Characterization of International Parliamentary Bodies

Chiniaeva, Aleksandra

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71341-6_2

Aleksandra Chiniaeva¹⁸

Part of the book series: European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World ((EUNGW,volume 2))

128 Accesses

Abstract

International parliamentary institutions can be divided by the following characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 109.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 139.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 139.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
It should be noted that a sub-region is a part a large region, for instance Northern Europe is a sub-region of Europe.
2.
Arndt (2013).
3.
Marschall (2007), p. 4.
4.
Statute of the Council of Europe, Preamble.
5.
Statute of CIS, Minsk, 22 January 1993.
6.
Arndt (2013).
7.
Walter (1997), p. 988.
8.
Cameron (2009).
9.
Statute of the Council of Europe, European Treaty Series - No. 1, London, 5 May 1949.
10.
Révision portant sur le traité de 1958, available at: http://www.benelux.int/files/3914/0067/7093/trait_Benelux_17.06.2008Ondertekend.pdf (16.04.2018).
11.
According to Schermers and Blokker (2011) the Nordic Council can be considered “partly a parliamentary organization,” because it consists of members that were elected by and from national parliaments and from representatives of the governments.
12.
Article 35 of the Helsinki Treaty No 6262. (Agreement between Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden Concerning Co-operation).
13.
Schermers and Blokker (2011), p. 414.
14.
Schermers and Blokker (2011).
15.
‘Parent organization’ means here an IGO, in frameworks of which an international parliamentary assembly operates.
16.
France’s withdrawal from NATO’s military structure occurred in 1966, thus the NATO moved the headquarters from Paris to Brussels. In 1968, the Assembly headquarters moved to Brussels.
17.
Hobbs (2005), pp. 31–43.
18.
Marauhn (2016).
19.
Harpaz (2009).
20.
The European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement was signed on 2 May 1992 (entered into force on 1 January 1994). The EFTA-EEA States are closely involved in monitoring the EEA Agreement. Article 95 of the agreement establishes an EEA Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA JPC). Switzerland is the fourth Member of the EFTA that has observer status in the EEA JPC. Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are full Members of this Committee.
21.
Arndt (2013).
22.
Ruffert and Walter (2015), p. 143.
23.
Shaw (2017), p. 192.
24.
See Case 26/62 Van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Internal Revenue Administration; Case 6/64 Costa v ENEL.
25.
P. L. Lindseth called the European Treaties “enabling legislation.” He concluded that the Treaties were signed under international public law thus the European government is “an international phenomenon.” However, concurrently, the Treaties are a “mechanism to delegate regulatory power akin to a loi-cadre on the national level.” See Lindseth (2016), p. 162.
26.
Klabbers (2015b), “Straddling the Fence: The EU and International Law”, p. 62.
27.
Schermers and Blokker (2011).
28.
Capotorti (2000), pp. 738–739.
29.
Schermers and Blokker (2011), pp. 56–57.
30.
Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome (EEC Treaty) was replaced by Article 30 TFEU.
31.
Judgment of the Court of 5 February 1963.—NV Algemene Transport—en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. Case 26-62.
32.
Judgment of the Court of 15 July 1964.—Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L Case 6/64.
33.
Menon and Weatherill (2007), p. 7.
34.
Lindseth (2016), p. 152.
35.
For example: Ruffert and Walter (2015); Schermers and Blokker (2011); Lindemann (1997), pp. 892–898.
36.
Cofelice and Stavridis (2014), pp. 145–178.
37.
Arndt (2013).
38.
The deep analysis of the connections and differences between nationality and citizenship was made by Closa (1995), pp. 487–518.
39.
Opinion of Advocate General Poiares Maduro delivered on 30 September 2009. Case C-135/08 Janko Rottman v Freistaat Bayern, European Court Reports 2010 I-01449, para. 23.
40.
Schermers and Blokker (2011), pp. 415–416.

References

Books, Book Chapters, Articles, Studies, Papers

Arndt F (2013) Parliamentary assemblies, International. MPEPIL. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e525. Accessed 03 Aug 2018
Cameron I (2009) Nordic Council. MPEPIL. http://opil.ouplaw.com/abstract/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e660?rskey=stYbOp&result=140&prd=EPIL. Accessed 03 Aug 2018
Capotorti F (2000) Supranational organizations. In: Bernhardt R (ed) EPIL 4. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Google Scholar
Closa C (1995) Citizenship of the Union and nationality of the member states. Common Market Law Rev 32:487 ff, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Google Scholar
Cofelice A, Stavridis S (2014) The European Parliament as an International Parliamentary Institution (IPI). Eur Foreign Aff Rev 19(2):145 ff, Kluwer Law International
Google Scholar
Harpaz G (2009) European Free Trade Association (EFTA). MPEPIL. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e633. Accessed 03 Aug 2018
Hobbs D (2005) The assembly from 1955 to 1989. In: NATO Parliamentary Assembly 1955–2005: 50 years of parliamentary diplomacy. NATO Parliamentary Assembly, Brussels, p 31 ff
Google Scholar
Klabbers J (2015b) Straddling the fence: the EU and international law. In: Arnull A, Chalmers D (eds) The Oxford handbook of European Union Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 52 ff
Google Scholar
Lindemann H-H (1997) Parliamentary assembly, International. In: Encyclopedia of Public International Law 3 (EPIL), p 892 ff
Google Scholar
Lindseth PL (2016) Supranational organizations. In: Cogan JK, Hurd I, Johnstone I (eds) The Oxford handbook of the International Organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 152 ff
Google Scholar
Marauhn T (2016) North Atlantic Treaty Organization. MPEPIL. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e662. Accessed 03 Aug 2018
Marschall S (2007) European parliaments in transnational organisations: Parliamentary Cooperation beyond the European Union. Conference “Fifty Years of Interparliamentary Cooperation”, 2007, Berlin, p 4 ff
Google Scholar
Menon A, Weatherill S (2007) Democratic politics in a globalising World: supranationalism and legitimacy in the European Union. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 13/2007. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/wps.htm. Accessed 06 Aug 2018
Ruffert M, Walter C (2015) Institutionalised international law. C.H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, Munich
Book Google Scholar
Schermers HG, Blokker NM (2011) International institutional law: unity within diversity. Brill, Nijhoff, Leiden
Book Google Scholar
Shaw MN (2017) International law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Book Google Scholar
Walter C (1997) Addendum 1996, parliamentary assemblies, international. In: Encyclopedia of public international law 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 988 ff
Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Saarbrücken, Germany
Aleksandra Chiniaeva

Authors

Aleksandra Chiniaeva
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiniaeva, A. (2021). Characterization of International Parliamentary Bodies. In: Parliamentarization of International Governmental Organizations. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71341-6_2

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71341-6_2
Published: 23 April 2021
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71340-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71341-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics