Skip to main content

The Political Economy of the Post Commodity Boom Crises in Latin America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

This chapter revives some of the original insights from the dependency research program in order to understand the situation of the Latin American continent after the commodity boom decade. First, it is argued that we cannot only depend on macroeconomic explanations of what went wrong with the different countries’ economic policies after the commodity boom, nor on an evaluation of the strength or weakness of domestic economic institutions, but we have to consider, in the best tradition of the dependency research program, the character of the State and the composition of the social coalition. Second, following the idea of the existence of diverse situations of dependency, it argues that the combination between a certain form of the State and specific social alliances, can generate diverse types of capitalism in the periphery. To show this, we analyze in detail the situation of the more redistributive types of capitalism (of the rentier and developmentalist type) and how they coped with the end of the commodity boom. The analysis shows that the form of the state and social alliances can not only generate variations within types of capitalism, but also diverse trajectories within them, as the cases of Ecuador and Bolivia attest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Debt went from US$ 10 billion in 2009 to US$ 43 billions in 2017, and $49 billion in 2018.

  2. 2.

    https://www.cedib.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/La-carretera-villa-tunari-san-ignacio-a-quien-beneficia.pdf.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail, the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Business.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, M. (1976). Régulation et crise du capitalisme. L'expérience des Etats-Unis. Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguila, N., & Lo Vuolo, R. (2016). Argentina y Brasil: los límites de los regímenes de crecimiento liderados por el empleo y los salarios. Paper presented in the 8º Congress, CEISAL/University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. (2005). Les cinq capitalismes. Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz Nassif, A. (2021). Democracias en crisis: México y Brasil. In A. Aziz Nassif, & I. Bizberg (Eds.), Variedad de capitalismos en crisis. El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2002). Poder y Contrapoder en la Era Global, La nueva economía política global. Paidos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensusán, G. (2016, January). Organizing workers in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico: The authoritarian-corporatist legacy and old institutional designs in a new context. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 17(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizberg, I. (2014). Types of capitalism in Latin America. Interventions économiques/Papers in Political Economy, núm. 49, Université de Québec á Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizberg, I. (2015). Las variedades del capitalismo latinoamericano. El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizberg, I. (2019). Diversity of capitalisms in Latin America. Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizberg, I., & Théret, B. (2012). « La diversité des capitalismes latino-américains : les cas de l1Argentine, du Brésil et du Mexique». La Revue de la Régulation, Paris, no. 11, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschi, R., & Pinho, C. E. S. (2021). Desarrollo capitalista, austeridad fiscal y democracia en Brasil. In A. Aziz Nassif Alberto, & I. Bizberg (coord.),Variedad de Capitalismo en Crisis. El Colegio de México (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2005). How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and Society, 34(4), 509–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2015). Economie politique des capitalismes, Théorie de la regulation et des crises. La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2012). Os três ciclos da sociedade e do Estado. Perspectivas, São Paulo, v. 41, p. 13–51, jan./jun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2015). Reflecting on new developmentalism and classical developmentalism (FGV São Paulo, Working Paper 395).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2017). The two forms of capitalism: Developmentalism and economic liberalism. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 37 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajas Guijaro, J. (2018, June). ¿Hacia donde va el Ecuador de Lenín Moreno? Entre una crisis persistente y un nuevo neoliberalismo. Nueva Sociedad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1969). Dependencia y Desarrollo en América latina. México, Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan, C. M. (2011). Ecuador. Rafael Correa and the citizen’s revolution. In S. Levitsky & K. M. Roberts (Eds.), The resurgence of the Latin American left (pp. 260–282). The Johs Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Pinto, E., et al. (2017). A Guerra de Todos contra Todos: A Crise Brasileira. Texto para Discussão, no. 6, UFRJ, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the periphery. The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohling Peruzzo, C. M. (2013). Movimentos sociais, redes virtuais e mídia alternativa no junho em que “o gigante acordou”(?). MATRIZes, Year 7, no. 2, Sao Paulo, pp. 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechevalier, C. (2011). La grande transformation du capitalisme japonais (1980–2010) (p. 424). Presses de Sciences Po.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (2012). Construyendo instituciones sobre cimientos débiles: lecciones desde América Latina. Politai, 3(5), 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Vuolo, R. (2021). Argentina y Brasil: los límites a los regímenes económicos del peronismo kirchnerista y del partido de los trabajadores. In A. Aziz Nassif and I. Bizberg (coord.), Variedad de capitalismos en crisis, El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzi, M., & Wilkis, A. (2019). El dóltar. Historia de una moneda Argentina. Crítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães Prates, D., Fritz, B., & de Paula, L. F. (2021). Variedades de desarrollismo: una evaluación crítica de los gobiernos de PT. In A. Aziz Nassif and I. Bizberg (coord.), Variedad de Capitalismos en Crisis, El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques Pereira, J., & Bruno, M. (2015). Path dependence blocking the emergence of a new type of capitalism favoring redistribution in brazil: A new view on the possibility of a developmental coalition. Université d’Amiens, France (Unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, F. (2019). Bolivia: «Es la economía, estúpido». Nueva Sociedad, 283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market, and economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., Summerhill, W., & Weingast, B. R. (2002). Orden y desorden y cambio económico: Latinoamérica vs. Norte América. Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo, (12–13), 9–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novaro, M. (2019). Dinero y Poder. Las difíciles relaciones entre empresarios y políticos en la Argentina. EDHASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2005). The seven main ‘stylized facts’ of the Mexican economy since trade liberalization and NAFTA. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 941–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prates, D., Fritz, B., de Paula, L. F. (2017). Brazil at crossroads: A Critical assessment of developmentalist policies. Manuscript, Freie University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2001). ¿Por qué hay tanta inseguridad económica en América Latina? Revista de la CEPAL, (73), 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, P. (2012). China-Brasil: industrialización y ‘desindustrialización temprana’. Cuadernos de Economía, 31(56).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, P. (2016). La tormenta en América Latina. Hacia donde van las economía de la región? UDG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. R. (2014). Hierarchical capitalism. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schteingart, D. (2020, August 28). Development models in Latin America in the 21st century. Power point presentation at El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. (2009). Challenging neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Théret, B. (1995). L’État, la finance et le social. Souveraineté nationale et construction européenne. La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo, L. (2017). La Argentina kirchnerista: Alcances y límites de una experiencia democrática sobre la distribución del ingreso (2003–2015). Polis: Revista Latinoamericana, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia Lomelí, E. (2021). ¿Hacia nuevos compromisos sociales en las trayectorias de los regímenes de bienestar? Los casos de Brasil, Corea del Sur y México. In A. Aziz & I. Bizberg (Eds.), Variedades de Capitalismo en Crisis. El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilán Bizberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bizberg, I. (2021). The Political Economy of the Post Commodity Boom Crises in Latin America. In: Madariaga, A., Palestini, S. (eds) Dependent Capitalisms in Contemporary Latin America and Europe. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71315-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics