, physics and medicine. In contemporary science, new developments related to the use of models and modelling are supported by the application of computer methods and computer graphics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2014). Words or pictures: A comparison of written and pictorial explanations of physical and chemical equilibria. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 783–807.
Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Hajri, S. H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students’ comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 47–58.
Bačnik, A., Bukovec, N., Vrtačnik, M., Poberžnik, A., Križaj, M., Stefanovik, V., … Preskar, S. (2011). Učni načrt. Program osnovna šola. Kemija [Curicculum. Primary school. Chemistry.]. Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo. http://www.mizs.gov.si/fileadmin/mizs.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocje/os/prenovljeni_UN/UN_kemija.pdf.
Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in chemistry: Addressing perceptions in chemical education. Springer Science & Business Media.
Barke, H. D., & Wirbs, H. (2002). Structural units and chemical formulae. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3(2), 185–200.
Corey, R. B., & Pauling, L. (1953). Molecular models of amino acids, peptides, and proteins. Review of Scientific Instruments, 24(8), 621–627.
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S. A. (2010). States of matter explanations in Slovenian textbooks for students aged 6 to 14. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 217–235.
Devetak, I., & Vogrinc, J. (2013). The criteria for evaluating the quality of the science textbooks. In M. Swe Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks (pp. 3–15). Springer.
Ferk Savec, V., Hrast, Š., Devetak, I., & Torkar, G. (2016). Beyond the use of an explanatory key accompanying submicroscopic representations. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 63(4), 864–873.
Ferk Savec, V., Vrtačnik, M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Evaluating the educational value of molecular structure representations. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education (pp. 269–297). Springer.
Ferk Savec, V., Sajovic, I., & Wissiak Grm, K. S. (2009). Action research to promote the formation of linkages by chemistry students between the macro, submicro, and symbolic representational levels. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Multiple representations in chemical education (Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol. 4, pp. 309–331). Springer.
Francoeur, E. (1997). The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27(1), 7–40.
Furió-Más, C., Luisa Calatayud, M., Guisasola, J., & Furió-Gómez, C. (2005). How are the concepts and theories of acid–base reactions presented? Chemistry in textbooks and as presented by teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1337–1358.
Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M., & Nakhleh, M. (2008). Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Springer.
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2011). Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 5–14.
Gregory, A. (2000). Plato’s philosophy of science. Bloomsbury.
Hardwicke, A. J. (1995). Using molecular models to teach chemistry. Part I : modelling molecules. School Science Review, 77(278), 59–64.
Harrison, A. G. (2001). How do teachers and textbook writers model scientific ideas for students? Research in Science Education, 31(3), 401–435.
Havanki, K. L., & Vanden Plas, J. R. (2014). Eye tracking methodology for chemistry education research. In D. M. Bunce & R. S. Cole (Eds.), Tools of chemistry education research (pp. 191–218). American Chemical Society.
Helmenstine, T. (2019). Molecule atom colors—CPK colors. https://sciencenotes.org/molecule-atom-colors-cpk-colors/.
Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Deslongchamps, G., & Williamson, K. C. (2013). Beyond ball-and-stick: Students’ processing of novel STEM visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 26, 12–21.
Hrast, Š., & Ferk Savec, V. (2017a). Informational value of submicroscopic representations in Slovenian chemistry textbook sets. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(5), 694–705.
Hrast, Š., & Ferk Savec, V. (2017b). The integration of submicroscopic representations used in chemistry textbook sets into curriculum topics. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 64(4), 959–967.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 7(2), 75–83.
Jones, L. L. (2013). How multimedia-based learning and molecular visualization change the landscape of chemical education research. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(12), 1571–1576.
Jmol Colors. (n.d.). Colors. http://jmol.sourceforge.net/jscolors/.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Models and modelling in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 47–68). Springer.
Kahveci, A. (2010). Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1495–1519.
Koltun, W. L. (1965). Patent 3170246. U. S. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3170246A/en.
Laçin-Şimşek, C. (2011). Women scientist in science and technology textbooks in Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(4), 277–284.
Majidi, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2011). Knowledge organization in physics text books: A case study of magnetostatics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(4), 285–299.
Mason, M., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ariasi, N. (2013). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 356–384.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (n.d.). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.
Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V. M., Wise, K., & Hunter, W. J. (2007). Analysis of New Zambian high school physics syllabus and practical examinations for levels of inquiry and inquiry skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 213–220.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196.
Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet. (2019). Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2019. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2019/press-release.
Pavlin, J., Glažar, S. A., Slapničar, M., & Devetak, I. (2019). The impact of studentsʼ educational background, interest in learning, formal reasoning and visualisation abilities on gas context-based exercises achievements with submicro-animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 633–649.
Petersen, Q. R. (1970). Some reflections on the use and abuse of molecular models. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(1), 24–29.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
Slapničar, M., Tompa, V., Glažar, S., & Devetak, I. (2014). Fourteen-year-old students’ misconceptions regarding the sub-micro and symbolic levels of specific chemical concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4), 620–632.
Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eyetracking students’ attention to PowerPoint photographs in a science education setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5–6), 509–520.
Torkar, G., Veldin, M., Glažar, S. A., & Podlesek, A. (2018). Why do plants wilt? Investigating students’ understanding of water balance in plants with external representations at the macroscopic and submicroscopic levels. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 14(6), 2265–2276.
Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1153.
Yen, M. H., & Yang, F. Y. (2016), Methodology and application of eye-tracking techniques in science education. In M. H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practices in Taiwan (pp. 249–277). Springer.
Acknowledgements
The reseach work was partialy supported by the Faculty of Education University of Ljubljana, project—framework “Interni razpis za financiranje raziskovalnih in umetniških projektov 2015/16 [Internal call for funding of research and art projects 2015/16]”, project title “Pojasnjevanje uspešnosti reševanja kemijskih nalog na submikro ravni ter preučevanje kompetentnosti bodočih učiteljev kemije za njihovo poučevanje [The efficiency of students in solving chemical tasks at the submicroscopic level and investigating the ability of future teachers to use them in classroom practice]”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferk Savec, V., Hrast, Š. (2021). The Role of the Explanatory Key in Solving Tasks Based on Submicroscopic Representations. In: Devetak, I., Glažar, S.A. (eds) Applying Bio-Measurements Methodologies in Science Education Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71535-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71535-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71534-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71535-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)