Abstract
A good literature review section doesn’t regurgitate everything you’ve read on the topic. Hopefully you’ve read a lot, and much of that won’t fit into your manuscript introduction. So, how to select and organize the pieces you should include? This chapter introduces writers to the metaphor of mapping the gap. Using this approach, writers learn to distil the literature to key knowledge claims, which are then organized carefully to pull the reader into the white space – the gap – that your work fills. We offer strategies for characterizing the gap, and provide a tool – the knowledge claims table – to facilitate the work of drafting a literature review. The result: a persuasive summary that reveals what’s known and what’s unknown, thus making a strong case for the research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Giltrow, J., Gooding, R., Burgoyne, D., & Sawatsky, M. (2014). Academic writing: An introduction (3rd ed.). Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Grimshaw, J. M., Patey, A. M., Kirkham, K. R., Hall, A., Dowling, S. K., Rodondi, N., et al. (2020). De-implementing wisely: Developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(5), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010060.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lingard, L., Watling, C. (2021). Mapping the Gap. In: Story, Not Study: 30 Brief Lessons to Inspire Health Researchers as Writers. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71363-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71363-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71362-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71363-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)